UK UK - Suzy Lamplugh, 25, Fulham, 28 July 1986 #8

[lee sumner]

Occams razor is usually the answer, the puzzle as we all know is who was the elusive Kipper.

mr kipper is a ghost. iam 50/50 its JC. i was convinced he was the notorious mr kipper when i first started researching this case, but now iam not so sure.

 

[lee sumner]

Or that Mr Kipper was an estate agent who she was familiar with from another branch, and she was looking to buy i.e. he was the seller.

I'll scratch your back, if you scratch mine sceneario.


That would then make Mr Kipper a dodgy estate agent

yes, what you say about mr kipper being an a estate agent crossed my mind many times. i did wonder was he a sturgis negotiator like lamplugh, but from another branch in SW london. i will go and check how many sturgis officers were based in SW london.

 

[lee sumner]

I was looking at sl entry in the desk diary and it looks like the address was an afterthought or added?? The way sl entered other things were different to that entry jmo

RE, entry. different in what way.

 

[lee sumner]

She writes "O/S" for 37SR - outside - iirc for the later viewing she just gives the address and name of the viewer. Is this significant? Perhaps Kipper really did only want to see outside (although JMO I can't really see why). It lends some weight to the notion that she may not have taken the key as not intending to go inside.

the O/S in entry means meeting client outside. sounds like normal procedure to me.

 

[lee sumner]

the O/S in entry means meeting client outside. sounds like normal procedure to me.

as for the keys. she took them and paperwork.

 

[Kasparthecat1]

as for the keys. she took them and paperwork.

Yeah I think this is the more likely scenario too. Just pondering why she wrote O/S for 37SR and not for the later appointment.