Vegas Bride
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2006
- Messages
- 3,032
- Reaction score
- 58
I didn't want to just thank you for your post but for your signature line. It is so true. Just because you want to be with a guy doesn't mean that can or will be a father to your child. This case (and too many others) remind us of that.
Thank you for saying that DairyGirl!
It's something I feel very strongly about.
I've reached beyond my limit of reading story after story about sweet innocent children who are simply thrown to the wolves because Mommy Or Daddy are only wanting what they want and not what their children need.
I know there are some great people out there who can find it in their heart to care for anothers child but..... IMO the risk is to big to take the chance. There's just some kind of sick thinking in some men who view a woman's child as the enemy, this is also true for some women who can't stand to share "their man" with his child.
One thing I like to suggest to someone is to think about having a stack of 100 dollar bills. Would they leave the house with them sitting on the table with your boyfriend alone with them.
Now if they say they would not do that, why in the world do they think they can trust that same person with such a precious life?
Stephanie knew what she was doing when she brought Ethan to that apartment of hell, she did it willingly. If she had 1 oz of caring for him she would have walked away and let him have his life with his father. Selfish and Evil combined.
Have we seen 1 bruise on her from fighting to save her baby? Do we see any sign of tears shed for the mourning she's done?
I hate her I think even more than I hate



So what if Ethan died, after all she could always have another right, what's the difference between that or the ones she miscarried. Plus it was a way to strike out at her ex.
VB