WA WA - Sky Metalwala, 2, Bellevue, 6 Nov 2011 - # 7

[Cubby]

Um, I just reread the info from that 'dating' website. Did anyone besides me take it to read she is looking for that as a, uh, salary range.

I am looking for a REAL man. YOU tell me YOUR 'ideal' arrangement!" The profile says "JB" expects "US$3,001 - $5,000 monthly."

 

[momtective]

Sugar daddy-F? I hope that stands for Female and not what initially crossed my mind. I think I am gonna uke: (I am literaly nauseous)

And to think, again, naively, I sat her thinking at least neither of these parents have brought a significant other into the picture.

I wonder if this expands the theory into the step dad/boyfriend area.

These poor babies and poor daddy.

http://www.seekingarrangement.com/detail.php?id=661549

 

[MizStery]

Police in Sky Metalwala search obtained info from dating website

http://www.king5.com/news/local/Pol...ained-info-from-dating-website-133842203.html

I am on record and off the fence. JB is a card carrying

Goldigger

Arrest her....grab her by her blond roots and force her to led us to Sky.

Just evil...this goes beyond evil

 

[SurfieTX]

Factor in the last time Sky was seen, which is reportedly October 23, 2011.

LE definitely has not been sitting on their hands, that's for sure.

 

[MaryAnn]

Um, I just reread the info from that 'dating' website. Did anyone besides me take it to read she is looking for that as a, uh, salary range.

I am looking for a REAL man. YOU tell me YOUR 'ideal' arrangement!" The profile says "JB" expects "US$3,001 - $5,000 monthly."

She is a "Piece of Work". Sugar Baby, give me a break!!! Doubt anyone would put up with her cleaning fettish.

 

[Rougelatete]

I haven't had a chance until now to peruse the flickr account in more detail but....holy cow. Those photos are super-staged. This lends itself to more evidence of PD. These are calculated moves made by JB. I'm surprised no clinicians called her out on this. If I had a client who brought in these photos -- "look! see? I feed my kids! All the time! It's the main thing I do with them!" I would really question them about what's going on here that there's such a need to prove it, to provide documentation.

I've counted and, in some of the albums, more than 50% of the photos are of children (usually M.) eating, eating, eating....making food....and then eating some more. Don't children do other stuff that's cute as well? Why is eating so noteworthy? It's overboard. They're drinking in the bathtub! They're building a kitchen! They eat in multiple locations! Their car seats are clean as a whistle but they eat, eat, eat in the car!

What is going on here?!

 

[SurfieTX]

From the website. Is this the picture with Sky but cropped?

 

[Cubby]

Whoops, I see I misread Sugar Baby as Sugar Daddy. Goes to show how much that shocked me based on what we learnt about her 'Christian Values'. You know I wondered why there was no pleas from anyone they went to church with.

Wow, still picking my jaw up off the floor.

I guess I must be a rarity. My son just turned 9 and I won't consider dating until he is off to college. I WANT to be a selfish parent by not taking time away from my children and focusing it on someone else. There will be plenty of time for that later....

Wow, just wow. And she posts pictures publicly of her baby girl topless for all the sicko's to get off on? I'm sick.

 

[Adrienne37]

From the website. Is this the picture with Sky but cropped?

Yes indeed it is.

 

[Adrienne37]

Did you happen to browse through the other photos on the site that she posted of herself?

 

[Pugnolia]

Police in Sky Metalwala search obtained info from dating website

http://www.king5.com/news/local/Pol...ained-info-from-dating-website-133842203.html

Holy **** ! Me thinks this story is going to reveal some interesting new theories.

 

[~n/t~]

From the site:


Sugar Daddy: The modern sugar daddy is a successful and generous man who is willing to pamper and offer financial help or gifts to a young person in return for friendship and companionship.

http://www.seekingarrangement.com/arrangement.php

I'm guessing there were only 3 options

Sugar Daddy: The modern sugar daddy is a successful and generous man who is willing to pamper and offer financial help or gifts to a young person in return for friendship and companionship.

Sugar Mommy: The modern sugar mommy or sugar momma is a successful and generous woman who is willing to pamper and offer financial help or gifts to a young person in return for friendship and companionship.

