UK UK - Ruth Wilson, 16, Dorking, 27 Nov 1995

And one other thing (I've been on here two days and I sound like Columbo!) don't you think it's strange that the family have never released more photos? There's some very dark, not clear pics of her on a beach, and then the other two which I would think are about 5+ years before she disappeared (the school photo in glasses and the one without glasses in her red top), and then it's just a side shot of here where she's got a can of beer in her hand.
This last one is probably the one that is nearest to when she vanished (the beer gives it away) and in it she does look much older than the other photos, in fact it's the one that I often think explains how she pulled this all off as she does look much older and mature in it.
But these photos wouldn't give you a clue what she looked like when she left - I can't believe the family didn't have any, nor did her friends. If I was looking out for her in the days after she vanished, I would be looking for someone different to how I imagine she looked - in that later photo her hair certainly looks different.
Is this also a stalling technique by the family? If you don't release any photos that could be used to identify her, then technically she's almost invisible - was this one of her wishes to her family to allow her to get away and start a new life?

I think I go along with the theory that her friends helped her escape, but I do find it harder to believe that having escaped she would be back in touch with her parents, who would conspire to allow her to stay 'missing'.

Partly because it seems that they were quite invested in keeping up appearances. For them, I doubt her desire to start afresh would outweigh their desire to be free from the shadow of her disappearance.

But I may be misunderstanding what you are getting at.

Your point about the lack of follow up photos is excellent though. We don't really know what Ruth's face looks like. Those glasses are thick. Her hair is quite shielding. I think I would struggle to recognise her then, never mind thirty years later.

Sadly, I wonder if it's simple as the fact that there aren't that many photos of her available. Not all people are the type to record 'happy memories' even if there are some to record. And cameras/printing photos was more of a hassle in those days than it is now.
 
Something else which has struck me after reading the report on Page 1. Does anyone know where the florists is that she bought the flowers?
What is interesting (maybe) is that she was at the library, then at some point bought the flowers (no exact time though). But could she have bought the flowers before the library? Or did she nip out from the library and then go back?

What strikes me as strange is that the train station where she got her final taxi is further out (although not by much) than the main high street when going to Boxhill and, as I have been to Dorking a few times on the train, is set away from the town itself. In fact it's a bit of a walk out, not far, but certainly not right next to the town which does have taxi ranks and places you could call a cab. If I recall you have to cross a fairly busy road to get to the station and other than a pub there's not much around it. You really have to be going to the station to go near it if you see what I mean - although back in 1995 it may have been different.

Imo, as per my previous post, the whole taxi/Boxhill was a red herring. A good place for the focus to be on as she slipped out of town. Hence having a witness in the taxi driver, the notes etc. under the hedge.

I think the reason she ended up at the station was to check on train times, that the service was running and possibly get a ticket (did it have ticket machines in 1995?) certainly before all the info being on our mobile phones this would have been the only way to make sure that everything was ok before she went into the rest of the plan. Get to Boxhill, get picked up, dropped at the station and then get away almost straight away (any train enthusiasts have timetables from back then? Although being a commuter town and trains probably ran quite regularly, I bet there was a train about 5 - 5:30ish from either Dorking or Betchworth)

It would've been a problem had she got there and found that there were train delays/cancellations which would've meant that she had to hang around and be spotted - or had to find somewhere else to go. Remembering that as soon as whoever had picked her up had left, there was no way to contact them before mobiles.

I'm guessing it was Dorking station, but could've been Betchworth, nearer to Boxhill. If she had been stuck there, then it would've meant a hike back into town, or another taxi, both of which would've scuppered her plan.
 
Last edited:
I'm reposting the link to the official Facebook here, because there are some new and interesting comments, some made by people who knew Ruth, regarding those sightings back in the days after she went missing.


I am not allowed to post the comments here, but they are worth checking out.
 
I think I go along with the theory that her friends helped her escape, but I do find it harder to believe that having escaped she would be back in touch with her parents, who would conspire to allow her to stay 'missing'.

Partly because it seems that they were quite invested in keeping up appearances. For them, I doubt her desire to start afresh would outweigh their desire to be free from the shadow of her disappearance.

But I may be misunderstanding what you are getting at.

Your point about the lack of follow up photos is excellent though. We don't really know what Ruth's face looks like. Those glasses are thick. Her hair is quite shielding. I think I would struggle to recognise her then, never mind thirty years later.

