I dont mean to be insensitive but if this was a homicide why are they even mentioning the self-inflicted cuts on her fingers? Who cares? What does that have to do with her being murdered?
All of this! Why bring up something so seemingly inconsequential to confuse the public even more? They already know every single detail about the condition of her body, and there's no way this was the only visible or reportable sign of trauma.
We are not in any danger, but there's now a list of ways we are supposed to be cautious and vigilant.
It's being investigated as a homicide, unless it's not.
She got to the culvert somehow. Either in her car, which was returned by whoever left her there, or in someone else's car, meaning an abduction on 58th. I suppose she could have walked there but the chances of that with no one seeing her & no surveillance seems highly unlikely.
Scenario 1: She was attacked and struck or cut at/in her car resulting in blood spatter on the passenger interior, injected or drugged to subdue her (waiting for tox reports), was placed in a 2nd vehicle - trunk? - and received self inflicted finger cuts trying to free herself from bindings or trunk. Putting it out there to prod suspect?
Scenario 2: No determinable or singular cause of death, waiting for tox screen and putting out the words "self-inflicted" and info about testing the car blood to see if it's Cheryl's to imply that it could be a potential suicide to calm public nerves as it's not what they may have initially suspected & have absolutely nothing.
I'm not seeing suicide... If they really thought that was a strong possibility there wouldn't have been such odd & covert media releases & repeated searches & pleas for info. LE has been asked repeatedly if there is public risk & they're waffling.
Really upsetting to think of what Cheryl must have gone through, regardless.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk