US threatens to annex Greenland - 2025/2026

  • #401
France's Finance Minister Roland Lescure said he would convene a meeting of his counterparts from the Group of Seven (G7) countries to discuss trade and sovereignty "in the coming days".

"We are fully supportive of Greenland and Denmark," Mr Lescure said. "Blackmail between friends is obviously unacceptable."

 
  • #402

Kremlin says Trump would go down in world history if US took Greenland​

By Reuters
January 19, 202610:21 AM GMTUpdated 7 mins ago



Danish soldiers take pictures next to the statue of Hans Egede, at Nuuk's old harbour

'Danish soldiers take pictures next to the statue of Hans Egede, at Nuuk's old harbour, Greenland, January 18, 2026. REUTERS/Marko Djurica Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
MOSCOW, Jan 19 (Reuters) - The Kremlin said on Monday that it was hard to disagree with experts who said that U.S. President Donald Trump would go down in the history of the United States and the world if he took control of Greenland.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he was not discussing whether such a step would be good or bad - simply stating a fact.'

And that's what Trump wants.
 
  • #403
And what about tiny places, like Monaco, for instance? Doesn't Donald feel a psychological need to add that nice little bit of real estate too his portfolio?
Monaco has a profitable passport selling business. So, yes.

MOO
 
  • #405

Kremlin says Trump would go down in world history if US took Greenland​

By Reuters
January 19, 202610:21 AM GMTUpdated 7 mins ago



Danish soldiers take pictures next to the statue of Hans Egede, at Nuuk's old harbour's old harbour

'Danish soldiers take pictures next to the statue of Hans Egede, at Nuuk's old harbour, Greenland, January 18, 2026. REUTERS/Marko Djurica Purchase Licensing Rights, opens new tab
MOSCOW, Jan 19 (Reuters) - The Kremlin said on Monday that it was hard to disagree with experts who said that U.S. President Donald Trump would go down in the history of the United States and the world if he took control of Greenland.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he was not discussing whether such a step would be good or bad - simply stating a fact.'

And that's what Trump wants.
He’s going down in world history anyway - for all the wrong reasons. MOO
 
  • #406
What is the EU's anti-coercion 'bazooka' it could use against US?

... Referred to as a "bazooka" or "nuclear" option, the instrument is intended to deter economic coercion against any of the EU's 27 member states.

The EU defines coercion as a third country "applying - or threatening to apply - measures affecting trade or investment", thereby interfering "with the legitimate sovereign choices" of the EU and member states.

What does the instrument do?

The armoury allows the EU to take measures such as import and export restrictions on goods and services in its single market of 450 million people.

It also gives Brussels the power to limit US companies' access to public procurement contracts in Europe...

... A major target could be American tech giants since the United States has a services surplus with the EU.

Brussels previously drew up a list of US services to potentially target.

The instrument's creation came after Lithuania accused China of banning its exports because Vilnius allowed a Taiwanese diplomatic representation to be opened on its soil in 2021...

 
  • #407
<Modsnip: Politicization>


"Among the eight countries facing a new threat of tariffs is Norway. Trump has told Norway's prime minister he no longer feels obligated "to think purely of Peace" because he had not been awarded the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize, and he repeated his demand for control of Greenland.​
"Considering your ‍Country decided not ⁠to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped 8 Wars PLUS, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of Peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the ⁠United States of America," Trump wrote in the letter.​
...​
Norway's Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere had repeatedly told Trump that the Norwegian Nobel Committee, which awards the peace prize, is ‍independent and that Norway's government has no control over it.​
...​
In his letter, Trump again questioned Danish sovereignty over Greenland, saying, "Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China, and why do they ‍have a 'right of ownership' anyway? "There are no written documents, it's only that a boat landed there hundreds of years ago, ‍but we had ⁠boats landing there, also."​
...​
Russia's ⁠foreign ministry said that it was unacceptable for the West to keep claiming that Russia and China were a threat to Greenland.​
In Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said the Chinese government was urging the U.S. to "stop using the so-called threat from China as a pretext to pursue its own selfish interests.​
...​
"I believe that the Europeans will understand that this ⁠is best for Greenland, best for Europe and best for the United States," said U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent"​

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #408

'Europe is at a total loss': Russia gloats over Greenland tensions​


Steve Rosenberg
Russia Editor

44 minutes ago
'Listen to Donald Trump and you would think Moscow and Beijing were lying in wait off the coast of Greenland, ready to pounce to boost their power in the Arctic.
"There are Russian destroyers, there are Chinese destroyers and, bigger, there are Russian submarines all over the place," President Trump said recently.

That is why, according to America's president, US control of Greenland is essential.

So how do you think Moscow has reacted to its alleged plot being uncovered and potentially thwarted by a US takeover of Greenland?

The Russians can't be pleased. Right?

Wrong.'

(Read why in the linked article!)
 
