UT - Kouri Richins, 33, Author, wife, mom, charged in husband’s unexpected death last year, May 2023 #3

A motion hearing is scheduled to begin @ 10:30 am MT.

PARK CITY, Utah (KUTV) — Attorneys for accused murderer Kouri Richins' are in court Thursday to ask the judge to suppress key evidence in her case, including electronic data, statements made to police, and documents seized from her jail cell.




1/23/2025
 
@HiddenTrueCrime


Court is in session for the Kouri Richins hearing. I am present in court and will be live tweeting during the hearing

The state would like to admit multiple exhibits for this hearing only

First Witness is Detective Maynard

On the day of the arrest he followed Kouri leaving her home, and initiated a traffic stop. He asked her to step out of her vehicle to detain her. He did so because he wanted to preserve evidence and her cell phone was in the car, which he believed was evidence

He realized he did not have his body camera, so he used his cell phone camera as he talked with her in his patrol vehicle

Detective says he did not observe Kouri crying during the interview in the car

Another Detective, detective Woody, joined him and collected Kouri's cellphone and gave it to him

He then left and went to the house. After the traffic stop, Kouri was no longer detained. She returned to the house awhile later and said that she needed to get some numbers from her cellphone. Kouri gave the detective her phone password.

The detective provided Kouri with phone numbers out of her phone


CORRECTION: Kouri was arrested on May 8th, less than a month after this traffic stop.

The defense is now crossing the Detective

They are discussing the search warrant from April 13th. The detective was in an unmarked police car when he initiated the stop

When he stopped Kouri, he approached her and said he was detaining her for a minute. He remembers the phone was in her lap at that point. He asked her to step out and go to his car with him. Kouri got out, and her phone was left in the car as well as her car keys

Detective acknowledges that he never read Kouri her Miranda rights while she was in his car.
 
@HiddenTrueCrime

Up next, Witness #2 today, Detective Woody. Prosecutor Bloodworth is doing direct

On the morning of April 13th, after learning a traffic stop was made, she headed over there. When she got there, Kouri was in the front passenger seat of Detective Maynards car. Det. Woody did an audio recording of the encounter.


She testifies Kouri was not in handcuffs and was not placed under arrest. She did not observe any tears, but Kouri sounded like she was crying.


She asked Kouri if she wanted to come with her and grab her cellphone. Kouri reached in and grabbed the phone before handing it to Detective Woody.

She asked Kouri if she wanted to take it out of the case or not. This is something she usually asks incase there are cards, drivers licenses, etc within the case. Kouri did not want to remove the case and handed her phone over.

After the audio recording and traffic stop, she went to Beckys house. Becky was an employee of Erics and there were electronics they were interested in recovering. The house was within walking distance.

After, she went back to the Richins home. Kouri was there and was asking her questions about the warrant, what they were looking for, and what they found.


Atty Kathy Nester doing cross.

Detective Woody confirms she was the one who went to the judge for the search warrant.

2 warrants were obtained. 1 authorized a search for fentanyl or any tracking or mailing. The other was for electronics.

In the middle of the initial search warrant being enforced, Is when she went to the judge and asked for a search warrant for vehicle. Det. Woody confirms that at the time she got Kouri's phone she did not have a warrant to search the vehicle. But she says Kouri got the phone

She told Kouri the purpose of the search was to make sure there is nothing there and nothing dangerous for her and the kids. She was referring to fentanyl.


Detective Woody confirms she did not read Miranda Rights to Kouri while she was detained during the traffic stop. She knew Kouri had a lawyer because she had talked to Kouri about interviewing before. But she did not tell Kouri that day she had a right to call her lawyer.


Back to talking about the phone: When she arrived at the Richins, she got the phone back at some point and put it into evidence. While at the house, she asked Kouri if she would provide the code or open the safes so they wouldn't have to damage them.


Kouri was asking Detective Woody questions about if they had found any fentanyl.

Atty Nester is going after credibility by asking Det. Woody if she knew the Richins before this happened. She said she did not.

Atty Nester is saying that they plan to challenge the sixth amendment rights later today based on O'Driscolls interview of Kouri when her attorney said not to question her. Prosecution argues there was no judicial case happening at that point, so 6th amendment is not relevant

Atty Nester clarifies with Detective Woody that she is just a Deputy at this point. We will begin referring to her as Deputy Woody from this point.

There is written correspondence of Kouri's attorney to Deputy Woody saying that Kouri should not be questioned outside the presence of an attorney anymore. Generally correspondence like that goes into a case file. She believes she put that into the case file.

Deputy Woody left the case to train her K9 dog, because she needed more time.
 
@HiddenTrueCrime


3rd Witness on the stand will be Lead Crime Scene Investigator

Cross By Atty Nester: Gibson says she manages evidence room for Summit County Sheriff. After phone was placed in evidence locker by the detective, she officially took it into evidence.


They discussed the chain of custody of the phone as it was sent back and forth to clarify it. Gibson was at the scene on the day of the search warrant. Kouri's phone is listed in documentation without a location of where it was found.