Sadly, I wonder if it's simple as the fact that there aren't that many photos of her available. Not all people are the type to record 'happy memories' even if there are some to record. And cameras/printing photos was more of a hassle in those days than it is now.

True - it is only my thoughts. But who knows what else has happened in the last 30 years. It may have been a while before she reached out to her parents (I strongly agree that her friends helped though - the whole thing is possible, but not with out help) and it may have been a letter or phone call letting them know she was ok. By then she was an adult anyway. She may have said don't tell the police or anyone else and I'll come home when I'm ready, and if you do I won't. Or is it that if they did more questions would be thrown at them, be hounded by the media and therefore disrupt their lives. At the moment they can keep up appearances quite happily by never drawing attention to the case (they don't), give interviews (they don't) knowing that she's ok and that the shadow doesn't matter much when they don't need to deal with it. But again that's just my opinion.

It was more of a hassle, but we all did it because we didn't know any different. Although they may not have documented their lives, which I do get, why are there no later school photos? (which every school does annually), photos from friends, from the various groups / social activities she attended? Is it because her friends being involved in it were sworn never to release them?

It's true, her photos are so vague that you really wouldn't spot her in a crowd from them.
 
I'm reposting the link to the official Facebook here, because there are some new and interesting comments, some made by people who knew Ruth, regarding those sightings back in the days after she went missing.


I am not allowed to post the comments here, but they are worth checking out.
Vey interesting isn't it.

Two things - the girl who saw her walking back to Dorking from Brockham - I wonder what time? It's not that far from Betchworth Station.
Also the friend who allegedly had money thrown at him by her dad to tell him where she was. If he thought he'd done something to her, he'd told the police.
But he thought he was just in on helping her get away, she may have already have contacted her family and told them she was safe, but just not where.
Not wanting to make it public, due to reasons I've previously covered, or because Ruth told him not to, remember as well that police involvement may have resulted in media involvement too which may have spooked her and had her move on somewhere else where even friends wouldn't know (remember this is pre-internet and mobiles - where it was a letter or a phone call - and you had to make sure they were at home, so it could've been a while before she could disclose a new address) he wanted to get to her first and that's why he tried to bribe him.
 
Unless of course the family haven't disclosed it to the police. If Ruth had contacted them and said not to tell the police.

I had not thought of that. That might be why her dad did not want to cooperate with Martin Bright -- he didn't really want Martin digging and stirring up stuff, I can understand that in any case. If his understanding is that Ruth is safe and well somewhere, it would be a bad idea to have that dug up. He clearly didn't think that all the digging and attention would solve the case as it were.

'The blast from the past' line sounded like he'd just heard and old song on the radio. It could be he's moved on, it's been 30 years, but I would think that most people would've had a different reaction.

That is what made me suspicious that he might know something more. He and Ruth were close. I can imagine, although probably not fully, how painful it must have been for him if she had disappeared if he didn't know. Perhaps he feels that pain now and his reaction was to distance himself from that. In some ways you might move on and in others, you just would not and you might want to emotionally shield yourself. Regarding Catherine, she clearly cares deeply about Ruth and has been very affected by her disappearance and why that happened, and I can understand why she has gone to the media. I hope it helps.

I read a book by a woman called Shelley Mckenney (I think?) who ran away when she was in her early 20s from London to Birmingham to escape her family. It is worth reading for insights into being a missing person. Shelley was far more streetwise than Ruth and survived but it was a scary read. People -- men -- preyed on young women like Shelley and she escaped from one who drugged her and tried to traffic her. She had no recourse or defence because she was young and missing from home and wanted to avoid her family finding her. But she got jobs and eventually a home after having a baby. It made me think of Ruth and how life might not have been very easy for her at all if she did run away,she would have been extremely vulnerable.

And one other thing (I've been on here two days and I sound like Columbo!) don't you think it's strange that the family have never released more photos? There's some very dark, not clear pics of her on a beach, and then the other two which I would think are about 5+ years before she disappeared (the school photo in glasses and the one without glasses in her red top), and then it's just a side shot of here where she's got a can of beer in her hand.

As another poster suggested maybe Ruth didn't like having her photo taken.
Her parents putting out the photo of her in her school uniform where she looks very young was an odd choice but they are teachers and perhaps they wanted a photo that they thought represented Ruth. It is impossible to know. Maybe that is just the picture they had readily to hand in their distress.