  • #409
Nothing new under the sun

 
  • #411

'Europe is at a total loss': Russia gloats over Greenland tensions​


Steve Rosenberg
Russia Editor

44 minutes ago
'Listen to Donald Trump and you would think Moscow and Beijing were lying in wait off the coast of Greenland, ready to pounce to boost their power in the Arctic.
"There are Russian destroyers, there are Chinese destroyers and, bigger, there are Russian submarines all over the place," President Trump said recently.

That is why, according to America's president, US control of Greenland is essential.

So how do you think Moscow has reacted to its alleged plot being uncovered and potentially thwarted by a US takeover of Greenland?

The Russians can't be pleased. Right?

Wrong.'

(Read why in the linked article!)
Just as Russia applauded the release of the National Security Strategy of November 2025 (based on ideology from 1823), Russia applauds the invasion of Greenland.

US boots on the ground aggression towards Greenland means that NATO is dissolved. That's a major win for Russia. It allows Russia to march across Europe.

The US government probably believes that Russia is in favour of three major world powers: Russia, China, United States, and the United States will be a bigger biggest bestest world player.

Without NATO, it's also possible that Russia will take Europe - all of it including Greenland - Canada will remain Canada, and the United States will be the United States with some police state influence in South America. Once the United States is weakened, reduced to existing territory with some influence in South America, it's open season for Russia and China.

If this was a win for the United States, Russia would not be encouraging the United States to annex a NATO country ... but I don't think the United States understands this.

~ in my humble opinion ~
 
  • #413
New military exercise at Amsterdam international airport at the end of the month.

"Anyone who hears the sound of fighter jets over Schiphol next week needn't think of a military invasion by a foreign power. The Royal Netherlands Air Force will be conducting its first training exercises from the national airport.

Four F-35 fighter jets and a transport and tanker aircraft will be deployed, arriving and departing at different times. The tanker aircraft is part of the Multinational MRTT Unit. This is a NATO fleet used for refueling other aircraft in mid-air, as well as for transporting people and cargo.
...

The exercise is intended to examine how military flights can be conducted safely and responsibly from an airport that is not normally used for military purposes."

 
  • #414
But Russia is involved in a pretty nasty war with Ukraine. Are they really in a position to march across Europe?
NATO, and the Coalition of the Willing, are the barriers between Russia and Ukraine. The US has withdrawn, resulting in the Coalition of the Willing - who purchase military equipment from the United States.
 
  • #415
NATO, and the Coalition of the Willing, are the barriers between Russia and Ukraine. The US has withdrawn, resulting in the Coalition of the Willing - who purchase military equipment from the United States.
Not being snarky, but that doesn’t really answer my question. I still don’t understand how Russia could march across Europe.
 
  • #416
Greenland is important to Europe and Canada's collective security. That's a fact.

<modsnip: Politicization>


"Donald Trump continues to increase pressure regarding Greenland, and the link he's making to the missed Nobel Peace Prize "gives some insight into Trump's psyche," says US correspondent Thomas De Graeve on VRT NWS Journaal. "Trump doesn't feel recognized for his achievements."
...

Secretary General, Mark Rutte: “We talked about how important the Arctic is to our collective security."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #418
Not being snarky, but that doesn’t really answer my question. I still don’t understand how Russia could march across Europe.

Well, there is strong evidence that Russia is working on disrupting communications across the Baltic Sea, and they already have a port bordering on that region in St Petersburg, and the tiny Russian-controlled territory of Kaliningrad.

It would seem they do have ambitions to control part of the North Sea and the adjacent Arctic from the Murmansk area east of Finland.

This is Exactly why NATO is important. Having Greenland does not solve any security issues for the US or for Europe. The NATO Arctic Security block is what is needed.
 
  • #419
If the US attacks Europe via Greenland, then Europe and the US are no longer aligned. NATO will be dissolved.

If the Coalition of the Willing purchases military equipment from the US, and the US becomes a hostile nation to Europe, where will military equipment for Ukraine come from?
Hopefully another nation will step up, but I don’t see that happening. MOO
 
  • #420
Well, there is strong evidence that Russia is working on disrupting communications across the Baltic Sea, and they already have a port bordering on that region in St Petersburg, and the tiny Russian-controlled territory of Kaliningrad.

It would seem they do have ambitions to control part of the North Sea and the adjacent Arctic from the Murmansk area east of Finland.

This is Exactly why NATO is important. Having Greenland does not solve any security issues for the US or for Europe. The NATO Arctic Security block is what is needed.

That’s it. Putin wants Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.

Germany and Russia signing a pact to invade and divide European countries such as the Baltic States above are part of what started WWII.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
151
Guests online
1,751
Total visitors
1,902

Forum statistics

Threads
638,342
Messages
18,726,625
Members
244,389
Latest member
ArchivesAfterDark
Back
Top