What Is the Defense Strategy #2

The defense could be planning to pin Caylee's murder on someone else in Casey's family, possibly her father George.

Even the Anthonys' lawyer admits they're getting that indication.

http://www.wftv.com/news/27793602/detail.html

Maybe not so preposterous...:doh:

Oh I don't think it's preposterous to thing the DT would DO that. I think it's preposterous to believe that GA or CA or LA murdered sweet Caylee.
 
I think the DT is going to say that it was an accident. Neither GA or ICA had a relialble job for years. I think GA and ICA had an agreement prior to Caylee's death that they would cover for each other so that CA would not realize that they both weren't always working. In other words, if GA lost his job he would be at home during the day and ICA and him would hang out with Caylee. GA is going to be embarassed that hiim and CA were hiding these facts from ICA. CA and GA had come up with the "nanny" so that if CA asked where Caylee was that they would say the nanny if she was with George or with ICA so that CA would not worry. This will show that they were both fearfull of CA's reaction to finding out the truth. ICA will use the excuse that since GA wasn't working a regular job that she was use to coming and going on a whim and GA watching Caylee. She is going to say that she thought he was watching her and he is going to say that she thought she left with CA. Then Caylee drowned and CA found her. She came up with the kidnapping story and used the nanny story that her and GA had concocted. Although I don't believe that GA knew about the drowning, I do believe that once she started using the nanny story that he knew that CA was really with her with it happened because he knew it wasn't him. At that point he knew that what started out as a small plot to keep work information from CA had turned into a huge lie that could come back to cause him all sorts of problems. ICA decided to come up with the kidnapping story and used the duct tape to create a kidnap story and assumed that because her dad had used the nanny story with her that he would be her backup as proof that there was a nanny. GA has been torn during this whole thing between the loss of his granddaughter, which he never thought would happen because of the nanny coverup. CA was so sure that there was a nanny because ICA and GA had used the name so many times when Caylee was not there. At the trial the truth will come out that CA and GA made up the nanny as a "family joke" and ICA and GA don't want CA to know the depth of lies that they had used. GA hasn't been at the hearings because he knows the truth and can see the bus coming. He loved ICA and Caylee and never thought that the little lie that they kept from CA would ever come to this. ICA is going to show that GA knew there was no nanny. That is why she wanted the privatte meeting with GA and why he wanted to see her so much. GA is afraid the whole truth will come out and CA will blame him as much for this as CA and then he will be own his own with no job and no CA to live off of. This is just MHO
 
I just don't see how they can say it was an accident. JB himself said that the "crime" had already occurred when talking about the party pictures. :waitasec: How can the "crime" be an accident? :waitasec:
 
I think the DT is going to say that it was an accident. Neither GA or ICA had a relialble job for years. I think GA and ICA had an agreement prior to Caylee's death that they would cover for each other so that CA would not realize that they both weren't always working. In other words, if GA lost his job he would be at home during the day and ICA and him would hang out with Caylee. GA is going to be embarassed that hiim and CA were hiding these facts from ICA. CA and GA had come up with the "nanny" so that if CA asked where Caylee was that they would say the nanny if she was with George or with ICA so that CA would not worry. This will show that they were both fearfull of CA's reaction to finding out the truth. ICA will use the excuse that since GA wasn't working a regular job that she was use to coming and going on a whim and GA watching Caylee. She is going to say that she thought he was watching her and he is going to say that she thought she left with CA. Then Caylee drowned and CA found her. She came up with the kidnapping story and used the nanny story that her and GA had concocted. Although I don't believe that GA knew about the drowning, I do believe that once she started using the nanny story that he knew that CA was really with her with it happened because he knew it wasn't him. At that point he knew that what started out as a small plot to keep work information from CA had turned into a huge lie that could come back to cause him all sorts of problems. ICA decided to come up with the kidnapping story and used the duct tape to create a kidnap story and assumed that because her dad had used the nanny story with her that he would be her backup as proof that there was a nanny. GA has been torn during this whole thing between the loss of his granddaughter, which he never thought would happen because of the nanny coverup. CA was so sure that there was a nanny because ICA and GA had used the name so many times when Caylee was not there. At the trial the truth will come out that CA and GA made up the nanny as a "family joke" and ICA and GA don't want CA to know the depth of lies that they had used. GA hasn't been at the hearings because he knows the truth and can see the bus coming. He loved ICA and Caylee and never thought that the little lie that they kept from CA would ever come to this. ICA is going to show that GA knew there was no nanny. That is why she wanted the privatte meeting with GA and why he wanted to see her so much. GA is afraid the whole truth will come out and CA will blame him as much for this as CA and then he will be own his own with no job and no CA to live off of. This is just MHO

I don't think for one minute that GA knew about Caylee's death in the beginning. His friend Jim and Cindy had to physically pull him out of ICA's room when she was out on bail. He told her to fess up & that's when she told him to quit acting like a cop.
 