What strikes me as strange is that the train station where she got her final taxi is further out (although not by much) than the main high street when going to Boxhill and, as I have been to Dorking a few times on the train, is set away from the town itself.

I think that the location of the station has changed since 1996 and that it used to be closer to the high street, or the location of the library has changed. One has changed. Another poster on here or Facebook explained it. Her choice of location for getting the taxi makes perfect sense then.
 
I had not thought of that. That might be why her dad did not want to cooperate with Martin Bright -- he didn't really want Martin digging and stirring up stuff, I can understand that in any case. If his understanding is that Ruth is safe and well somewhere, it would be a bad idea to have that dug up. He clearly didn't think that all the digging and attention would solve the case as it were.
And it just brings more media attention - if you have to admit now that you knew for a long time that she was ok, then people probably would be pi**ed off. There could be a wider family who don't know - they'd be pretty annoyed. Bet to say nothing. Plus with no appeals, no talking to the press etc. you can't be accused of wasting anyone's time.
That is what made me suspicious that he might know something more. He and Ruth were close. I can imagine, although probably not fully, how painful it must have been for him if she had disappeared if he didn't know. Perhaps he feels that pain now and his reaction was to distance himself from that. In some ways you might move on and in others, you just would not and you might want to emotionally shield yourself. Regarding Catherine, she clearly cares deeply about Ruth and has been very affected by her disappearance and why that happened, and I can understand why she has gone to the media. I hope it helps.

I read a book by a woman called Shelley Mckenney (I think?) who ran away when she was in her early 20s from London to Birmingham to escape her family. It is worth reading for insights into being a missing person. Shelley was far more streetwise than Ruth and survived but it was a scary read. People -- men -- preyed on young women like Shelley and she escaped from one who drugged her and tried to traffic her. She had no recourse or defence because she was young and missing from home and wanted to avoid her family finding her. But she got jobs and eventually a home after having a baby. It made me think of Ruth and how life might not have been very easy for her at all if she did run away,she would have been extremely vulnerable.
Well that depends. Ruth was a smart girl, she may have already sorted lodgings and a job. Back then it was so easy to get casual work and somewhere to live in London. The city wasn't like it is now, huge parts still had flats and houses full of youngsters sharing, either those working or studying in the city. It was a great time. This is before everything became gentrified. You could pick up a copy of Time Out or Loot or a free paper and there'd be loads of adverts for house shares. You'd bowl up, if the people who were there liked you you were in. You paid cash and that was it. Pub and cafe jobs were in abundance too, and most were cash in hand too. A lot of employers didn't need a NI number because you weren't on the books. Ruth had a personality years ahead of her age, was polite and well spoken and although people said she was shy, I bet she could've quite easily held a conversation - perfect traits for these kind of jobs. She may not have been earning a fortune, but she would've been safe and well.

Did she travel to London (or somewhere else - we presume London, but it could've been anywhere) in the weeks before she disappeared? We'll likely never know. Being a sixth former she didn't ned to go to school all day/every day, and had lots of social activities, so could've quite easily had sipped away for a few hours.

I get your point - but that's kids who run away with no money, and on the spur of the moment. This was a smart girl, who had probably been saving money (and may have borrowed from friends too) and this wasn't done on a whim, she would've spent a long time setting it up. When she left she knew she wasn't coming back.
As another poster suggested maybe Ruth didn't like having her photo taken.
Her parents putting out the photo of her in her school uniform where she looks very young was an odd choice but they are teachers and perhaps they wanted a photo that they thought represented Ruth. It is impossible to know. Maybe that is just the picture they had readily to hand in their distress.
Possibly - but don't the police always ask for a recent photo? Even her pic on the official missing poster is probably about 4 years old (if not more).
I think that the location of the station has changed since 1996 and that it used to be closer to the high street, or the location of the library has changed. One has changed. Another poster on here or Facebook explained it. Her choice of location for getting the taxi makes perfect sense then.
It was the library, and it has, but not by much. The high street would've been far quicker to get too, especially as it was cold and she had no coat. The station I believe had importance, that being she was checking on train info.
 
Sorry for the bumps on this thread, but my interest in this story has hit quite a peak and I'm seriously considering doing a bigger project on it. My mind has been turning over at a rate of knots, and there are several key points which I think could almost unravel the whole thing:

1). What was in those notes that were left? I doubt we'll find out due to the police not releasing them or even acknowledging their existence.

