Youre right, my mistake.Watching you said:Not to be picky, but shouldn't that be Dec. 24, '96?
Youre right, my mistake.Watching you said:Not to be picky, but shouldn't that be Dec. 24, '96?
Excellent point. PR has to be dragged away from her dead child then they are ready to fly off to another state.narlacat said:How the Ramsey's could have just walked out and left their precious daughter lying beside that tree that day, I will never know.
Heartless is right.
I have yet to hear one story about Patsy having to be dragged away from 'that child'. They couldnt get out of there fast enough. It's called distancing.
I guess they were monitoring all the phones, I know at one stage John's cell phone was used by LE. Noone seemed to mention it when the time came and went and no call had come in.
I think their plan was to get Burke on that plane as fast as they could.I can think of no other plausable reason for their actions that morning.narlacat said:How the Ramsey's could have just walked out and left their precious daughter lying beside that tree that day, I will never know.
Heartless is right.
I have yet to hear one story about Patsy having to be dragged away from 'that child'. They couldnt get out of there fast enough. It's called distancing.
I guess they were monitoring all the phones, I know at one stage John's cell phone was used by LE. Noone seemed to mention it when the time came and went and no call had come in.
The house is a crime scene.narlacat said:How the Ramsey's could have just walked out and left their precious daughter lying beside that tree that day, I will never know.
Heartless is right.
I have yet to hear one story about Patsy having to be dragged away from 'that child'. They couldnt get out of there fast enough. It's called distancing.
I guess they were monitoring all the phones, I know at one stage John's cell phone was used by LE. Noone seemed to mention it when the time came and went and no call had come in.
The gist of the ransom note was for JR to not call police, get money, wait for a call between 8 and 10 AM, or else they would 'behead' his daughter.narlacat said:How the Ramsey's could have just walked out and left their precious daughter lying beside that tree that day, I will never know.
Heartless is right.
I have yet to hear one story about Patsy having to be dragged away from 'that child'. They couldnt get out of there fast enough. It's called distancing.
I guess they were monitoring all the phones, I know at one stage John's cell phone was used by LE. Noone seemed to mention it when the time came and went and no call had come in.
Holdontoyourhat said:The beheading term has never been used before in reference to a child, and the term was linked to JR's actions in the morning hours.
Why?
Because the intruders were 'distancing'.
Zman said:The house is a crime scene.
I think the R's were asked to leave the house.
I don't think they'd be allowed to take JBR with them.
It's not their falt JBR laid in the house and the corener didn't show up till 7 pm to remove the body. I'm sure they were not to happy about that either.
Well, admittedly I haven't read all Ramsey case related books and I haven't read DOI except the little bits I pick up on the forum, but in all the reading I have done I haven't read anywhere anything about Patsy and John being unhappy../..put out../..devastated about their having to leave their daughter's body that day.Zman said:The house is a crime scene.
I think the R's were asked to leave the house.
I don't think they'd be allowed to take JBR with them.
It's not their falt JBR laid in the house and the corener didn't show up till 7 pm to remove the body. I'm sure they were not to happy about that either.
Zman said:The house is a crime scene.
I think the R's were asked to leave the house.
I don't think they'd be allowed to take JBR with them.
It's not their falt JBR laid in the house and the corener didn't show up till 7 pm to remove the body. I'm sure they were not to happy about that either.
Brefie said:There has never been a mention of the R's being unhappy to leave the house with JBR stil laid there. EVERYTHING they say is to the contrary.
Not to mention a LOT of people think it is precisely their fault that JBR was laying their dead.
What (on Earth) does Alice in Wonderland have to do with the real murder of JBR. I think I'll stick to my claim that nobody has (in actual real life, not in a fantasy make-believe story) used the term behead in reference to a child before.why_nutt said:Never in reference to a child? So you have never read Alice In Wonderland, where the Queen threatens to behead Alice.
Oh, and where appears this overlap with the ransom note's reaction.
`There's more evidence to come yet, please your Majesty,' said the White Rabbit, jumping up in a great hurry; `this paper has just been picked up.'
`What's in it?' said the Queen.
`I haven't opened it yet,' said the White Rabbit, `but it seems to be a letter, written by the prisoner to--to somebody.'
`It must have been that,' said the King, `unless it was written to nobody, which isn't usual, you know.'
`Who is it directed to?' said one of the jurymen.
`It isn't directed at all,' said the White Rabbit; `in fact, there's nothing written on the outside.' He unfolded the paper as he spoke, and added `It isn't a letter, after all: it's a set of verses.'
`Are they in the prisoner's handwriting?' asked another of they jurymen.
`No, they're not,' said the White Rabbit, `and that's the queerest thing about it.' (The jury all looked puzzled.)
`He must have imitated somebody else's hand,' said the King. (The jury all brightened up again.)
The ransom note was fantasy! ( as in make believe!)Holdontoyourhat said:What (on Earth) does Alice in Wonderland have to do with the real murder of JBR. I think I'll stick to my claim that nobody has (in actual real life, not in a fantasy make-believe story) used the term behead in reference to a child before.
NP, I never even thought about it that way until you just said it, but you are right. The public is more concerned with seeing justice prevail. But then again, we are expecting too much of them. After all, they did say on national tv they wanted to "move on".Nuisanceposter said:And to this day, strangers still care more about JonBenet and what happened to her than her own parents do. We are the ones keeping this going, we are the ones searching for the killer or at least some answers, while they continue to do nothing except whatever they think serves themselves, not their murdered daughter, best.
The ransom note was an actual, real manuscript of one of JBR's killers. No fantasy there.narlacat said:The ransom note was fantasy! ( as in make believe!)
Holdontoyourhat said:The ransom note was an actual, real manuscript of one of JBR's killers. No fantasy there.
I didn't know that, Hold/Hat. Do you have a link so I can read more?Holdontoyourhat said:What (on Earth) does Alice in Wonderland have to do with the real murder of JBR. I think I'll stick to my claim that nobody has (in actual real life, not in a fantasy make-believe story) used the term behead in reference to a child before.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.