weekend discussion: discuss the trial here #141

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hear that? Audio CLIPS. Probably the phone sex tape broken down into clips, consistent with how some cell phones record phone calls.

I agree.. that is why I went and found and bumped up the testimony. LD examined a lot of things so it truly could be anything that the DT is trying to bring up.
 
Someone please tell me that we'll see Dr. Janeen DeMarte this week. I'm wondering how JM will set up the order of his witnesses during his rebuttal. Thoughts?
 
I'm so glad you drew attention to that, josie. It has been the theme of the defence case, avidly perpetuated by Alyce, that anything beyond the missionary position for purposes of procreation is either 'deviant' or '🤬🤬🤬🤬', with imaginary pedophilia thrown in for good measure.

So ironical when their client uses sex as a tool.

I hope the jurors are more open minded in their personal relations than this bunch!

my definition of 🤬🤬🤬🤬 has always been a sexual act on video.

if the DT are going to try and class topless photos of women as 🤬🤬🤬🤬 well that would make playboy or such magazines 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬's and to me thats not right. im sure there would be at least 1 juror who has purchased one of those types and i'd bet my house on it they don't view it as 🤬🤬🤬🤬
 
I agree. Houston is the boob job capital of the world. There are more breast enhancement surgeries performed here than anywhere else. In the 80s it was the trend to buy your daughter a boob job for a high school graduation gift, lol.

NOW I know why my BIL moved to Houston! Was always wondering why a CA guy who married a NE girl settled in Houston.

Well, maybe his job had a part but I'm going with the boob job capital of the world angle.

:floorlaugh:
 
Someone please tell me that we'll see Dr. Janeen DeMarte this week. I'm wondering how JM will set up the order of his witnesses during his rebuttal. Thoughts?

could be... the judge did seem to think that the extra friday would not be needed in may when adding on extra days.
 
Someone please tell me that we'll see Dr. Janeen DeMarte this week. I'm wondering how JM will set up the order of his witnesses during his rebuttal. Thoughts?

I can only hope that somehow we will start today and we will start with Demarte since we just saw ALV.

I know I am dreaming, but a girl has to dream.

K
 
Unless Travis is saying bring the little boys undies with you because I like to pretend you're a little boy when we are having sex... I don't want to hear it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, pretend that she's a little boy who wears pigtails! LMAO!

Didn't that ALV catch how silly that "corroboration" was?
 
Hear that? Audio CLIPS. Probably the phone sex tape broken down into clips, consistent with how some cell phones record phone calls.


Juan asked a witness (I think Samuels) if they knew whether it was the defendant pressing the record button "over and over again" on the sex tape...
 
The whole $300 boob job has to be a lie. I mean, you can't get a TOOTH taken out for that! LOL!!

She may have financed them and never paid, I don't know. Yes, you can finance things like that - with Care Credit. LOL!!

Where did this whole $300 thing come from anyway? I think it's just more lies from Jodi.

I never understood the $300.00 amount, and always figured it was 3K? My monthly insulin is $300.00 for a vial. No way can you get a boob job for that price unless it's underground. And I haven't heard of underground boobie jobs.

MOO

Mel
 
NOW I know why my BIL moved to Houston! Was always wondering why a CA guy who married a NE girl settled in Houston.

Well, maybe his job had a part but I'm going with the boob job capital of the world angle.

:floorlaugh:

We're also the strip club capital of the world! It's in our tourism guide.
 
And mean text messages after a break-up does not equate to domestic violence.

Private name calling does not equate to character assassination.

Nor does being a fan of the UFC and owning a punching bag make one a batterer.

But the defense brought that nonsense up anyway.
And if he were really an abuser, there'd be no need to grasp at such inane straws trying to paint him into one. There's next to no controlling behaviors on Travis' part that I can find - in fact, contrary to what I'd expect in someone who commits IPV; like encouraging the 'victim' to date others; lending them a car; 'writing off' a BMW instead of going ballistic over it; not coercing them into co-habitating or marriage; not stalking (at least by proxy) when the victim leaves the geographical area, etc, just to name a few.

I've had a feeling for quite awhile at least one juror is intimately knowledgeable of intimate partner violence too - perhaps not first hand - but something about the way a few questions have been worded make me believe that.

MOO
 
I felt the exact same way at first. Plus, to me she seemed knowledgable and experienced in her field. Then the cross started and it all went down hill. It took her 1/2 an hour and 5 side bars to answer a yes/no question, she was disrespectful to the prosecutor and the court, and she made herself look ignorant. I've watched several trials and I can't think of a witness that has been more annoying or that I've disliked more than her.

But...How do you REALLY feel? :floorlaugh:
 
We're also the strip club capital of the world! It's in our tourism guide.

LOL...makes perfect sense now.

BTW...he owns a piece of a wine bar if you ever want to organize a WS gathering. I'll make him give you guys a deal and use the boob job/strip club capital story as blackmail!
 
I had originally thought Alyce said porked but if it was corked what a waste of time for the defense. Imo

Morning Shady Lady.

We look like twins (avatar), don't you think??:floorlaugh:

Don't know how to change mine, yet.
 
I wonder if they are supposed to be a DT 'bombshell' and they've been holding off on them so they could finish their Case in Chief with them.



Jodi alluded to these tapes. I'm not sure if it was in the interrogation tapes or during testimony. Remember, she said she would try to record, but she would hang up and then realize she forgot to save it. Or, she said she would only get part of the conversation....... for some reason. (laugh, laugh) The reason she only got part is because she deleted the rest! She saved anything that made Travis look bad, and deleted anything that explained what Travis was mad about. These tapes will probably be so one-sided!

If these partial tapes are allowed in, then can Juan play the tape of her saying they are only "parts" of their conversation, and then her laughing about it? You know.....it's like she is saying, i'm just ditzy....nothing nefarious here!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
88
Guests online
574
Total visitors
662

Forum statistics

Threads
625,986
Messages
18,515,028
Members
240,891
Latest member
xprakruthix
Back
Top