- Joined
- Jun 9, 2022
- Messages
- 447
- Reaction score
- 572
The transfer was done manually so human error has to be factored in.All the card index data was transferred to a computer based system at the outset of the 2000 review.
Last edited:
The transfer was done manually so human error has to be factored in.All the card index data was transferred to a computer based system at the outset of the 2000 review.
Yes the jogger sighting was in 2000, but MJ saw a young woman waiting outside 123, then a suntanned man aged 40-50 carrying a briefcase approach her (AS P76 and the Real Crime doc).The MJ was of a man only I think. The jogger sighting came in fourteen years later, IIRC.
Agreed......then again even today HOLMES2 relies on the manual data sets entered by HOLMES data inputters identifying data from statements, intelligence reports, CCTV etc.The transfer was done manually so human error as to be factored in.
Yes the jogger sighting was in 2000, but MJ saw a young woman waiting outside 123, then a suntanned man aged 40-50 carrying a briefcase approach her (AS P76 and the Real Crime doc).
This is the problem I have - the info from the stocktaker and ZH in the DV book both suggest that it was open. The stocktaker makes the point that they would go in early so as to be finished before twelve for the pub to open as normal at lunchtime - otherwise the brewery/pubco is losing revenue.
FWIW the handwriting on the diary page is by the same person. It looks like the Mr Kipper appointment & the 6.00pm appointments were written at the same time.I have strong doubts that she went to Shorrolds Road, a large part due to the fact I am far from convinced that it was her who made the relevant diary entry as I think that there is a handwriting style discrepancy between that entry and the one lower down the page, the fact that apparently there was no regular estate agency card written out for this appointment and the seemingly baffling choice of client name if Suzy was trying to cover an against-the-rules absence from the office.
FWIW the handwriting on the diary page is by the same person. It looks like the Mr Kipper appointment & the 6.00pm appointments were written at the same time.
However, the other notes on the page were written at a different time.
This is a minor point, but has implications if correct, so an expert’s opinion would be welcome.
Agreed it’s a very odd name to use, suggests that (maybe) she was making it obvious that she was going out on a personal errand.I know this is old ground (I’m mostly a lurker on this thread) but…
what do people mostly think / conclude about the name itself ‘Mr Kipper’?
To me, it’s still very odd that SJL uses that word / name when having had a school friend who was teased with that. It’s hardly the sort of word / name that rolls into one’s mind when making an excuse to dip out of work. IMO maybe it could be a bigger clue than we realise and I don’t mean that directed to that person with the nickname but that it’s rather odd in its own right.
K i P p e rI know this is old ground (I’m mostly a lurker on this thread) but…
what do people mostly think / conclude about the name itself ‘Mr Kipper’?
To me, it’s still very odd that SJL uses that word / name when having had a school friend who was teased with that. It’s hardly the sort of word / name that rolls into one’s mind when making an excuse to dip out of work. IMO maybe it could be a bigger clue than we realise and I don’t mean that directed to that person with the nickname but that it’s rather odd in its own right.
Dont you think it is odd for this couple to turn up at these locations? If this couple was trying to find her, why would SJL go to 123 Stevenage Rd?
If you check out the police incident room white board (photo posted a few pages back) you will notice KIPPER/SKIPPER where someone pointed out she knew a guy that worked at the bbc in Bristol whose name was Skipper apparrently he was eliminated from enquiry.I know this is old ground (I’m mostly a lurker on this thread) but…
what do people mostly think / conclude about the name itself ‘Mr Kipper’?
To me, it’s still very odd that SJL uses that word / name when having had a school friend who was teased with that. It’s hardly the sort of word / name that rolls into one’s mind when making an excuse to dip out of work. IMO maybe it could be a bigger clue than we realise and I don’t mean that directed to that person with the nickname but that it’s rather odd in its own right.
Where is the evidence for this please?SJL did have a fondness for giving people nicknames
SJL worked with many property agents. So it might explain couples at both locations.Dont you think it is odd for this couple to turn up at these locations? If this couple was trying to find her, why would SJL go to 123 Stevenage Rd?
In the AS book.Where is the evidence for this please?
No....it's not available within my library network. I checked the other day.In the AS book.
Have you read it?
Im quite surprised you have not read the AS book its a must read for anyone interested in the SJL case and well worth the moneyNo....it's not available within my library network. I checked the other day.
What I would say though is unless AS knew SJL personally, and she told him so, then it is hearsay and hence not reliable.
If friends/family told AS so, after SJL went missing, then it may carry some weight, but only if they told him independently of each other, without prompting or as a response to leading questions.
This I fear is how we are fed so much 'information' that is stated as fact, when it is just not the case and therefore it cannot be relied on in any way to advance an investigation.
I think it is highly unlikely, given the passage of time, that anyone is going to reveal key evidence that will help to solve this tragic case. I cannot begin to imagine the lifelong anguish when a loved family member/friend disappears without trace.
The greatest hope is that a body is found and identified by DNA/dental records as Suzy. This may not solve the case, but at least she can be brought home and laid to rest properly.
Sadly its not available on Kindle unlimited, does it vary much from DV's book ?Im quite surprised you have not read the AS book its a must read for anyone interested in the SJL case and well worth the money
But from memory Splodge, and Biffo come to mind.
Bolded bit, given the police conducted digs around likely places (to them at least) linked to JC without so much as a trace of Suzi would it not make sense to at least search the voids under the POW pub .No....it's not available within my library network. I checked the other day.
What I would say though is unless AS knew SJL personally, and she told him so, then it is hearsay and hence not reliable.
If friends/family told AS so, after SJL went missing, then it may carry some weight, but only if they told him independently of each other, without prompting or as a response to leading questions.
This I fear is how we are fed so much 'information' that is stated as fact, when it is just not the case and therefore it cannot be relied on in any way to advance an investigation.
I think it is highly unlikely, given the passage of time, that anyone is going to reveal key evidence that will help to solve this tragic case. I cannot begin to imagine the lifelong anguish when a loved family member/friend disappears without trace.
The greatest hope is that a body is found and identified by DNA/dental records as Suzy. This may not solve the case, but at least she can be brought home and laid to rest properly.