2). The ex-boyfriend Will. Not wanting to make accusations, but IMO he may know more. He and Ruth spent a lot of time in together in the last 48 hours before she disappeared. I think both of them knew why. My questions are though a). Did anyone else see him arrive at her house, to offer her a lift, on the morning she vanished? and b). what was his alibi for the evening after she got the taxi?

Again just IMO, but I think he probably did go to the house in the morning. And I think it was to check that everything else was ok for the rest of the day. There were no mobiles then, so they may have not wanted to talk on a landline in case anyone else could hear.
I believe she was picked up by someone not long after she was dropped off on Boxhill, taken to the train station and that's when she made her getaway. Now looking at maps, and my first hand knowledge of Dorking, it wouldn't have taken much more than half an hour to make that entire detour. If that was the case then whoever it was wouldn't have had to have much of an alibi to cover that time. Slight traffic delay, even changing the time when they left or arrived somewhere - there wouldn't have been any great discrepancy in the time to make a difference to their story. With no CCTV back then it would've been hard to track any exact movements.

The letters - now this really is just IMO. Read through my previous posts to see my thoughts on what was in those letters, and why I think they haven't been released. But if we say that the ex-boyfriend was the one who helped her getaway (and remember he had quite a bit of involvement in this due to the fact that he was with her when she went to get her mother's death certificate) then if one of the letters was to him then it could be to exonerate him from too much of an investigation afterwards - why write a letter to someone if you were with them when they vanished? It would certainly allow him to avoid too much focus - perhaps allowing him to even visit her.

This is JMO, but it would certainly all work. Plus you can almost see the logic behind it all. I have no doubt that her plan to leave was carefully formulated over a period of time to cover points like this.
 
Quick question as I keep getting different information. Can anyone tell me please when it is likely that Ruth found out the truth about her mother ie. when she went to London to view the death certificate?
Ok a little bit of trawling and I've found that it was early 1995 that she went to see the death certificate - could this be as early as January? This would give her 11 months nearly to plan her escape. By that time she had turned 16 so getting certain documents (a licence for a moped for example) would've been possible.
Could Christmas of 1994 have something to do with it? It can be a stressful time of the year for many - and when tempers can sometimes flare, also you have contact with family the most at this time of year - did a family member let something slip (a lot of alcohol consumption at Christmas time too).
Is the significance of running away in November so that she didn't want to go through another Christmas - or was the end of November 1994 when the truth was revealed? Making an early 1995 trip logical to find the death certificate. Was it her step-mum who was behind this earth shaking revelation, hence the flowers? So much to consider.
 
Sorry for the bumps on this thread, but my interest in this story has hit quite a peak and I'm seriously considering doing a bigger project on it. My mind has been turning over at a rate of knots, and there are several key points which I think could almost unravel the whole thing:

1). What was in those notes that were left? I doubt we'll find out due to the police not releasing them or even acknowledging their existence.

2). The ex-boyfriend Will. Not wanting to make accusations, but IMO he may know more. He and Ruth spent a lot of time in together in the last 48 hours before she disappeared. I think both of them knew why. My questions are though a). Did anyone else see him arrive at her house, to offer her a lift, on the morning she vanished? and b). what was his alibi for the evening after she got the taxi?

Again just IMO, but I think he probably did go to the house in the morning. And I think it was to check that everything else was ok for the rest of the day. There were no mobiles then, so they may have not wanted to talk on a landline in case anyone else could hear.
I believe she was picked up by someone not long after she was dropped off on Boxhill, taken to the train station and that's when she made her getaway. Now looking at maps, and my first hand knowledge of Dorking, it wouldn't have taken much more than half an hour to make that entire detour. If that was the case then whoever it was wouldn't have had to have much of an alibi to cover that time. Slight traffic delay, even changing the time when they left or arrived somewhere - there wouldn't have been any great discrepancy in the time to make a difference to their story. With no CCTV back then it would've been hard to track any exact movements.

The letters - now this really is just IMO. Read through my previous posts to see my thoughts on what was in those letters, and why I think they haven't been released. But if we say that the ex-boyfriend was the one who helped her getaway (and remember he had quite a bit of involvement in this due to the fact that he was with her when she went to get her mother's death certificate) then if one of the letters was to him then it could be to exonerate him from too much of an investigation afterwards - why write a letter to someone if you were with them when they vanished? It would certainly allow him to avoid too much focus - perhaps allowing him to even visit her.

