VA - Amy Bradley, 23, Petersburg, 24 March 1998 - #2 - ***READ FIRST POST***

[neesaki]

How do we know Amy had no shoes on?

From the witnesses (the two girls and the woman in the bar who saw Y bring her a drink?).

(Because I thought Ivy said she brought at least 10 pairs so she did not know what if anything was missing).

She may have changed her shoes? They said she also "picked up" a pair of jeans whatever that means. In fact I am not sure that we know that she did not pick up two shirts two pairs of shoes two shirts etc. I mean probably not but how do we know? They don't seem to know exactly what she brought with her which is normal of course.

This is pretty important vis a vis the Venezuela sighting which is rejected by the family because the driver didn't mention no shoes.

Sorry just read back over today's posts and someone asked basically the same question, thanks.

I totally agree on the shoes. Ten pair of shoes is a lot to take on a cruise, makes me feel a whole lot better, LOL. The thing is, with as many shoes as Amy obviously had, how does anyone know what she had or didn't have on the cruise, or even the shoes that she actually owns and has at home, for that matter.
My point is, that without proof of someone seeing Amy shoeless, which as far as I know they did not, I don't see how her being barefoot is even a totally valid assumption. Not to mention, as someone posted previously, the taxi driver may not have even noticed shoes vs. no shoes. jmo

 

[dotr]

Everyone, for the record! I am sorry that I said waiter had tattoo without providing link, I just cannot find it and therefore must have misunderstood something seen or heard here or elsewhere. Still, the f.b.thingy is really odd, given the circumstances- seems almost taunting..

 

[neesaki]

Everyone, for the record! I am sorry that I said waiter had tattoo without providing link, I just cannot find it and therefore must have misunderstood something seen or heard here or elsewhere. Still, the f.b.thingy is really odd, given the circumstances- seems almost taunting..

OMG, that's exactly what I was thinking. Taunting.... really gives me the creeps.... As much as this case has been keeping me awake at night anyway, now I'll probably have nightmares about it too. :ghost:

 

[dotr]

Repost, cause it is handy..
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQ_OZ93qPHM&feature=related"]Amy Bradley Vanished Pt.1 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Jersey*Girl]

I know I've probably missed something, but would so appreciate if you could enlighten me, LOL ? TIA

Lol no us didn't.

Need nicknames & her interests (besides bsktball) to figure out user ids.

 

[neesaki]

Lol no us didn't.

Need nicknames & her interests (besides bsktball) to figure out user ids.

Maybe contact the Bradley's via that email address - [email protected]

 

[Sillybilly]

...and, there were other crew members who spent time with Amy, as well...Katalin (from Hungary); Eduardo Cabrito (a waiter); David Cato (a waiter); and, Patrick (a waiter)."

<rsbm>

I'm rummaging on some interesting things in the background here, so if anyone has a last name for Katalin, or any more info on her at all, I would greatly appreciate it !!!

 

[Sillybilly]

I can't watch vids because my internet costs me a fortune, but found this adult site with the same wording for AZ that is used in his " ... 30 years in the hospitality ....":

nice--videos.adultxxxmature.com/Adult//Mature/en/?cat=63 <put the http:// before the word nice>

Also, the alexis club is on twitter with followers/following Lexxy and leading to a bunch of the Zs (not Zaglanitis) ... tanya > kostas > eleni > george

 

[chicagofa13]

The shoes for me have become almost a nonissue. There is no way of knowing if she walked out of the room without because they weren't sure how many pairs. If you are the kidnapper/trafficker it takes 2 seconds to put flipflops on someone barefoot and now they have shoes. There are cheap shoes in outdoor markets all over and in regular stores. I mean no disrespect to FA or Amy's family but the shoes for me are just something that makes me lose focus more than anything. I don't know how your can prove/disprove a possible sighting based on shoes alone. Moo of course.

