weekend discussion: discuss the trial here #155

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think it would be hard to be home and not watch any of this
are talk to my family about it are maybe it's what they don't suppose to do so they just don't do it....What's you input on it ?

I think the biggest problem would be eating out and someone talking about it, how would you deal with the next table over talking about the case which is so big locally.
Also going to the store and seeing newspapers. So I guess IMO the jury knows more than what is happening in court.
 
Great Blog: http://kristinarandle.com/blog/jodi-arias-essays/

BBM

The medical examiner testified that the bullet, that Jodi has admitted firing into the head of Travis Alexander, resulted in the exploding of the frontal lobes of Mr. Alexander’s brain. According to his testimony, Mr. Alexander would have instantly become unconscious. Once unconscious, Mr. Alexander would be no threat to Jodi Arias. In the 29 stab wounds that Jodi Arias inflicted upon Travis, one of the wounds sliced a large blood vessel of the heart — the vena cava. The wound would have severely incapacitated Mr. Alexander. It would have caused him to bleed to death and upon its infliction, Mr. Alexander would no longer have been a threat to Jodi Arias. At some point, Ms. Arias cut Mr. Alexander’s throat from ear to ear. As I had mentioned earlier, all of the soft tissue had been cut and according to court testimony, Mr. Alexander had been nearly decapitated. According to the medical examiner’s testimony, within seconds of having had his throat cut, Mr. Alexander would have been rendered unconscious and thus no longer a threat to Ms. Arias. In essence, Jodi Arias killed Travis Alexander three times. Any one time would have been sufficient to render Travis Alexander a harmless threat to Ms. Arias.

Considering the M.E.'s testimony and the defensive wounds the jury should take about 1 minute to decide that the stabbing was first? Yes!
 
Would it? I don't think it would be in evidence unless the ballistics match.
Someone still could have turned it in thinking it might be the gun she used.
Once it's ruled out isn't that it?



Makes me wonder if they put some pictures onto a disc and viewed them or something.

I would not be surprised if she had someone follow Travis and record him coming and going,
Like some kind of video surveillance.

She said she took "cd's" to his house with pictures and he was trying to download them on his computer.

what if she was trying to plant child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on his computer???
during that 4:00 computer time

1- she told ALV TA had 🤬🤬🤬🤬 on his computer.
2- with all the backtracking they have done I won't be surprised if
that is why the forensic investigator Brown is being called to the stand.

I think DB and MM hepled Jodi make some kind of disc to blackmail Travis with.
I also think that they have proof she tried to set him up.:moo:

Makes you wonder if she did try to plant some kind of weirdness on his computer, but according to her, his computer wouldn't open images from her disks and gave him a virus warning, or some warning from his antivirus software. Who knows what happened that day, other than her killing him mercilessly.
 
No, no, no...what's surrebuttal? That is not fair...why would they get to surrebuttal or whatever it is...omigosh no I don't think I can take any more of their shenanigans. Please Please tell me this is not common, do you think JSS will allow it?

The DT thinks that something has come up or will come up (preemptive strike kinda thing) in rebuttal. Maybe Dr. D's diagnosis of BPD or perhaps the ring theft? Some arbitrary gun nonsense?

Even money that Judge Stephens will allow it, seeing how it's a death penalty case. Out of context emails were allowed, an edited replay of the sex tape was allowed- can't see her not letting them bring in more bs.
 
I'm going to try and get them today in about 1/2 hour. No need to pay so long as y'all are willing to take my word on what they say ;)

Of course we are! I am very interested- thanks again my dear!
 
PLEASE NOTE:

It is fine to disagree with another member. It is NOT fine to tell them what they meant in a negative way. Just say "did you mean to say..............?" It alleviates the acceleration that ends up in Snarksville. Also, if you state something as a fact, be prepared to link up. That's why we have that rule - if we link to facts then there are less misunderstandings. :kimsterwink:

Also, watch for our verified professionals. They can help clear things up much of the time. And if you are a verified professional and it doesn't read that under your name, please let one of the admins know and we'll fix it for you.

No more snark. If I see any more, there will be stunning involved. :notgood:

Also, if you are going to talk about the sexual aspects of the testimony, keep it on the trial and don't embellish the information. If you do, it's an automatic time out. We've warned you guys about that one for weeks now.
 
I'm quite sure I read--- the autopsy indicated he hadn't ejaculated prior to his death. But I've read so much, I'm not certain if that was someone's opinion or if it was indeed noted by the coroner.


Personally I don't believe for a minute he got off with Jodi that day.
Not. At. All.

The entire bed scene looked staged. Who keeps a bottle of KY on the bed when there were two night stands right there?
Nope.
This chick contrived this entire killing. From the moment she stole the gun until she straddled Ryan. It was ALL pre-planned and premeditated.

BBM

I'm trying to catch so I apologize if this has already been addressed - but is this true? I don't recall hearing this before. TIA.
 
I'm going to try and get them today in about 1/2 hour. No need to pay so long as y'all are willing to take my word on what they say ;)

Your awesome. If there is anything down the road you retrieve at a cost I would be happy to contribute. Thanks so much.
 
Here's AZ's longest Death Row inmate. If it doesn't go to AZ corrections type in Atwwod for the last name type in Frank Jarvis Atwood, 8 year old involved. He's been on DR since 1987. I want to see a resolve as I remember this horrible crime when it happened.

http://www.azcorrections.gov/inmate_datasearch/results.aspx?InmateNumber=062887&LastName=ATWOODFRANK J&SearchType=SearchInet

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/cri...cle_32895405-e566-506e-a6b8-b55482da6e52.html

Appeals seem to be the major cost & hang up for a swift and just crime involving the DP.

