I have so many issues with this case. I'm not saying that he's innocent (because he isn't, obviously). But several things make me have a hard time believing he did
everything he is accused of,
alone.
Detective Inspector Caroline Corfield, who led the murder inquiry, says Viktorija's murderer was clearly forensically aware and decided to dispose of bloodstained clothing, including a pair of Adidas Gazelle training shoes.
So, he was enough "forensically aware" to dispose of several items, including the murder weapon, but didn't think about avoiding CCTV cameras on his way to and back from the park where she was murdered? I know he was wearing a hoodie, but why not take a different route without so much exposure to CCTV (to be honest, I don't know if that was even possible, maybe he didn't really have any other ways to get into the park, but I'm sure there are places in Wolverhampton without that much CCTV coverage), if he was already planning to go out of his way to bring extra clothes AND shoes, and to dispose of the items he was wearing during the crime, afterwards? Also, he wasn't enough "forensically aware" to delete his Facebook account and Facebook Messenger, instead, he simply deleted the messages he had sent her on Facebook Messenger, which does literally nothing because those messages would still be available on her account. Not many 16-year-olds are unaware of this, these kids live on social media, they know this stuff.
Viktorija's white jeans and bloodstained underwear, as well as a sock, were found dumped in a litter bin near the boating lake.
Her mobile phone had been hurled onto an island on the lake, adjacent to a pavilion in which she was raped and beaten.
He went to great lenghts to dispose of his stuff, and he did it so well that LE can't even find anything to this day. But left all of her stuff in the park and didn't even make an effort to hide her body. That doesn't make much sense, at least not to me.
00.44am: CCTV spots the boy still in a hooded jacket, Adidas trainers and carrying a backpack but wearing different coloured trousers.
He left the park wearing the same shoes and the same hoodie. He just changed his pants. If he killed her like the investigation alleges he did, his hoodie and shoes had to be full of blood.
Anyways, I'm not defending anyone. And certainly not this guy. But, to me, it doesn't seem very plausible that he did everything he was accused of, alone. Some things don't really add up. I believe someone else was there or, at the very least, that someone helped him dispose of his clothes and shoes. I don't know of many 16-year-old boys willing to give up their fancy shoes, he could have washed them, but something about the shoes clearly worried him to the point of him making it disappear, and he obviously had her blood at least on the soles because LE found his shoeprints on her blood. If we didn't have his name, or any name, if we didn't have anyone I would immediately think of 3-5 teenage males of doing this. And the several semen samples found on her just make me believe that even more. She's 14-years-old, how sexual active could she be? I mean, kids start exploring their sexuality really early, but how many 14-year-old girls (or boys, for that matter) are having sex with several people so close together, like with several boys on the same day? As a 14-year-old? I don't know, man. What I know is that Viktorija was sexually abused and brutally murder, and if he is the sole responsible, then so be it, he will pay for what he did. But if someone else participated in this disgusting crime, they need to pay too. No matter how troubled she was, no matter how she behaved, she didn't deserve to suffer in any way, let alone how much she suffered. I am also very sorry that this poor girl didn't feel happy at her own home, and we all know that some teenagers go crazy on their parents sometimes and feel like their parents are ruining their lives, but the way she spoke about her home life, the times she tried to run away... it doesn't strike me as teenage rebellion. Poor girl.