SOLVED Unknown child found 6/20/25 Baltimore MD

  • #21
I always notice that the timestamp of the original post usually remains when there is an update.
That seems like it could lead to issues .Just saying.
Because people may dismiss updates as 2 days old. IMO
I know it is computer programming issues. But they are kinda lies..
sigh...
 
  • #22
1750593665423.webp

Is this the child you're referring to that was located? There were 2 missing at the same time and this isn't the one I orginally posted. I just want to make sure, I still can't find an update with the exact picture. TIA
 
  • #23
View attachment 597112
Is this the child you're referring to that was located? There were 2 missing at the same time and this isn't the one I orginally posted. I just want to make sure, I still can't find an update with the exact picture. TIA

The news article that was linked was referring to the little girl who was found on Friday (the subject of this thread.) The little girl pictured above, in this post, was found in May. On the original WMAR post, they were updating their post about the little girl found on June 20, but they have now deleted the original post and have left only the update. The Baltimore City PD has also removed their posts regarding the subject of this thread (from June 20.) They apparently want to keep all information about her private.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
54
Guests online
1,635
Total visitors
1,689

Forum statistics

Threads
636,209
Messages
18,692,709
Members
243,563
Latest member
rollingbunny
Back
Top