ethereal*22
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2019
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 1,630
Clears that up...moving right along... gracias...
Affidavit of Probable Cause
Investigations of Mackenzie's phone records show that her last communications were with Ayoola Adisa Ajayi.
Probably cause statement for arrest of Ayoola Ajayi | Dna Profiling | Forensic Science
Under state law found at Utah Code § 76-5-301, a person can be charged with kidnapping for:
“Detaining” means keeping someone in a location against their will. “Restraining” means interfering with the person’s ability to move freely.
- Detaining or restraining a person against their will:
- For a “substantial” amount of time.
- For any amount of time, if there is a risk the victim will be seriously injured.
Kidnapping charges become aggravated when the defendant commits kidnapping and additional elements are present – for example, using a weapon or acting with intent to commit a sex crime (e.g. rape, aggravated sexual assault).
Utah Kidnapping (Code 76-5-301) Defense Attorneys
She really is.Honestly, thank you. You are all awesomeness, wrapped in wonderful.
^bbm^sbm^
Both weapon and tracker can be helpful but do not necessarily prevent injury or death.
Re "(mini) weapon" --- need to train w it and be able to use effectively, to reduce chances of it being taken from victim and used against vic.
Re "tracker device"--- does this prevent injury/death? Or only help LE - after the fact - to follow movement, to locate and ID attacker? Also, perp can grab device itself, can discard anywhere, leading LE far from actual location of vic, whether injured or deceased.
JMO. Sorry, a bit O/T. Any more detailed discussion on ^is probably best addressed in elsewhere (downstairs/private forums?). Ready to veer back on track.
Lol, thank you!Honestly, thank you. You are all awesomeness, wrapped in wonderful.
You are welcome!Again, much thanks for clarification. This has been an issue for me! I had never seen any confirmation of communication after 6 pm- only that their respective phones both pinged near Hatch @ 3 am- then Kenzie’s stopped sending any signals whatsoever at approximately that same time- which placed him where she was when she essentially disappeared. And I assumed at that hour no other pings there but the two of them, viola-prime suspect- enough to get his phone records or whatever to move forward with him- and so it began- if there wasn’t already something that had tipped them off to him- and this was the smoking gun they needed-
I wonder if the fact he’s been lawyer hopping is part of why the attorneys haven’t filed tons of motions to get him out. His replacement for Ms. Gustin was hired only a few days ago.
Fox National News had a segment a little while ago about ML. The Legal person said the length of time AA has been kept in jail without further court time is very unusual. Said he would be filing all sorts of documents to get AA out. Only excuse he said is if Defense and AA agrees with the unusual lengthy incarceration.
Somehow, I missed hearing about Ms Gustin being replaced. (She’s the one with the spectacular resume of getting ‘alleged’ rapists off, right?)
Who was her replacement?
He has a new lawyer already?Somehow, I missed hearing about Ms Gustin being replaced. (She’s the one with the spectacular resume of getting ‘alleged’ rapists off, right?)
Who was her replacement?
thanks - I added it to the media thread- it may be a re-post but I didn't see it after a quick review around the 28th of June.I think this is the best summary of the case I've seen so far:
New information released in murder, kidnapping of University of Utah student; digital clues lead to suspect's capture | Gephardt Daily
It specifically states it was phone records (ML's) that led to AA, not an app. Discusses the tissue (charred) found in the area where her personal items were burned. Gives the date of her missed exam (the 20th). Tells the low low price of his AirBnB ($27/night).
It goes to explore the kinds of things you all have been sleuthing here (his LinkedIn, pompous bios, etc).
Anyway, for those of you trying to catch up, it's a good read.
An interesting statement in the probable cause I just reread . I know we knew this but the second part of this sentence could be termed conflicting to “phone record texting”.
“AA denied knowing what ML looked like and denied having seen a photo or online profile of ML, despite investigations that the means of which he communicated with her displayed a several photos of her and a profile photo.” (Yes there is a problem with that sentence—- the a/several are conflicting as well but are on the statement.. emphasis mine)
So this says to me that they communicated through some app or profile with pics— likely her seeking arrangement profile, beachbaby96. Would be interesting if that is the last communication the LE are referring to.
Now stepping aside and playing defense Atty-Is it possible or believable that he truly didn’t know her name? Maybe he only knew her as beachbaby?
BBM
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.