Sugar Baby:
A sugar baby is an attractive, ambitious and goal oriented individual who has a lot to offer. He or she is generally younger and is looking to meet wealthy, successful and generous people who are willing to pamper and offer financial assistance or gifts in return for their friendship or companionship


Sounds like she was looking for an older gentleman who was financially stable. That's how I interpreted it.

Not a dating site I'd use but others are just as bad. :innocent:

 

[gitana1]

This is from the exchange from hell:
When I am reading a retelling of an event I usually think there has to be a
kernel of truth and the person could be fabricating around that. My son around the same age as M said a man who he would come into contact with was "mean" to him. I never was able to piece together why my three & half year old said that. (but i made darn sure that there was never a chance he would be alone with him again) I am not disputing M was coached but the
statement in that recording where M claimed Armard was mean to her does worry me. Now,I know your going to say M was coached but I wonder if that raised a doubt to the state.

Julia: “And she also says Armand is very, very mean to her, you know. He
hurts her and that’s probably not the best thing for a little girl like M.”

Not to put too fine of a point on this but I wonder if that could have weighed in the courts
decision. I am thinking there had to be something that raised a red flag to the court and they gave her custody.
MOO
Do we know who Armand is? Is this a child or a man?

Maybe there is a kernel of truth. Like, he came home from work and found that yet again, Julia had forced Sky to remain in bed all day while she cleaned, not taking care of his needs, leaving him in a soiled diaper and shrieking with hunger, so he grabbed her, shook her and threw her against a wall, saying he would kill her if she did such a thing again. That's something I might do.

We know, according to news reports, that he had custody at one time, Julia says 7 months on the recording, so I'm guessing that's true. He likely filed for custody as a means to protect the kids and was granted temporary custody for several months.

As for the rest? Whisper to a small child over and over how daddy is going to take her way again but this time forever, how daddy hurt her, how daddy hurts mommy, how Armand will hurt her, how she will never get to ride her bike or have a princess castle again, how she will never again see Mommy, how Sky will be harmed, etc., wouldn't be long til' you end up with a screaming, writhing child, full of fear.

 

[SurfieTX]

I must give "mad props" to the folks here who nailed this initially. :applause:

 

[Irish_Eyes]

I didn't think her photos looked staged. What did I miss about Christian values and dating? Time to go get caught up on this thread.

 

[~n/t~]

I honestly don't see anything wrong in the pictures. They look like normal, healthy, happy kids. They don't look like starving abused kids to me.

 

[HRCODEPINK]

Factor in the last time Sky was seen, which is reportedly October 23, 2011.

LE definitely has not been sitting on their hands, that's for sure.

Too distraught to hunt for her child. Clearly she isn't too distraught to hunt for a man. :maddening: I have been at the dr all day with the little one. Obviously there is some serious catching up to do. I am already disappointed enough that Sky has not been found from what I have seen so far...hopefully I won't be disappointed to hear that she isn't in jail. :furious:

 

[Rougelatete]

The kids definitely look like they eat -- I agree that they do not look malnourished; I'm sure she (and SM) fed them. I'm just saying there's a plethora of photos of the kids eating....like JB had to prove something. Surely the kids engaged in other activities during the day than eating. Why isn't there more of a balance, is all I'm saying? Especially considering that one of the parenting concerns was around her feeding the kids. I just think it looks like she was trying to document something and that it wasn't all just fun times with the kids...riding bikes, playing with toys, playing dress up, goofing off, etc.

 

[DairyGirl]

Um, I just reread the info from that 'dating' website. Did anyone besides me take it to read she is looking for that as a, uh, salary range.

I am looking for a REAL man. YOU tell me YOUR 'ideal' arrangement!" The profile says "JB" expects "US$3,001 - $5,000 monthly."

Isn't that also known as prostitution?

 

[Patty G]

IMG_1573 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

Kid's bedroom?

You don't usually see interior doors with glass and lock like this. This is a common area room of some kind that they are using as a bedroom for both kids.

Note: no outlet protectors

More pics of the kid's "bedroom".

IMG_1573 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

IMG_1573 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

IMG_1573 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

Yep, not a bedroom. This is, in fact, the dinning room:

IMG_1573 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

:waitasec: All these photos are the same photo, of which appears to be the kitchen with "little" M sitting on the kitchen-counter.