 

[chicagofa13]

I can't watch vids because my internet costs me a fortune, but found this adult site with the same wording for AZ that is used in his " ... 30 years in the hospitality ....":

nice--videos.adultxxxmature.com/Adult//Mature/en/?cat=63 <put the http:// before the word nice>

Also, the alexis club is on twitter with followers/following Lexxy and leading to a bunch of the Zs (not Zaglanitis) ... tanya > kostas > eleni > george

Someone else on here was also doing some tracking on lexxy. My search is not working right for some reason but it was in this thread #2.

 

[chicagofa13]

Are you wondering where Puerto Rico comes in and why the Puerto Rican Office is in charge of the investigation? If so, me too. :waitasec:

PR is the closest part of the US to the scene (whatever island that might be) and the FBI field office for the Caribbean.

This is a good link that shows their jurisdiction.

http://www.fbi.gov/sanjuan/contact-us/territory-jurisdiction

 

[~n/t~]

I'm not on FB anymore. Are you saying you can't find him at all? TIA

I found him. The TAZ profile pic is no longer his profile pic though.

 

[~n/t~]

The shoes for me have become almost a nonissue. There is no way of knowing if she walked out of the room without because they weren't sure how many pairs. If you are the kidnapper/trafficker it takes 2 seconds to put flipflops on someone barefoot and now they have shoes. There are cheap shoes in outdoor markets all over and in regular stores. I mean no disrespect to FA or Amy's family but the shoes for me are just something that makes me lose focus more than anything. I don't know how your can prove/disprove a possible sighting based on shoes alone. Moo of course.

I think it would've been of importance back then whether or not she had shoes on. If for example someone had found her shoes at a specific location, it could have been a lead or clue. But if we're looking for Amy today, I don't know if the shoes are relevant after all these years.

I still think the focus should be on her facial features and I wish they would do a coloured age progression photo of Amy. I'd like to see one made up with and without the wild hair and in colour.

 

[chicagofa13]

I think it would've been of importance back then whether or not she had shoes on. If for example someone had found her shoes at a specific location, it could have been a lead or clue. But if we're looking for Amy today, I don't know if the shoes are relevant after all these years.

I still think the focus should be on her facial features and I wish they would do a coloured age progression photo of Amy. I'd like to see one made up with and without the wild hair and in colour.

Yes, ITA. At this point in time the shoes are a nonissue to me. Sorry I wasn't more clear. Thanks!

 

[Teche]

I, too, believe that an age progression sketch is vital to helping us to find Amy. Is there a reason for not having an update? Is it the FBI/lE the only group that can authorize this?

 

[Teche]

I found him. The TAZ profile pic is no longer his profile pic though.

He obviously visits the forum. Why would he still be interested in our quest???

 

[EXIA15145]

A member posted an exact replica of the bed rail a few weeks ago. I'll see if I can find it.

If you refer to the bed posted in #745, it isn't even close. It might be similar, but it is far from 'an exact replica'. Sorry.

Maybe it was made by the same manufacturer, and maybe it wasn't. There's a lot of beds out there, but I've been looking on adult web sites. I've seen a couple that I thought looked close until I did the side by side, so I haven't posted any.

I doubt that bed's a one of a kind.

 

[EXIA15145]

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/17/travel/cruise-passenger-overboard/index.html

I don't know what to think of this, but I thought you'd all want to take a look. It's another Royal Caribbean ship. The girl that allegedly went over was
21 years old.

 

[masootz]

i posted this a day or two ago, but i see a lot of chatter about when searches were done on the ship. the article below indicates there were fbi searches of the ship prior to it landing in puerto rico -

the link below is an article from march 27, 1998 from the free-lance star (picked up from the AP wire). it describes the ship as nearing its trip and describes federal agents as having been on the ship, sea searches being done, etc. it provides some context (at least to me) for why the family may have left the ship.

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id...-bradley&hl=en

 

[Dushi]

Were there any passengers who disembarked in Curacuo who did not get back on board and leave with the ship other than the Bradleys?