Phoebeb
Active Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,298
- Reaction score
- 2
Being photo-savvy is quite different from being microchip savvy. You're overestimating her knowledge in computers. Even DeMarte, a college educated woman, assumed that submerging the camera in water would be enough to destroy the evidence. Up until three years ago, I would have thought the same thing and I'm one of those nerds who has built computers from the ground up.
It is cut and dry. It is a fact that the last three incriminating photos were found in allocated space. Ergo they were deleted manually *at the house* on June 4th. That shows two things, 1) she did not intend on taking the camera with her, 2) She did not intend on taking the memory card either.
I don't see a puzzle here, just a woman who made serious mistakes in her altering of the crime scene. She's no female Lex Luther. Just an average woman who failed, like many murderers before her.
So did she leave the sex photos on the camera and the shower photos that were not incriminating too? Only deleted the accidental shots?