If we are going to have the DP, I'd say do it swiftly. Not this appeal process that goes on for 20 plus years, pushing 30 sometimes...I'm not for either LWOP or DP as they are written and carried out but if that's all we have now, that's all we have. Unbalanced justice. (if you get LWOP, you get to talk & socialize, if you get the DP, you get one hour per day alone & three showers a week and a few minutes for phone calls & this can last for years upon years,

That's not the DP, just a fact we all face one day of growing older (death that is, not shower time etc...) jmo

I'd love to be a fly on the wall in those sealed sidebar & chamber meetings right now.
i scrolled to the bottom of your first link, and have a question. how can he be isolated
23 hrs/day, and be on work detail? just curious. TIA
 
Great Blog: http://kristinarandle.com/blog/jodi-arias-essays/

BBM

The medical examiner testified that the bullet, that Jodi has admitted firing into the head of Travis Alexander, resulted in the exploding of the frontal lobes of Mr. Alexander’s brain. According to his testimony, Mr. Alexander would have instantly become unconscious. Once unconscious, Mr. Alexander would be no threat to Jodi Arias. In the 29 stab wounds that Jodi Arias inflicted upon Travis, one of the wounds sliced a large blood vessel of the heart — the vena cava. The wound would have severely incapacitated Mr. Alexander. It would have caused him to bleed to death and upon its infliction, Mr. Alexander would no longer have been a threat to Jodi Arias. At some point, Ms. Arias cut Mr. Alexander’s throat from ear to ear. As I had mentioned earlier, all of the soft tissue had been cut and according to court testimony, Mr. Alexander had been nearly decapitated. According to the medical examiner’s testimony, within seconds of having had his throat cut, Mr. Alexander would have been rendered unconscious and thus no longer a threat to Ms. Arias. In essence, Jodi Arias killed Travis Alexander three times. Any one time would have been sufficient to render Travis Alexander a harmless threat to Ms. Arias.

Someone posted a video in this thread that included an image of the police report of the burglary at her grandparent's home. The .25 caliber gun that was reported stolen was loaded with jacketed hollow point bullets. Very damaging bullets.
 
Thats the same thing I was thinking things that don't come out in court
they might hear on TV are from a family members that have been keeping up
with the trail.
 
PLEASE NOTE:

It is fine to disagree with another member. It is NOT fine to tell them what they meant in a negative way. Just say "did you mean to say..............?" It alleviates the acceleration that ends up in Snarksville. Also, if you state something as a fact, be prepared to link up. That's why we have that rule - if we link to facts then there are less misunderstandings. :kimsterwink:

Also, watch for our verified professionals. They can help clear things up much of the time. And if you are a verified professional and it doesn't read that under your name, please let one of the admins know and we'll fix it for you.

No more snark. If I see any more, there will be stunning involved. :notgood:

Also, if you are going to talk about the sexual aspects of the testimony, keep it on the trial and don't embellish the information. If you do, it's an automatic time out. We've warned you guys about that one for weeks now.


My apologies Kimster! :truce:
 
Starting a new thread and closing this one - so pay attention and get ready to move over. I'm not Nurse/Fran/Harmony and I don't give 5 minute warnings. :eek:

Salem
 
By May 26th, Travis had had enough. At the time of his death he knew:
She was a sociopath
He was just a dildo with a heartbeat
She was a liar
She was a stalker
He was afraid of her
She slashed his tires....TWICE
She crawled in the doggie dog unannounced/uninvited
Entered the house using unauthorized code/keypad
Spied on Lisa/Travis
Sent Lisa an anonymous email
Hacked his email
Hacked his FaceBook
Accessed his bank account
Listened to his voice mail
Went through his camera
Hacked his computer
Stole his journal
Stole his ring
Trashed his car
Owed him money
Most likely blackmailed him with the phone-sex tape so..............

do you REALLY, I mean REALLY think he screwed her that day with KY jelly?
C'mon now. No one is that hard up (no pun intended)

That is what I was referring to which was not adding up. June 4th, I believe, did NOT go down the way she or the State is saying it did. I can't nor won't believe Travis had sex with her.

Yes, I do absolutely believe they had sex that day.

He enjoyed the sex he had with Jodi. It was her one redeeming quality. He likes sex and its not like he had lots of other options. Being Mormon kinda makes normal evolutionary biological needs wrong outside of marriage.

I do think Travis suffers from that whole Madonna -🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 thing. I don't believe they immediately, upon dating had sexual relations..... as Jodi claims. I think he viewed her much differently after they had sex and by then he was hooked. She was like a 14 year old boys fantasy come true.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
So with all this anal talk - I'm guessing there's no court today :) I'm not too sure why it's being debated the dilation of the anus... I hate to break it to anyone who thinks it's only caused by having a BM but that's false sweetie. It's caused by insertion and if someone does it frequently etc - it becomes prolapsed * YOU CAN HAVE a prolapsed anus from other causes too* . Anyone here who's worked in a hospice setting has probably seen one or two. It isn't pretty.

*shiver*

I watched the JA 48 hour's episode last night - I suggest if you've not watched it in awhile to do so. I think I figured out how to notice when she's lying (at least concerning things she's making up as she goes). Anything she's practiced she's very matter of fact but stuff she's winging isn't not so matter of fact. She uses the terms:


Uh
If I were going to
If it was me
If
Um

Someone else mentioned it but - is there photos we've not seen?

in the interview w flores he says how many photos they recovered. there are several we havent seen
 
I think it would be hard to be home and not watch any of this
are talk to my family about it are maybe it's what they don't suppose to do so they just don't do it....What's you input on it ?

I think they talk about it. JMO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
100
Guests online
442
Total visitors
542

Forum statistics

Threads
625,879
Messages
18,512,551
Members
240,873
Latest member
akuyamo
Back
Top