Prosecutor Bloodworth is now up, talking about the computer forensics lab who extracted the phone. The extraction was transferred back to Summit County Sheriffs office on a hard drive. SCSO couldn't look at the hard drive for a while because they didn't have the capabilities


Timeline confirmed on stand:
May 2022- phone sent to forensics lab
July 2022- Hard drive sent to Sheriff's office
Then it took awhile to have capabilities to look at hard drive.
Gibson is released from the stand. There is now an hour lunch break.

 
@cathyrusson


Kouri Richins in court today. Judge is not allowing live streaming but we will publish the hearing after.

1737663135121.png
2:42 PM · Jan 23, 2025
 
@HiddenTrueCrime


Back for the afternoon session in the Kouri Richins evidentiary hearing. First witness is Detective O’Driscoll

Discussing the interaction between Kouri and Det. O'Driscoll on April 14th, 2023. O'Driscoll went to the house that day to meet her. He was recording with an audio recording and then also later activated his body camera, after being invited into the home & asked to sit down.


The body camera has a red light, beeps and vibrates, and was in a view where Kouri would have been able to see it. Kouri is actively taking notes during O'Driscoll's current testimony.


During that meeting, Kouri, her mother Lisa Darden, O'Driscoll and Sergeant Hoffmeyer were all present. Kouri seemed happy to talk, was cheerful and outgoing.


A few days after, Kouri sent emails to O'Driscoll and Hoffmeyer, providing follow up to the previous conversation. Nothing further from Prosecutor Bloodworth. Defense atty Nester up for cross. O'Driscoll says he was at the home for a total of 3 hours the day of the meeting.


Re: Search warrant affidavit filed by O'Driscoll. O'Driscoll says the most important fact they knew was Eric died of fentanyl. His opinion was 3 different ways it could have happened: Accidental overdose, Su*c*de or, homicide. He was trying to investigate all.

The affidavit was filed the day before he met Kouri for the 3 hour interview. At the house there was mentions of ties within the community via soccer coaching. Potentially with O'Driscolls wife and Kouri.After Kouri invited them into her home, he did not mirandize her.

When asked if he knew Kouri had an attorney, he said he did not. Page 7 of transcript- Kouri mentions minutes into meeting that she had an attorney. Atty Nester seems to be trying to hone in on the fact that she should have been mirandized and informed of her rights

Prosecutor Bloodworth arguing the 6th amendment is not valid here and brings up jury pool and how false info being released, can impact jury pool. Kouri talking with her attorney, and seemed to be rolling her eyes a bit.

Proceedings being closed to public and media briefly while they work out something in the courtroom between attorneys.
 
@HiddenTrueCrime


Mr. Benson says anyone who has been in the house, has been personally escorted by him. He says no one has ever placed anything into the home or taken anything from the home other than what was taken during search warrants. Cross with Attorney Nester begins...

Clarified on the stand that the guardians of the children, prior to them going with family, went to the house once to collect things for the children but they were escorted by Mr. Benson.

 
@HiddenTrueCrime


While she was away from jail, there was indication that there was possible issue where she held up a piece of paper on a video call. They searched a second time and nothing was taken. The next day, there was another search of her cell. Videos of search being played.



6:11 PM · Jan 23, 2025
 
@HiddenTrueCrime


Kouri did not share the cell with anyone. She was going to be moving cells from upstairs to downstairs. The sergeant can be seen going through pages found in a yellow envelope. He says there were 100's of pages. After the search, he put the papers back in the envelope.

During this search and movement of items to another cell, Sergeant Barrett says nothing was seized by him. Mr. Bloodworth is up next to question Sgt. Barrett on the stand. He claims in this search he did not see the "Walk the Dog" letter.

NEXT WITNESS: Sergeant Thomas who is the administrative sergeant of the jail. He was also involved in the cell searches. He confirms he was involved in the search on the 14th. He was attempting to locate the letter held up on the video call. Says letter was never found/seized.
 
@HiddenTrueCrime


There was a total of 9 pages he confiscated, 6 of them which were the "Walk the Dog" letter.


Sgt. Thomas said in the Walk the Dog letter, Kouri was telling her brother what to say. Defense Attorney Lewis responded "That's your interpretation”


Both Thomas and Barrett have said during their testimonies that while Skye Lazaro’s name was on envelope, it was not labeled “privileged”

After seizing the letter, Thomas took it to the jail commander and then took it to the state attorneys.
 
Last edited:
@HiddenTrueCrime


Sergeant Thomas confirms he found the letter in the LSAT book and never searched an envelope with Lazaro on it. Sergeant Barrett was searching the envelope about 6.5 feet away from where Sergeant Thomas was.

The State is recalling Detective O'Driscoll to the stand
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
187
Guests online
550
Total visitors
737

Forum statistics

Threads
625,600
Messages
18,506,852
Members
240,821
Latest member
MMurphy
Back
Top