Tunnel vision.
I don't think that is the case at all. The facts are pointing to her being in the water, The shoe found was hers, identified by bf. Scent dogs didn't pick up any scent that she made it off the beach.
Tunnel vision.
http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2010/mar/23/investigators-following-leads-case-missing-silverd/
This news article is very interesting if only b/c of these things:
"Thurston County Sheriff's detectives are still 'following up leads' in an effort to find Shantina Smiley, but are not conducting any searches for the missing Silverdale woman."
"Detective Lt. Chris Mealy said Monday that investigators are working on several tips that have come into their office."
I highly doubt a murderer would turn them on either!
I don't know how LE is investigating this, although I DO hope they haven't dismissed out of hand that someone else could have been involved somehow. What I am saying is that once most heard the word "alcoholic", then all other possibilities ceased to exist. There is no other explanation for what happened that night, no other possible scenario, no other reason for her actions.
For example:
They found no foreign fingerprints in the car and the body of Azriel was claimed to be a drowning by the ME. If there was some kind of beating or vicious attack, the ME would know the difference between injuries before and after death.
Why would it have to be an attack or beating? It's been stated many times on these threads, the water was cold enough to kill very quickly. Open door, throw poor little guy into the water.
That's not true. I've called 911 to report a drunk relative that had called me from his cell phone while driving drunk. LE located the driver on a CA freeway, observed, stopped and arrested the driver for DUI. Even if only works some of the time, isn't a child's life worth the call? I've called on other drivers and been taken very seriously, but I didn't follow up to see if they'd been located/stopped.
That said, we have the benefit of 20/20 hindsight and knowledge of the events that followed.
If some random, intoxicated woman with a starving son knocked on my door at 10:00, I'm sure I would probably call the police
Yes..but they were drunk....there is no indication that they thought she was drunk ...just upset at being lost
as for the diner and the "fall"...they did not see her fall, they saw it on the security video after they were reported missing
she paid for the food there...and left early...no crime
she didn't appear drunk at the convenience store...women are allowed to buy a bottle of wine when they have a child with them
Actually I would not have even answered the door myself ...and I bet many here would not have
answered the door ...could be dangerous
Hindsight is great but easy to do IMHO
Has any of her family or friends been interviewed (by the media) other than her boyfriend and Aziel's father? If they have, I apologize, as I missed it. If they haven't been interviewed, why? I find that a little odd.
That's not true. I've called 911 to report a drunk relative that had called me from his cell phone while driving drunk. LE located the driver on a CA freeway, observed, stopped and arrested the driver for DUI. Even if only works some of the time, isn't a child's life worth the call? I've called on other drivers and been taken very seriously, but I didn't follow up to see if they'd been located/stopped.
That said, we have the benefit of 20/20 hindsight and knowledge of the events that followed.
Looking very closely, I can see track marks along the red lines, which would possibly indicate that she drove down the beach, turned to the left and ended up with the rear of the van pointing toward the water.
I'm not sure if all of the tire tracks are hers - maybe she was driving in circles...wouldn't surprise me.
I don't know what is in the photo or if it was there, but it doesn't show in the photo of the van on the beach alone.
![]()
I never said otherwise. I guess I'm not being clear. Not sure how else to explain...
I don't think that is the case at all. The facts are pointing to her being in the water, The shoe found was hers, identified by bf. Scent dogs didn't pick up any scent that she made it off the beach.
"Tunnel vision" as in there's no other possible scenario considered beyond "well, she's an alcoholic".
Her ex husband JS was interviewed. He is not Azriel's father, but AFAIK, he was charged @ some point with assaulting Az (choking him, breaking his arm). IIRC, the charges were dropped.
Yes..but they were drunk....there is no indication that they thought she was drunk ...just upset at being lost
as for the diner and the "fall"...they did not see her fall, they saw it on the security video after they were reported missing
she paid for the food there...and left early...no crime
she didn't appear drunk at the convenience store...women are allowed to buy a bottle of wine when they have a child with them
Actually I would not have even answered the door myself ...and I bet many here would not have
answered the door ...could be dangerous
Hindsight is great but easy to do IMHO
After reading this latest, I take it to mean that they aren't looking for a body.
They are following leads. What leads need to be followed up on to solve an accidental drowning case?
Also, I read somewhere a post that she turned around on the beach, but I looked for 30 minutes at those tracks and couldn't see where she turned around, so she must have backed down to the spot. Pulling forward and backward from that spot in a tight circle does not get you turned around facing a different direction. I think she was spinning her tires as she went, and that is what spattered the wet sand on the windshield. I agree, there is no way LE or the tow truck driver would have entered the car at all except to put it in neutral and disengage the emergency brake if it had been set.
I thought a lot about this today at work. The Williams family never said they smell alcohol on her. If she drank from the jug or poured into a bottle, she would more than likely have spilled some that would have made her smell of it even more. I just keep having the sense that she never drank this wine. I don't why. I keep getting the impression she was wanting to give the impression both in her "relapse" ( under what circumstances this took place we aren't privy to ), and on the trip that she was drunk, erratic and lost. I do not see evidence of this as on a Saturday night at some point she had to have passed a cop. So other than driving hither to and yon she must have not been weaving as no one 911 a drunk driver.
Lastly, I dont get how she wouldn't have told the grandfather she was not coming until the next day. When she KNEW she intended to drive down the road she was on before back past the Mercantile and and onto the beach. How did she know she was close to a beach? Going once to the Mercantile is one thing, going past it again tells me she already had it in mind as a destination. Why? Zangle Rd is obviously a side road. And the other one looked more promising to be near a beach, as this looked like it was going farther inland. She knew where she was going all along.
I don't believe he is the one who assaulted Azriel. This was discussed on the last thread.