Prince Andrew seems to have enjoyed the presumption of innocence for quite a long while. He certainly has the best legal advice that money can buy, and not many people are able to hide from process servers on a royal estate. Instead of talking to the FBI, as has apparently been requested, he gave that interview in which he supplied an alibi, (apparently cannot prove), gave the non sweating defence, (apparently cannot prove), and forgot to mention any degree of sympathy for the minor victims of his convicted friends crimes. There are suggestions, in the media at least, that the infamous photo of him and VG was faked. (To be fair, GM had not been convicted at that time, but she had been accused) Now there seems to be technicalities that Prince Andrew is relying upon so that he doesn't have to answer these allegations- prior agreements between victims and JE, the living arrangements of VG.
Perhaps Prince Andrew is guilty of nothing more than having poor taste in friends, and poor judgement in other areas of his life. How can we know, he has so far refused to talk to investigators? I have read, on social media, the most awful attacks against his accusers. Lolitia's who "knew exactly what they were doing", and much worse.
Going back centuries to the Magna Carta, the British Royal Family are not meant to be above the law. It would behove him to stand up like an adult, and answer the investigators, instead of relying upon the presumption of innocence for any longer. (Technically GM was innocent a month ago too)
As an Australian, the apparent protection of Prince Andrew by the royal machine makes me sick, and makes me think about the role of the Royals in the future.