Insp.Dots
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2012
- Messages
- 817
- Reaction score
- 73
Thank you for that full detail.
So point 1. is allowed because Defence give permission? Judge confirms it's ok to admit then.
2. yes I could never believe there was nothing of value since may 2014 ( a query I had ages ago) so it's good to find out that actually it doesn't mean there is no evidence, just that we haven't heard about it. ( If he is addictive, it makes sense , there is more.)
But didn't both sides say in 'agreed facts' that NO sexual assault had taken place?