- Joined
- Jan 12, 2016
- Messages
- 16,637
- Reaction score
- 163,197
Two peas in a pod. Two blocks of ice.
My sincere wish is that the judge throws out the plea agreement with nanny. And goes with 30 years.
Two peas in a pod. Two blocks of ice.
BB & John Carroll were a defense disaster.I am unconvinced him doing this was wise but I am hoping for a conviction, so, am glad he did. He always wants to show how he is the smartest, has an answer for everything, etc., that kind of arrogance seems consistent to me with someone who would devise this and think he’d get away with it. Thinking of Christine, V and Joe, it’s just sickening. Again, I think there is an element of a thrill kill for him, even now he has an odd affect on the stand like he is performing and he keeps glancing at the jury to see how it is landing. I am glad that local LE seemed to clock him as suspicious very quickly. And that Joe’s family and friends came forward with information the day of. May the victims get justice. Jmooo.
If the CW wants/needs JM they can call her again to testify to rebut anything from BB's testimony.My sincere wish is that the judge throws out the plea agreement with nanny. And goes with 30 years.
He almost appeared to be enjoying “showing off” on the stand, he pulled hot girl, he has friends who throw him parties in NY, people bring him presents, he’s moving up at work, etc.,…excited and being on trial for this is a very strange juxtaposition. I saw it too. Jmooo.BB & John Carroll were a defense disaster.
"Thrill" is an interesting concept because when BB was remembering and telling the jury how it all began with the sexual relationship with JM his facial expressions looked like he was reliving it and still found it exciting.
The thought of ever telling JM no obviously never crossed his mind.
Carroll brought out the worst in BB which showed the jury why the CW has charged him with the murders of CB & JR.
imo
Married men in their 40s with children do not have male friends who arrange birthday parties for them. Out of town male friends at that! And with his child in tow. This is pure fiction. lolI’m inclined to think the reason he mentioned his birthday is because he wanted people to know that he actually had friends. And going further in saying that his friends were having a party for him. He is so well respected by his friends that they are doing something nice for him. What a super guy I am![]()
Curious if just who these "friends" are is a question the detectives had asked him?Married men in their 40s with children do not have male friends who arrange birthday parties for them. Out of town male friends at that! And with his child in tow. This is pure fiction. lol
This part of the testimony is so damning. Most innocent people would answer with a simple NO.I wonder how the jury reacted to this part of his court testimony yesterday? The words, tone and body language are striking, jmoo.
Yes, I'm almost inclined to think they saved parts of her testimony for rebuttal, after they've got him on the record.If the CW wants/needs JM they can call her again to testify to rebut anything from BB's testimony.
If she refuses to testify or won't answer questions or is caught lying I believe the plea deal could be off.
She can't plead the 5th.either.