This is JMO, but it would certainly all work. Plus you can almost see the logic behind it all. I have no doubt that her plan to leave was carefully formulated over a period of time to cover points like this.

I am glad for the bumps. Thirty years on from Ruth's disappearance it feels like this is a case that did not get enough attention or attempts to solve it at the time. Which makes it seem like there are possibilities which weren't exhausted.
 
I’m grateful for the bumps on this thread. But for some reason I’m not getting any notifications on them. I watch this thread, and I also spoke with one of the moderators about it, and they couldn’t seem to find anything wrong. But I think I might look into this further, because I don’t know why this keeps happening.

Nevertheless, I’m really happy to hear other people are still interested and haven’t forgotten about Ruth. I really hope one day we find out what happened to her.

I’m torn between wishful thinking (that she’s alive and happy out there), and Occam‘s razor.
 
I am glad for the bumps. Thirty years on from Ruth's disappearance it feels like this is a case that did not get enough attention or attempts to solve it at the time. Which makes it seem like there are possibilities which weren't exhausted.
Thank you. It's a case that has resonated with me because Ruth is the same age as me. I also know the Dorking area and I hope that this is actually one case where there may be a happy end result to it, if she was able to just make a fresh start somewhere else. I completely agree that perhaps not enough was done at the time, and I think that's because the truth is she did start a new life.
Maybe this year, on the 30th anniversary, Ruth might decide to end the years of wonder.
 
Thank you. It's a case that has resonated with me because Ruth is the same age as me. I also know the Dorking area and I hope that this is actually one case where there may be a happy end result to it, if she was able to just make a fresh start somewhere else. I completely agree that perhaps not enough was done at the time, and I think that's because the truth is she did start a new life.
Maybe this year, on the 30th anniversary, Ruth might decide to end the years of wonder.
It is a case that haunts you. Perhaps because there is a chance Ruth is out there somewhere. I hope she is safe and well.
 
Sorry for the bumps on this thread, but my interest in this story has hit quite a peak and I'm seriously considering doing a bigger project on it. My mind has been turning over at a rate of knots, and there are several key points which I think could almost unravel the whole thing:

1). What was in those notes that were left? I doubt we'll find out due to the police not releasing them or even acknowledging their existence.

2). The ex-boyfriend Will. Not wanting to make accusations, but IMO he may know more. He and Ruth spent a lot of time in together in the last 48 hours before she disappeared. I think both of them knew why. My questions are though a). Did anyone else see him arrive at her house, to offer her a lift, on the morning she vanished? and b). what was his alibi for the evening after she got the taxi?

Again just IMO, but I think he probably did go to the house in the morning. And I think it was to check that everything else was ok for the rest of the day. There were no mobiles then, so they may have not wanted to talk on a landline in case anyone else could hear.
I believe she was picked up by someone not long after she was dropped off on Boxhill, taken to the train station and that's when she made her getaway. Now looking at maps, and my first hand knowledge of Dorking, it wouldn't have taken much more than half an hour to make that entire detour. If that was the case then whoever it was wouldn't have had to have much of an alibi to cover that time. Slight traffic delay, even changing the time when they left or arrived somewhere - there wouldn't have been any great discrepancy in the time to make a difference to their story. With no CCTV back then it would've been hard to track any exact movements.

The letters - now this really is just IMO. Read through my previous posts to see my thoughts on what was in those letters, and why I think they haven't been released. But if we say that the ex-boyfriend was the one who helped her getaway (and remember he had quite a bit of involvement in this due to the fact that he was with her when she went to get her mother's death certificate) then if one of the letters was to him then it could be to exonerate him from too much of an investigation afterwards - why write a letter to someone if you were with them when they vanished? It would certainly allow him to avoid too much focus - perhaps allowing him to even visit her.

This is JMO, but it would certainly all work. Plus you can almost see the logic behind it all. I have no doubt that her plan to leave was carefully formulated over a period of time to cover points like this.
I agree with your line of thinking. I've often thought about the planning of it all, the coincidences and although it is possible Ruth came to harm, the info we know about all points towards a planned disappearance IMO.

I'm a similar age to Ruth and in the 90's it would have been relatively easy to obtain fake ID if needed. I know someone who left home around this time and got on to a ferry at Dover with no parents with him, and no questions were ever asked during the journey, despite being under 16.

