Ina Cognito
Lurking the web since 1995
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2013
- Messages
- 358
- Reaction score
- 1
In regard to the many suggestions of influence in this case, we all know it has probably happened however, it doesn't change the toxicology, the autopsy, the doctor statements, Martin's statements, Martin's discusting actions etc. To me it's typical in such a case to have the defense holler and claim "taint" as well as claim that one person convienced others, that's typical and expected. In this circumstancial case it's probably going to come down to whom the jury believes.... the girls and the prosecution? Or Martin MacNeill (the mormon who cheated on his wife twice, moved his mistress into the house a very short time after the death of his wife, whos mistress attended his wife's funeral and so on) There is no smoking gun so it will be a matter of believeability and what makes sense. The large problem here is the autopsy and causes of death.... I hope the state is on their toes for the ME and can knit this together for the jury.