Couldn't they have just been a part of his fancy dress outfit?
my son has a pair of the fancy dress ones. you can get them off very easily with your hands behind your back.
Couldn't they have just been a part of his fancy dress outfit?
Couldn't they have just been a part of his fancy dress outfit?
I am more convinced than ever that she didn't get her dates wrong.
If the neighbour is right, there was someone in at CML that day. Can't remember the times off hand (11-2?) but it covered the period when NM/SH were at Becky's house with AG, this is very easily verifiable by AG and SH - did NM leave at any point? And if he really didn't, who was in their house??? I'm surprised more hasn't been made of this little nugget of information (on here, and in "real" life)
Strange and the thread users have been following this trial for a while?
Has it been withheld? Makes no sense.
I wasn't aware of it being a rule that we had to use initials, had a quick look at TOS and didn't find it ... however I did realise I have inadvertently broken a rule by pointing out to Warwicks that I'd pm'd them though in the spirit of transparency, it was a pm about our parnell teenage parenting not related to the case.WS is awful tonight. Almost impossible to post anything.
As an aside, is there a reason posters are on first name terms with the people involved? People being referred to as Shauna and Nathan rather than SH & NM. I thought it was a WS ToS thing to use initials but maybe not.
If the neighbour is right, there was someone in at CML that day. Can't remember the times off hand (11-2?) but it covered the period when NM/SH were at Becky's house with AG, this is very easily verifiable by AG and SH - did NM leave at any point? And if he really didn't, who was in their house??? I'm surprised more hasn't been made of this little nugget of information (on here, and in "real" life)
'The court was told today that a neighbour of the couple heard an unusual amount of noise coming from their home on both the day prosecutors say Becky died and the following day.
Sarah Webb, who lives next door to the couple, said she heard a noise which sounded like a suitcase being dragged across the floor.
She told the court: 'There was shouting and screaming between Shauna and Nathan.
'They were very, very quiet people. We never heard bumps or banging or people on the stairs. We often thought that they weren't actually in.
"A next-door neighbour of murdered Becky Watts' stepbrother and girlfriend has told a court the couple were screaming the night before the teenager went missing.
Sarah Webb, a next-door neighbour of Nathan Matthews and Shauna Hoare, described the couple as usually "very, very quiet''.
"They were never friendly and didn't want to talk," she said.
She described hearing noises in the evening of February 18 – the day before Becky went missing from her home.
"There was shouting and screaming between Shauna and Nathan," Mrs Webb said.
"It was early evening, I was putting my little one to bed so it was between 6 and 7 maybe. It was for more than half an hour. It was very unusual.
"They were very, very quiet people. We never heard bumps or banging or people on the stairs. We often thought that they weren't actually in."
THE STEPBROTHER of Becky Watts considered pretending to be her and messaging loved ones after killing the teen. Nathan Matthews said he toyed with the idea so family members would have thought the 16-year-old had just left home, following her disappearance.
Matthews, who admits the killing but claims it is accidental, said he thought about taking possessions from the home to make the story believeable.The 28-year-old said: "I would have to go back and obviously get the items, but I didn't know what to do with the items or how to message her family - my family - and let them know she was fine, 'I'm happy, I'm off somewhere'."
The following day, in the afternoon, Mrs Webb said she heard further noises from the flat.
She said: 'There was lots of running up and down the stairs very, very quickly, banging, slamming doors, scraping, furniture being moved, a suitcase being rolled across a wooden floor which was upstairs.
'I remember thinking it was annoying because I wanted to put my little one down for a nap and with the banging she was finding it difficult to sleep.
'It sounded like the bed was being lifted across the floor, like something heavy was being dragged. It was unusual, we never heard anything from them.
If it was logged at all it would of been at the beginning of the trial when the Court was hearing the evidence against NM & SH. But straight off the top of my head I can't recall. Strange.... annoyingly so.
Loving the timeline Clio. Thank you!
I'm wondering about this part
10.50am - NM and SH drive towards Becky's home. They stop at Tesco to buy batteries.
11.03am - Becky sends her last text. She is killed and her body, phone and laptop are put in the boot of NM and SH’s Vauxhall Zafira parked on the driveway.
12:10pm LO leaves dentist and tries to text Becky but message was not delivered.
There was an article quoting NM as saying he was going to use beckys phone and pretend to be here. To keep up the pretence that she was OK. I wonder if there were any texts before that 11.05 one and whether it was NM sending the 11.05 text. By 12.10 when LO texts it looks NM/SH have turned her phone off anyway but we haven't heard where her phone was when switched off and I believe it's possible to tell .
I read early on that Becky's friend Courtney (sorry don't know initials lol) texted her "Bae" at 11.06, Becky received it but never replied.
AFAIK No specific time of death has ever been given
I read early on that Becky's friend Courtney (sorry don't know initials lol) texted her "Bae" at 11.06, Becky received it but never replied.
@ColorPurple too
They can tell when a phone is switched off in relation to cell phone towers ( and when it moves between towers as it is transported ) but it doesn't look like this was done by the IT forensics or simply not testified in court.
Had never seen this bit before -
[FONT=open_sans]Friday, February 20:[/FONT]
[FONT=open_sans]Matthews texted his work and said he was not coming in as he had a problem with his car.[/FONT]
[FONT=open_sans]A device belonging to either Matthews or Hoare is used to search a concern over a pregnancy.[/FONT]
[FONT=open_sans]
Read more: http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Becky-...tory-27953184-detail/story.html#ixzz3qBrctoLs
Follow us: @BristolPost on Twitter | bristolpost on Facebook
Also from the same article -
Monday, February 23:
Police try to get into Cotton Mill Lane in the morning. The curtains were drawn and no one answers the door.
6pm: Officers go back to Cotton Mill Lane. They are not home. They ring the couple and try to persuade them to return home and let them into their property so it can be searched. They agree to talk to officers at Southmead instead as they won't come back to Cotton Mill Lane, saying they have dinner plans.
They must have been bricking it at this point. Or he must've at least. What on earth could they have done if the police had said "right, we'll just get a warrant and come round while you're out"? I'm sure this must have raised the police's suspicions.
[/FONT]
I was just curious- other posters have been doing it too. Usually, it's only the victim who is referred to by name and everyone else by initials. At least on threads that I've followed before, mainly related to UK crimes. I thought it was a ToS thing or something to do with anonymity and wondered why it was different in this case.