GUILTY UK - Rikki Neave, 6, murdered, Peterborough, 28 Nov 1994 *Arrest*

  • #281
  • #282
Back in court again today :)

Case adjourned til midnight...I guess thats another mistake

Details:Trial (Part Heard) - Resume - 10:05
Trial (Part Heard) - Case adjourned until 00:00 - 10:13

I assume the Jury are out again unless its actually been adjourned to another day
 
  • #283
Peterborough telegraph said back in today and not tomorrow ahead of Easter break so if no verdict today won't be until after Easter
 
  • #284
Peterborough telegraph said back in today and not tomorrow ahead of Easter break so if no verdict today won't be until after Easter

how long are they actually given to try and reach a verdict do you know?
 
  • #285
As long as they like apparently can go on for weeks
 
  • #286
  • #287
Last edited:
  • #288
Was wondering the same
 
  • #289
Was wondering the same

its finished earlier than normal and starting later than normal so kinda wonder if there are going to more instructions or something.
 
  • #290
  • #291
Why the Easter break starts tomorrow I don't know?
 
  • #292
I was thinking that as tomorrow is just a normal day. But then I was also wondering why they had yesterday off. There must be a log of cases lagging due to this case :(
 
  • #293
The Old Bailey is working today...just not this case for whatever reason which in a way isnt a surprise given they work an hour and have a break for some reason :(
 
  • #294
6 years ago today James was arrested... wonder if we'll have a verdict today... what we thinking will happen to the case if he's found not guilty?
 
  • #295
6 years ago today James was arrested... wonder if we'll have a verdict today... what we thinking will happen to the case if he's found not guilty?

I have no idea. Number 1 court has only just started - the rest of them started hours ago. It seems a weird time to start and I wondered if she had more instructions. The worst thing is the Prosecution deserve to lose this case but that would make Rikki would likely never receive justice :( I mean six years since he was arrested and that case was the best they could come up with?
 
  • #296
Ugh its been adjourned again
 
  • #297
Ffs what the hell is going on..
 
  • #298
Ffs what the hell is going on..

Honestly when this case is finished - assuming it ever does finish I think it should be looked at how long the case took...how many hours they didnt seem to be doing anything as they was on another adjournment or break or not in at all. When you consider what it costs to run that court room, the barristers costs etc its probably been well over a million pounds...and maybe a lot more. It has lasted around four months so far...the Prosecution had barely any evidence and spent most of their time attacking Ruth and said their case is circumstantial but to ignore evidence from the police which their own evidence comes from. I really do hope Rikki gets justice but...this case has been handled so weirdly and I dont understand why the Judge didnt try and move it along more or tell them that all the witnesses and evidence about Ruth was pretty much irrelevant as that is just confusing things.
 
  • #299
I dont know what this is meant to mean. Adjourned til tomorrow or they have put the time in wrong? it doesnt say the jury are out though so not sure
Central Criminal Court 1 T20207051
James Lewis Watson
Details: Trial (Part Heard) - Resume - 10:04
Trial (Part Heard) - Case adjourned until 00:00 - 10:15
 
  • #300
Ugh so they broke up til 2 pm...and then adjourned til 2.30...this is never ending

Now adjourned til 10:30
 
Last edited:

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
97
Guests online
1,421
Total visitors
1,518

Forum statistics

Threads
632,389
Messages
18,625,616
Members
243,131
Latest member
al14si
Back
Top