Found Deceased UK - Sarah Everard, 33, London - Clapham Common area, 3 March 2021 *Arrests* #10

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,321
Just thinking the horrifying details hinted at by a reporter on Twitter could also link to the findings on the SD card they retrieved? JMO
 
  • #1,322
Oh god. Do they think he brought her to the house.
Yes, I imagine the police are wondering whether WC took her to meet his children (head in hands emoji)
 
  • #1,323
Oh that is totally shameful. That is not what that event should have been. Sarah deserved to have her memory honoured and respected. I’m disgusted.

I agree, the feed is now focussed on a very small (vocal) section but they are now screaming at police and it is clear some are there just to attack them. Although it seems as if many people have moved on to other sections of the park / area to continue the peaceful, respectful side of things and separate themselves from those who are there for 'political' reasons.
 
  • #1,324
Thought it worth mentioning that from several photos and videos etc, there is a 2 story wooden house in WCs back garden, towards the back.

There is also a very small concrete ‘shed’ type thing that directly faces the back door of the property.
 
  • #1,325
You're now gonna tagged into UK threads every time someone goes missing at the seaside :)

That and any sort of water search...horrible to think of, but unfortunately yep. That's my area.

I've been following this case with the same sense of shock and anger as many of the posters here. I just really hope Sarah's family get some sort of justice, although I'm acutely aware that no justice will ever come close to making up for such a loss.
 
  • #1,326
The 5th may have been a significant date when something happened that made him panic and tell work he was suffering from stress. All pre-empting covering for himself. JMO, MOO
 
  • #1,327
Yes, I imagine the police are wondering whether WC took her to meet his children (head in hands emoji)
Wouldn't they be able to ask questions to the children? Or is it too sensitive of a matter/might reveal something they don't yet understand or know

I do think it's perhaps a bit of a stretch to think that he would have taken Sarah home/kept her there as they do have children and they could have noticed something odd and let it slip at school or the like
 
  • #1,328
Now this is interesting. I get the impression they are trying to make sure that the defence can’t say that they new each other and thats why her DNA was around. Double check that there isn’t a Neighbor that’s all of a sudden saying SE was banging his door down demanding to speak to his wife. I’m curious about that house now though.

It sounds like the other house is just being used for access to field/a base for officers.

From what we know about him/her/the case and from what @nottherealjoe (https://twitter.com/nottherealjoe) said about the court hearing this morning: "It was a horrifying and stressful court hearing. Very little can be reported now. What is alleged, what the press heard, was scary." - this case does not sound like a 'domestic' incident or where he has killed a spurned lover.
 
  • #1,329
Surely not though? With his wife and children at home? I’m veering towards just ensuring they can 100% eliminate that possibility.
I was thinking that too. The children would not be back to school yet (I know that WC could be classed as an essential worker, but what about EC). Plus if both wife and children at home, that more or less removes WCs ability to say as much.
 
  • #1,330
  • #1,331
Timing wise it does not seem like he could have been stopped there long enough for her to see the car and it seem believable it had broken down, re it seems more likely it would have come to a stop just ahead of her or along side her - so to then jump out and say he had broken down would be too unbelievable for her to stop and engage surely. The theory he stopped and showed his badge under the guise of lockdown rule breaking or that there has been an attack and the police are escorting lone females home/away from the area - seem more likely.

She wasn't breaking any rules by walking on her own so that doesn't make any sense. Also I don't think I've ever heard of police officers co-ordinating to escort people home.
 
  • #1,332
TfL-Southside Clapham Common 3rd March 21:06 - Looks like a white Astra, the car then indicates to go down Englewood Road...which leads onto A205 Poynders Road

https://livetrains.co.uk/jamCams/osm/#00001.04651

If it’s this one I think it’s a Honda Civic. But I wouldn’t hang my hat on it.

Edit: maybe a Prius, as rear lights don’t look right for a Civic unless one of the newer ones, but then the car doesn’t look angular enough for that. Regardless, hat still not hung so you could be right!
 
