This post does not focus on Ms D, so much as potential shortcomings
(imo) in formation & operation of entities like Spokane police oversight committee she was appted to.
ETA: Found https://my.spokanecity.org/opendata/charter/article-16/ so am correcting commission name, per city charter: "Article XVI: Office of Police Ombudsman & Police Ombudsman Commission" eff date Feb 2013.
A city passes ordinance to form a police ombudsman commission; community wants limited background checks of applicants;
does not want to deter ppl who may have a 'misstep or two in their past;'
wants c
ommission to include people most likely to have contact with PD.
And
who would those ppl w PD contact be? Arrestees, detainees, convicted criminals?
If Ms D were
convicted of offenses re filing false reports w PD, is that cause to remove her from office? Seems not, imo, because, appointees are supposed to include ppl w contact w PD. Is a (hypo) conviction like this just a 'small misstep' like city spokesman referred to, below?
And what are
limited background checks? Include or not include
-
-Criminal background check? For Spokane only or previous residences?
-Obtaining transcripts from high schools, trade schools, colleges, universities?
-Verification of employment - current and past?
-Verifying professional references named on app?
-Verifying other info applicant reports on form?
Or does 'limited' or 'low-level' mean depending on 'honor system' in self reporting?
Without more specific info about Spokane commission, I can only speculate, but
(imo) Police Ombudsman Commission may be great in theory, not so much in RL. JM2cts, could be all wrong.
____________________________________________________________
Spokane City spokesman re 2014 events re new Police Oversight Comm
from
http://www.cdapress.com/news/local_news/article_385adfeb-76f3-5050-98b4-d4bf021c423f.html June 11
"...job descriptions were written and we began recruiting applicants," he said.
Spokane Mayor appointed her."
"Coddington said the selection committee was formed in May that year and a decision was made based on community input to do very limited background checks on the applicants.
"The community wanted diversity and limited background checks," Coddington said, explaining that the committee didn't want to deter applicants who may have had a misstep or two in their past. "The low level background checks were intentional."
"Dolezal's application ... was signed by Dolezal and submitted in May 2014...acquired through a public record request."
"On the application...to declare ethnicity. On Dolezal's...was white, African-American, Native American and two or more races.
While ethnicity was not a criterion for selection, Coddington said it was certainly taken into account.
"... city ordinance ...lists six characteristics given serious consideration in the appointment process. One of them is the individual's ability to "Contribute to the diversity of the commission so that the makeup of the commission reflects the diversity of the people most likely to have contact with members of the police department, including geographic, racial and disability diversity."
The Police Oversight Committee has a significant amount of power in Spokane city government,...."
"Coddington said if it is determined that a commissioner fabricated information on his or her application, the City Council has the authority to remove or appoint members to that committee." bbm
ETA: ^led to searches for wrong comm name, because spokesman or reporter used other term.