That's interesting to me, as well. It provides more info on history.
http://www.wivb.com/dpp/news/local/Man-returns-from-WA-with-sons-ashes
Quote from article:
"Jay was forced to have a cross-country relationship with Azriel who moved away from WNY with his mom years ago."
Who knows the reason she left NY & her son's bio-dad & returned to the PNW? That was a big decision to make, knowing that Az wouldn't be able to see his dad very often, since they'd be living on opposite coasts.
Nevertheless, it demonstrates a history of leaving, despite the long-term consequences for her son & his relationship with his father.
The more info that emerges, the more a pattern in her history forms.
A history of involvement with partners who have had DV issues. This includes both her ex-boyfriend who was charged with assaulting Az (charges were eventually dropped because it couldn't be determined who had actually assaulted Az), and also RS (IIRC), who had a prior DV charge (according to earlier posts) against his ex (if that info is accurate).
A history of alcohol abuse. The 2005 DUI/hit & run conviction (where her blood alcohol level was 3 times over the legal limit).
A history of CPS investigations for various reasons, including neglect/lack of supervision of Az due to intoxication. The most recent CPS investigation being April 2009.
Now add the recent revelation that she was the one to leave JC & move back to the PNW, despite the fact that it would mean the boy & his father would not be able to have regular contact due to the geographic distance.
Here's what I wonder right now: Why was it so impossible for the court to determine who had assaulted Az? Why, during that CPS case, did she voluntarily send him to live with relatives (according to the media report)? Did she choose to stay with the boyfriend because she knew he was innocent of the charges (which would imply that she was the guilty one)? Did she choose to stay with the boyfriend even though she knew he had harmed her son, and instead, volunteered to send him to live with relatives? Either scenario is alarming, to say the least.
The more I learn about this woman's history, the more I feel she didn't have her son's best interests in mind.
IMO, she had her own interests in mind.
IMO, she was probably leaving again, and unfortunately, little Az has paid the price for her decisions, over & over again, and now - he's paid the ultimate price.