  • #1,333
WC looks absolutely huge in this photo, super strong and verging on obese. He's piled on about 50kgs in just a few years. Sarah would not have stood a chance if she fought back against him. MOO.

No, but she was a runner, I assume she would have been able to outrun him, which makes me think she wasn't scared/worried/intimidated by their interaction at first.
 
  • #1,334
When he was arrested he had bags protecting hands, maybe he hadn't showered?, or maybe then wanted to check under fingernails etc x

x[/QUOTE]
Or, as it was quite a few days since Sarah’s disappearance, to check for chemicals and other markers that might show he had been in contact with chemicals/fire or a dead body. God even saying that feels awful.
 
  • #1,335
When he was arrested he had bags protecting hands, maybe he hadn't showered?, or maybe then wanted to check under fingernails etc x

Yeah, this is correct. Bagging the hands can protect and preserve all kinds of trace evidence that might still be there e.g blood, fibres etc underneath fingernails.
 
  • #1,336
Yes, I imagine the police are wondering whether WC took her to meet his children (head in hands emoji)

Surely not :eek:

That can not be a serious line of enquiry, am I missing the sarcasm? They can't possibily think she was alive on the 5th and being taken to visit the family home
 
  • #1,337
I’m new to this site - I’ve been following the SE case and you all seem like an absolutely lovely group of people - such an incredibly sad chain of events - I can’t stop thinking about her poor poor family and how terrified she must have been.

The protest this evening is a difficult one - it’s a very very valid issue and discussion that needs to be raised in public. Sarah’s situation is obviously incredibly rare - but we definitely do live in a culture/society that contributes to individual acts of violence against women. It does seem ironic that so many rapists/sexual predators go unpunished whilst protestors are being handcuffed, but I do also understand that protests may be too soon and may be difficult (understandably) for Sarah’s family and friends at this point, as well as the obvious covid risk. Hopefully if anything Sarah’s death will mean offenses such as flashing are taken more seriously in the future, and such terrible crimes can in some way be prevented.
 
  • #1,338
Wouldn't they be able to ask questions to the children? Or is it too sensitive of a matter/might reveal something they don't yet understand or know

I do think it's perhaps a bit of a stretch to think that he would have taken Sarah home/kept her there as they do have children and they could have noticed something odd and let it slip at school or the like
Wouldn't they be able to ask questions to the children? Or is it too sensitive of a matter/might reveal something they don't yet understand or know

I do think it's perhaps a bit of a stretch to think that he would have taken Sarah home/kept her there as they do have children and they could have noticed something odd and let it slip at school or the like

Im almost certain they will have asked the children questions and shown a photo of Sarah and asked if they have ever seen her, asked them when they last saw Daddy, what mood he was in etc etc
 
  • #1,339

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210313_193626_com.huawei.videoeditor.jpg
    Screenshot_20210313_193626_com.huawei.videoeditor.jpg
    74.5 KB · Views: 300
  • #1,340
I am aware, yes. Your point? I was responding to the poster's feeling the courtroom reporting by the Scottish paper was possibly a 'mistake'.
I actually think the other poster maybe correct, but note, this is not my area of expertise.

Preliminary Hearings in Criminal Proceedings
There are many types of preliminary hearings in criminal legal proceedings e.g. bail hearings, committal, allocation or 'sending for trial' hearings when it is decided where the trial will take place. Such proceedings are normally held in public but what can be reported is severely restricted – only the 'bare bones' can be reported e.g. names of parties, offences, arrangements as to bail. Programme-makers must always seek advice from the programme lawyer before reporting on criminal legal proceedings.
Reporting Legal Proceedings | Channel 4
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
64
Guests online
2,405
Total visitors
2,469

Forum statistics

Threads
632,804
Messages
18,631,936
Members
243,297
Latest member
InternalExile
Back
Top