I do wonder about Ruth's mother's family and whether she was in touch with them at any stage. Not suggesting they would have harboured her, but could she have found out something about her home life from them? Were they allowed regular contact with Ruth and Jenny after their mother's passing? It would help to build a better picture if more was known about that

I'm sure I've read that both Catherine's mum and Will's mum gave Ruth clothes. Could she have stored some of these in a bag/case ready for use when she disappeared? If her own clothes weren't missing from home, it would make sense that her parents would refute the suggestion she planned to disappear.

Someone on this thread asked me about the letters previously, but it's impossible to speculate on them as we haven't been made aware of the content. I agree she may have gone to Box Hill as it's possibly a meeting point for a lift to the train station. That does make sense to me. If she ended her own life there, why has no body been found? It's frequently visited and what with dog walkers, you'd think she would have been discovered by now if she was there.

All JMO, but I feel she disappeared of her own will with a little help and planning from someone who cared about her.
 
I agree with your line of thinking. I've often thought about the planning of it all, the coincidences and although it is possible Ruth came to harm, the info we know about all points towards a planned disappearance IMO.
I do genuinely believe that it was a planned disappearance
I'm a similar age to Ruth and in the 90's it would have been relatively easy to obtain fake ID if needed. I know someone who left home around this time and got on to a ferry at Dover with no parents with him, and no questions were ever asked during the journey, despite being under 16.
Absolutely - and for things such as work in small shops, cafes, bars etc. it was a very lax time. Before the good ol' debit card, it was all cash and employers of these establishments could keep a lot off the books. Having had a customer based job in the music shop, I think she wouldn't have had any problem being able to do a job elsewhere.
I do wonder about Ruth's mother's family and whether she was in touch with them at any stage. Not suggesting they would have harboured her, but could she have found out something about her home life from them? Were they allowed regular contact with Ruth and Jenny after their mother's passing? It would help to build a better picture if more was known about that
This is a very important point - it's never mentioned about that family.
I'm sure I've read that both Catherine's mum and Will's mum gave Ruth clothes. Could she have stored some of these in a bag/case ready for use when she disappeared? If her own clothes weren't missing from home, it would make sense that her parents would refute the suggestion she planned to disappear.
I've read that Will's mum gave her some old clothes, why exactly has never been fully explained, and the night before she vanished her and her sister dressed up in them and had a laugh at the awful fashion of them. Here's something interesting - in the Martin Bright documentary when he talks to Will, Ruth's dress sense is actually mentioned by Will. He says it was 'unconventional' - the old clothes she got, you're right could've been used by her. It would be a way in which she could get clothes without raising suspicion, or spending money. To be fair the clothes she got were probably 60's/70's fashions? And these were still fashionable in the mid-90s, particularly with young students etc.
Someone on this thread asked me about the letters previously, but it's impossible to speculate on them as we haven't been made aware of the content. I agree she may have gone to Box Hill as it's possibly a meeting point for a lift to the train station. That does make sense to me. If she ended her own life there, why has no body been found? It's frequently visited and what with dog walkers, you'd think she would have been discovered by now if she was there.
I have no doubt that if she had decided to end her life there her body would've been found. But I think it was a massive red herring. The paracetamol and vermouth bottle are one of two things - a token symbol to go along with what was in the letters, or a prop to make it look like suicide (I'm thinking more the latter) and the naivety shown by the 16 year old that paracetamol would do the job.
All JMO, but I feel she disappeared of her own will with a little help and planning from someone who cared about her.
Me too IMO she made her perfect getaway.
 
I do wonder about Ruth's mother's family and whether she was in touch with them at any stage. Not suggesting they would have harboured her, but could she have found out something about her home life from them? Were they allowed regular contact with Ruth and Jenny after their mother's passing? It would help to build a better picture if more was known about that
Nesta was adopted, and I think her adoptive parents might have passed away, so no contact. Martin Bright was trying to track them down.
 
Excuse me if this has already been answered but were search/cadaver dogs ever used on Box Hill to find her remains? Seems to me if she was there, LE would've found her had they used them. I've been reading lots of news stories about the case and not one has mentioned the use of trained dogs. Anyone know? IMO, she's out there, thanks to a little help from her friends at the start.
 

Keep Websleuths Free

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
72
Guests online
1,132
Total visitors
1,204

Forum statistics

Threads
618,737
Messages
18,388,562
Members
238,186
Latest member
SeleneWool
Back
Top