renatae
New Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2013
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction score
- 0
I'm confused can u clarify? Did she get less time on the fraud?
Sorry, if she said what the deal was, I missed it. I think they just moved right along.
I'm confused can u clarify? Did she get less time on the fraud?
OMG I can't believe that prosecution faux pas on the basic rules of evidence regarding hearsay!!!!
I've never seen such an embarrassing display of "um...." (exception to hearsay? what's that? Um...) Evidence 101, every WRITING must overcome a hearsay objection!
You may have noticed that in this trial ...the hearsay rules are often disregarded, particularly by the defense. But these prior statements being used to impeach the witness are permissible, despite the general hearsay rule.
Oh and I did read on one of the links provided today that Marty and Gypsy were passing letter thru a 3rd party while incarcerated. Sorry but I cant provide a link as to where I read it.
yes, they are admissible but it's absolutely unacceptable that the prosecution can't think fast enough on their feet to come up with a hearsay exception when trying to introduce documents into evidence.
They really should have been prepared for that.
LOL Don't go there. Vacations here are not fun. Trust me:blushing:
A little????
Mr. MacNeill's respirations are quite increased...