- Joined
- Sep 8, 2011
- Messages
- 3,087
- Reaction score
- 4,244
I read excerpts from the book yesterday off google books. Parents are Pentecostal. Brother wrote parents adopted children because they wanted to show support for prolife.
It sounds as though RD is not accountable for Howard's assumption that she is black, but did they vet her portfolio? Presumably she's accountable for the artwork she submitted? But did they check?
Quiver Full has no limits. More babies, more better. Raise them up to break their spirits. Adopt more for the Quiver.
This reminds me of the mindset of people with Munchausen Syndrome or Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. Desperate for attention they fabricate illnesses but many of them also fabricate rapes, assaults, hate crimes, they even committ arsons and blame it on others.
I think she has lied about ALL of it.
In a post about the Oscar-winning film 12 Years a Slave, she said it was “not the best film to take a white partner to on a first date”.
She advocates sitting in the back row of the cinema so that “if white people are inclined to stare, they have to turn all the way round to do it … so that during the movie people aren’t constantly looking at you to monitor the ‘black response’ to the film”.
I can only go by what has been reported.
"Dolezal attended college in Mississippi, then went on to Howard University on scholarship -- not having identified herself black then on her application, because there was no such option, though people there may have assumed as much "because her portfolio of art was all African-American portraiture," her mother said."
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/12/us/washington-spokane-naacp-rachel-dolezal-identity/
Could someone please clarify the following for me? My brain is not working.
Why did the parents come forward at this time? Was it the investigating journalist that did the research and called the parents for comment? And why was he investigating her? I can't remember how this all came to light. Thank you so much!
Otto- it wouldn't have mattered what trimester. Her parents didn't trust any "clinicians." Rachel's father delivered their children. No midwives allowed. Jesus was listed as their witness on the babies' birth certificate.
Rachel's mother told Joshua he was a survivor of the holocaust on babies since he was born after Roe v Wade, and according to Joshua, they adopted black babies to demonstrate their pro-life bona fides.
White folks cannot paint folks of another culture? Somebody better arrest Gaugin!
This conversation is ridiculous.
I can't paint black people or have curly hair or I am a poseur?
My daughter cannot straighten her hair or she is not authentic?
Eff people who tell you what you are "supposed" to be.
I had to Google "Quiver Full" to get an idea what this post is about.
I don't see how it relates to this case.
JMO.
I can't help but wonder if Rachel created this, too.It seems as though Pandora's box has been opened!
Until you deal with someone like this in your own circle I think it's hard to understand. Some people love being the victim. They tell their lies and I think some eventually believe what they've been lying about. Other times I think they know the truth but the lie gets so much more attention.Buzzfeed article explains that her many and extravagant claims of being victimized are what drew attention to her other stories.
BUT. Who was the source that "reached out" and sent photos and contact information of her family to the media? Folks along the way seem to have been suspicious about her racial claims, not certain. Photos are proof.
Rachel is 100% responsible for her own mess, but I still believe something is off about the family as a whole. They are estranged, have been for years, and rather bitterly. Which is why I don't accept brother Ezra's accusations at face value, nor her parents' statements which often, IMO, are jabs at Rachel.
A supportive or even neutral family would not have commented to the media about her. These folks haven't piped down yet.
She brought all of this on herself. All of it.But do they have to be so eager in exposing her even to the point of bringing out pictures? I'll admit I find that interesting.
Rachel's a liar. I want to see how she filled out that ap.I think it is more complicated than that. From what I understand, she never said to Howard University that she was black. What happened was that she applied to the school and sent photos of her paintings, which were all portraits of black subjects and she was accepted and given a scholarship. Supposedly, the school was surprised when they saw that she was a white girl, but she did not do anything illegal when she applied.
Joshua says his mother had to persuade his father to allow her to buy the Encyclopedia Briticanna so she could educate herself. He bought all the volumes, but they remained in their shrink wrap on the book shelves. Reading when chores could be done was impermissible enough that his father raged if he caught anyone so bold.
Her mother miscarried her first baby, at around age 18 or 19, one year or so after the teepee. She was at home, and bleeding profusely. She refused to go to a hospital or to allow anyone to come take care of her, saying she was prepared to die if that was God's will.
White folks cannot paint folks of another culture? Somebody better arrest Gaugin!
This conversation is ridiculous.
I can't paint black people or have curly hair or I am a poseur?
My daughter cannot straighten her hair or she is not authentic?
Eff people who tell you what you are "supposed" to be.
has it been mentioned that she sued Howard Uni in 2007 or 8?
Joshua says his mother had to persuade his father to allow her to buy the Encyclopedia Briticanna so she could educate herself. He bought all the volumes, but they remained in their shrink wrap on the book shelves. Reading when chores could be done was impermissible enough that his father raged if he caught anyone so bold.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.