Isn't it ridiculous that JA is actually going with the "gun just went off" in self-defense story? I guess when a defendant has nothing but lies to explain premeditated murder, then taking a gamble with self defense is the last resort as a defense.
I just don't see how any juror in their right mind could conclude that Travis was actually going to kill this woman because she dropped a camera. Gee whiz - I guess that's the best she could come up. Then she wants the jury to believe that a wet, naked man (who had just been shot in the head - according to her) still gave a crap about a camera and was still such a threat that she couldn't run out of the house. Hmmm, let's see - she could outrun him after being body slammed in order to get the gun to shoot him with, but she couldn't outrun him after she shot him? How ridiculous. And finally, she wants the jury to believe that after engaging in overkill to defend herself, she just drove away into the sunset - without calling 911 - to meet her next booty call because of a fog.