VERDICT WATCH - Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Break 2/27 thru 3/2 #2

[Colie]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v-DLP_-bF10&feature=youtu.be

29 min interview with BK and Jen from Trial Diaries




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It was nice to see the teamwork

 

[krkrjx]

The Innocence Project wouldn't touch her with a ten-foot pole. It was her DNA and she confessed. No false confession there. And any reputable DV group would be wise to stay away from her, it will backfire.
She's NEVER gonna be released, even if Arizona did away with the Death Penalty. She's like Charles Manson. He goes up for parole, sentence was commuted when CA did away with the Death Penalty for awhile in the '70's- he will NEVER get parole, too dangerous!!!

Innocence Project helps those incarcerated who are innocent. So obviously they would not be interested in Killer Arias.

There are a bunch of advocacy groups, though. One with a DV interest could get involved on this monster's behalf. A group on the up and up wouldn't, but one that is looking for publicity or some other gain might at least toy with the idea of taking up her cause.

It's a strange, strange world we live in.

 

[Colie]

Here is your exact post ""Doesn't look like the verdict will be for awhile. Like Paul said last night on the crime true radio show. ""

Like I said, Paul's guess is just everyone else's, a guess.

Nope Here is the post Colie's Avatar Colie Colie is online now
Registered User
Join Date
Oct 2014
Posts
124
This is Jarrett, Beth Karas and Jen Wood doing an observation of the trial so far. Doesn't look like the verdict will be for awhile. Like Paul said last night on the crime true radio show.

This is why I don't post here! Here is the original:
This is Jarrett, Beth Karas and Jen Wood doing an observation of the trial so far. Doesn't look like the verdict will be for awhile. Like Paul said last night on the crime true radio show.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-DLP_-bF10
Justice for Travis

 

[NashBridges2]

@juanstie: @adeleatplay @TrialDiariesJ @StabbysPencil @audrey_m It has been extended http://t.co/F4DDuLTxWy

MIT spec contract extended til 2018


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Wow. Can't believe they decided to keep paying her to do nothing but tweet and gossip.

 

[krkrjx]

Nope Here is the post Colie's Avatar Colie Colie is online now
Registered User
Join Date
Oct 2014
Posts
124
This is Jarrett, Beth Karas and Jen Wood doing an observation of the trial so far. Doesn't look like the verdict will be for awhile. Like Paul said last night on the crime true radio show.

This is why I don't post here! Here is the original:
This is Jarrett, Beth Karas and Jen Wood doing an observation of the trial so far. Doesn't look like the verdict will be for awhile. Like Paul said last night on the crime true radio show.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-DLP_-bF10
Justice for Travis

"Doesn't look like the verdict will be for awhile" means what, exactly?

And what is it that makes it look (or not look?) that way?

 

[Colie]

Not Monday and might be weeks. 15 days for the Devault case.

 

[TexMex]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v-DLP_-bF10&feature=youtu.be

29 min interview with BK and Jen from Trial Diaries




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They feel a death verdict is very likely.

 

[NashBridges2]

"Doesn't look like the verdict will be for awhile" means what, exactly?

And what is it that makes it look (or not look?) that way?

Ok so it's not just me? LOL.

 

[NashBridges2]

Not Monday and might be weeks. 15 days for the Devault case.

15 days to do what?

 

[krkrjx]

Not Monday and might be weeks. 15 days for the Devault case.

OK...I just don't get that 15 days claim.

All articles I have read said it took THREE DAYS of deliberation to arrive at the verdict for DeVault.

I realize Paul was there but how can there be such a discrepancy on the time?

ETA: Looks like some articles say more than three days; I have found none that says it took 15 days over 5 weeks to decide. Now, the whole penalty phase may have taken 5 weeks, so maybe that's what Paul is referring to. Still....that has no bearing on how long Arias jury can be expected to deliberate.

SECOND ETA: Actually, I don't care how long they deliberated, LOL. They are two totally different cases and he knows how long this jury will deliberate about the same as we do. He's guessing, too.

 

[NashBridges2]

Am I in the fog?

 

[smeck]

Not Monday and might be weeks. 15 days for the Devault case.

If I understood the previous posts, it was stated that they only deliberated for 3 days....you might want to verify.

 

[NashBridges2]

OK...I just don't get that 15 days claim.

All articles I have read said it took THREE DAYS of deliberation to arrive at the verdict for DeVault.

I realize Paul was there but how can there be such a discrepancy on the time?

Paul, exaggerating again. From what I understand, the whole guilt/sentance/DP took 15 days total, over a 5 week period. Someone correct me if I'm wrong....

 

[Colie]

Really 15 days before the verdict by the jury.

How long do you think?

 

[dog.gone.cute]

From previous thread:
It's really important for the appeal if there's a death sentence. The defense will have to say on appeal, "Jodi did not voluntarily give up her right to testify/allocute, and IF SHE HAD DONE SO SHE WOULD HAVE SAID __________, which reasonably could have made a difference to the verdict because _________, so this Court should vacate the death sentence." If you just say the first part and the last part, you lose. If you say the middle part with nothing in the trial court record to support it, you lose. So you have to get the proposed testimony on the record, either by having the witness testify outside the presence of the jury "for the record," or having the attorney describe the proposed testimony outside the presence of the jury, or filing a written description of the proposed testimony.

It's possible, but I think JSS would find it too risky as Boytwnmom said to leave things sitting for a 3-day weekend.

Jurors could be struck by lightning or run over by llamas or something in that amount of time.

:hilarious: :hilarious: "run over by llamas" :floorlaugh:

Only in this case ... ya can't make this stuff up !

:cheers:

 

[NashBridges2]

Really 15 days before the verdict by the jury.

How long do you think?

They didn't deliberate for 15 days.

 

[Colie]

OK...I just don't get that 15 days claim.

All articles I have read said it took THREE DAYS of deliberation to arrive at the verdict for DeVault.

I realize Paul was there but how can there be such a discrepancy on the time?

What not understanding? Paul was a juror.

 

[smeck]

It's true...only 3 days of deliberation

 

[NashBridges2]

It's true...only 3 days of deliberation

Thank you.... I thought I was losing my mind (or drunk, or in a fog)

 

[smeck]

It was discussed in depth earlier tonight. Someone figured out that Paul was referring to something else....it was just a poorly structured sentence on his part.