US threatens to annex Greenland - 2025/2026

  • #21
I was wondering if that is what the "20 days" is about. See how they go with Venezuela, and if the world doesn't kick up too much of a fuss then go for Greenland.


"Let's talk about Greenland in 20 days," Mr Trump said on Sunday


And that makes it legal? Declaring that no one will fight over Greenland?

To date, at least 115 Venezuelans have been killed by the US military forces in 2025.

Is Europe going to ignore the unjustified deaths of a similar number of Greenlanders, without any action?
 
  • #22
The United States needs to take care of the Veterans it already has, not create more. IMO.
 
Last edited:
  • #23
As soon as the US government threatened Canada and the Panama Canal, it was obvious that the US wants full control and authority over global trade routes and shipping lanes. The US wants to be the middle-man with global trade, to take a tax on all goods that move between borders.

The reason that the US wants Canada and Greenland is here (see illustration). The red route borders Russia, the green route borders Canada and Greenland. The blue route does not yet exist.

The US currently has no impactful authority or significant border in the Arctic region. The US is threatened because other countries, such as Canada, can establish major trade routes East and West that bypass the US. South America has already established trade routes that bypass the US (e.g.: China via Peru shipping ports).

Although the US appears to be bankrupt and unable to purchase natural resources from sovereign countries, such as Greenland and Venezuela, that is not primary reason for the US attempting to seize sovereign nations. The primary reason appears to be control of global trade routes.

Venezuela is the point of access from the US to South America, Greenland is the centre of trade from Canada to all points East. The US needs Greenland to be a major player in the Arctic region.

The US recognizes that other countries can and will bypass US trade relationships (due to tariff taxes). The only way for the US to remain relevant is to so seize strategically located sovereign nations, to control trade routes, to impose transport tax ... and the bonus is that the US can steal, rather than purchase, natural resources from sovereign nations.

1767793398158.webp


~ in my humble opinion ~
 
  • #24
This is about the Transpolar Sea Route in the Arctic.

Russia, China and Canada also have interest in this region for shipping.

The first link explains things in detail. The other 3 links are just added for context. MOO







 
  • #25
Northwest Passage
1767800050087.webp



Transpolar Sea Route (yellow route): does not exist, melt may open the route in 2050. Northwest Passage green, and Russian purple, routes are used today.

1767800321333.webp


Is it wise to bust up the arctic ice cap?
 
  • #26
Northwest Passage
View attachment 635631


Transpolar Sea Route (yellow route): does not exist, melt may open the route in 2050. Northwest Passage green, and Russian purple, routes are used today.

View attachment 635633

Is it wise to bust up the arctic ice cap?
The ghost of Henry Hudson awakens!

jmopinion
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
218
Guests online
1,665
Total visitors
1,883

Forum statistics

Threads
637,126
Messages
18,709,923
Members
244,050
Latest member
Tvscreens
Back
Top