BBM
Do you have a link the baby wasn't taken to the Dr? TIA
This is a sore subject for me. Reading statements like yours about the respiratory issues feels like someone is pushing on a bruise. {respectfully snipped for brevity}
Colds can evolve in the matter of two days. I have seen it.
Anyways, I know your post was written with good intentions but I hope you are able to entertain the possibility that respiratory issues is a vague term and they can come on quickly. That's all.
As far as I know, we don't have anything from LE, hearings, or MSM stating that they failed to take her to a doctor.
I, too, have a lot of experience with my own children having fast developing respiratory issues. One had RSV twice as an infant and the other was diagnosed with a respiratory condition after I took her to Dr after Dr for months. From the day she was born, I knew something was wrong but I was told over and over she was just fine. I stopped taking her for a few weeks as it got to the point that I was being made to feel like I was over thinking it, I was crazy for bringing her in so frequently for "nothing". Then it got *really bad* *really fast*. I thank God I got in with a Ped who really listened to HER, heard what was happening, immediately gathered a team and went to work on her.
I have thought a lot about that aspect of this case. We don't actually know the severity of nature of her condition b/c different MSM's have attributed Fleenor as saying "significant" or "severe" and "problems" or "infection". I think it was brought up in her bond hearing as one of several factors in the CA's case for against AW and PT.
If they HAD taken her to a doctor for that condition, I would assume one defense attorney or the other would have brought that up.
But this was a bond hearing and I think they will have ample time to bring that up if/when custody of Baby A ever comes to court or during a trial on these charges. (If they charges end up being escalated, it might end up as a moot point).
And the charges against both parents are NOT "medical neglect" charges. That is a different charge under the Virginia code.
(Yes, I know...I am rambling). All of that is to say that while I do think that her respiratory condition was obviously a cause for concern by CPS, and at least one part of the evidence for the CA's charges against the parents, I think it bears pointing out that it was not the only basis for the neglect charges (as we now know they left her unattended as well).
It will be interesting to see how that piece unfolds. The respiratory condition could have come on suddenly, or it could have even been caused by something like exposure to second hand smoke. A parent who took their child to the doctor would most certainly be viewed more favorably than one who didn't - but since the state chose not to file medical neglect charges, I don't think this can be chalked up to more than a contributing factor for their charges UNLESS they do find it was due to conditions created by the parents.
Edited to add: It will be interesting if anyone who saw them that weekend (Fri or Sat) before this all happened ends up testifying for one side or the other as to Baby A's condition.