me too.
[modsnip]
I do not know him. Just what people are telling me now. But, W's I had a front seat. Forgiveness....don't think so, I can't get past my own guilt. Let me add, J had TWO parents, so far all the focus has been on father.
me too.
[modsnip]
If it's true about Jenise's father spouting forgiveness in church, that freaks me out a bit. Isn't it a bit soon for that? We don't even really know what happened and why.
Forgiveness would not be possible to me. I am not religious at all. I would leave it up to the courts, but forgiveness would never factor into any of my feelings or responses. Neither would revenge, for that matter.
I do not know him. Just what people are telling me now. But, W's I had a front seat. Forgiveness....don't think so, I can't get past my own guilt. Let me add, J had TWO parents, so far all the focus has been on father.
Way too soon IMO. I think that's why I was so shocked.
I agree. I'm all for forgiveness when possible, but for something this heinous, it shocked me that her father could speak of it just one day after his daughter's killer and rapist was arrested, before he knows all the facts. For me it almost minimized what Jenise went through (especially remembering his initial interview). I keep trying to understand what his thought process could possibly be. But no matter how many noble motives I try to attach to this, it's not working for me. I wish he had waited.
I agree. I'm all for forgiveness when possible, but for something this heinous, it shocked me that her father could speak of it just one day after his daughter's killer and rapist was arrested, before he knows all the facts. For me it almost minimized what Jenise went through (especially remembering his initial interview). I keep trying to understand what his thought process could possibly be. But no matter how many noble motives I try to attach to this, it's not working for me. I wish he had waited.
I agree. I'm all for forgiveness when possible, but for something this heinous, it shocked me that her father could speak of it just one day after his daughter's killer and rapist was arrested, before he knows all the facts. For me it almost minimized what Jenise went through (especially remembering his initial interview). I keep trying to understand what his thought process could possibly be. But no matter how many noble motives I try to attach to this, it's not working for me. I wish he had waited.
Rest easy, from what I can read of Washington's law, he will be charged as an adult:
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=13.04.030
(v) The juvenile is sixteen or seventeen years old on the date the alleged offense is committed and the alleged offense is:
(A) A serious violent offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030;
(C) Robbery in the first degree, rape of a child in the first degree, or drive-by shooting, committed on or after July 1, 1997;
(I) In such a case the adult criminal court shall have exclusive original jurisdiction.
-----
I have no fear of him being charged as a juvenile.
IMO, the father rightfully has a heck of a lot of public, governmental, and I'm guessing familial heat on him right now. Notwithstanding this wonderful, really refreshing discussion of forgiveness, he is simply deflecting, IMO. He was accused of something heinous by some, he is accused of horrible neglect by others, he was convicted of something horrible that will follow him for the rest of his life and now everybody knows it, his best shot right now is to play gracious victim of someone who did worse than he.
But what if you are accused but innocent. How can the ins. co. assume one is guilty before the trial?
am totally with you.....this reaches ''olympic'' levels of forgiveness ..... am pretty sure I'd be either fetal position in a padded room or a raging granny
am always humbled by those who do so under horrific circumstances like this
I'm a bit confused though. Why would an insurance company that provides home and auto insurance to a client be required to pay a victim's family in a civil suit against the perp? IMO, the liability coverage that a policy holder has, for both home and auto, would have to be directly related to something negligent/careless(etc) the policy holder did in relation to their home or auto, that caused pain/injury/suffering/disability/death to the victim('s family)......eg) you drive drunk and kill someone, the victim's family can sue drunk driver in civil court........or you forget to unplug a space heater in your home and it starts your house on fire that then spreads to neighbor's home. What would rape and murder have to do with home/auto liability insurance? This makes no sense to me.
I see him as very low functioning or something. Not to be rude but something isn't clicking.
While I have forgiven my rapist and the circumstances around those years, I was 11 at the end of it. I am now almost 40, it took me damn near 15 years to get to forgiveness! It was not an over night occurrence, it was a process.
If someone raped my child tonight, Lord help me, but, I don't know if I could be forgiving in a matter of a week or two. At this point, my Mama bear may still be in effect to the point that I would want blood. Hell, I'll be honest, I might seek it myself!
Forgiveness, as others have said, is a process. It takes YEARS! NOT DAYS! MOO!
I'm a bit confused though. Why would an insurance company that provides home and auto insurance to a client be required to pay a victim's family in a civil suit against the perp? IMO, the liability coverage that a policy holder has, for both home and auto, would have to be directly related to something negligent/careless(etc) the policy holder did in relation to their home or auto, that caused pain/injury/suffering/disability/death to the victim('s family)......eg) you drive drunk and kill someone, the victim's family can sue drunk driver in civil court........or you forget to unplug a space heater in your home and it starts your house on fire that then spreads to neighbor's home. What would rape and murder have to do with home/auto liability insurance? This makes no sense to me.