I just don't see how they can say it was an accident. JB himself said that the "crime" had already occurred when talking about the party pictures. :waitasec: How can the "crime" be an accident? :waitasec:

I hope they play the video where CA is collapsing with grief and tells ICA that the rumor is Caylee drowned and ICA says "surprise surprise."
 
I don't think for one minute that GA knew about Caylee's death in the beginning. His friend Jim and Cindy had to physically pull him out of ICA's room when she was out on bail. He told her to fess up & that's when she told him to quit acting like a cop.

I don't think he knew about it in the beginning. I think as long as ICA told CA that she was with the nanny that GA understood that Caylee was with ICA and that it was understood that ICA was with the current boyfriend. I think GA realized that there was something wrong when the car was towed. When he smelled the death smell and could account for ICA, he knew it was Caylee. He knew his lieing to Cindy about the nanny and that him and ICA had both gotten money from CA and that it was all about to come out. He and ICA had both been going to non-existent jobs at times and GA had gotten into money trouble with ICA had. That was their bond...both lieing to CA. I think he is very distraught about Caylee being dead. His attacking her was his "I can't believe you took it this far" moment....JMHO
 
I don't think he knew about it in the beginning. I think as long as ICA told CA that she was with the nanny that GA understood that Caylee was with ICA and that it was understood that ICA was with the current boyfriend. I think GA realized that there was something wrong when the car was towed. When he smelled the death smell and could account for ICA, he knew it was Caylee. He knew his lieing to Cindy about the nanny and that him and ICA had both gotten money from CA and that it was all about to come out. He and ICA had both been going to non-existent jobs at times and GA had gotten into money trouble with ICA had. That was their bond...both lieing to CA. I think he is very distraught about Caylee being dead. His attacking her was his "I can't believe you took it this far" moment....JMHO

Maybe I need to get some more coffee down me for this to sink in.:floorlaugh:

He was trying to trip ICA up by following her when she would leave the house and IIRC , it was CA that told GA to leave ICA to her. She would handle her. Great thoughts though. :)
 
ICA told RGrund after he didn't want his other son/family to continue to watch Caylee, she found a nanny...that was when she and JGs engagement broke off, shortly after...according to JG, the reason given was, he loved Caylee more than he loved her...who thinks this way? She should have been honored JG wanted to raise Caylee as his own...insert CA here...I also believe it was her doing that this engagement was broken...this was late 2007, correct? CA didn't like JG due to standing up to her when she was demeaning ICA...seems she always demeaned her...I still want to know what CA saw in ICA to tell some of her friends, she was a sociopath and a pathological liar...to stay away from her...just as she told TonyL, she hoped he had lots of money in the bank for she'd rob you blind...she alienatated ICA from many friends or so it appears...She wanted ICA and Caylee to remain dependant on her. This caused ICA to never really mature..ICA is emotionally immature..even her thoughts are immature...too bad she didn't realize or cared that she could have enjoyed life WITH Caylee by her side...she's not the only young single woman raising a child...I had two children by the time I was 22...mine are now adults with children of their own..life is what you make it and it appears ICA didn't like being tied down...again, insert CA who forced her to keep Caylee...

It appears ICA has been plotting this since then. She had newfound friends who had their freedom, went to college, worked, she only pretended to do what they all were doing, to fit in with them. As JG has much information into the mind of ICA, her actions speak louder than words could ever speak...in her lies therein lies some truth...she is a spiteful biatch for her mother made her that way...vengeance runs deep..it appears CA sabatoges ICA every which way she can...and still does even if she doesn't mean to...it's in her character...she did the same with TM and YM...no one messes with the Anthony family....:loser:

I believe the defense will place blame on CA and her parenting....JMHO

Justice for Caylee
 
The last interview with Only Casey knows....

CA stated, Caylee wasn't just KC's child, she belonged to all of us...she was OUR child...

I believe CA created sibling rivalry attitude within ICA...CA minimized ICA's role as mother. It was CA who supported them all...particularly ICA and Caylee...I only wonder if CA ever told ICA, you only babysit Caylee..You are her daytime nanny for you leave her with me at nights...while she pretends to work (CA knew she didn't work) but never truly confronted her or asked about her paychecks...I believe she created the monster within ICA and now it's too late to undo any of it...dominating, controlling, demeaning, condescending...all negatives when you have a child (ICA) who has mental problems to begin with...I truly believe ICA should have gone with the diminished capacity defense...coming out now that it was an accident doesn't fit the evidence...JMHO

Justice for Caylee
 
I just don't see how they can say it was an accident. JB himself said that the "crime" had already occurred when talking about the party pictures. :waitasec: How can the "crime" be an accident? :waitasec:

I asked that on the lawyer thread; to me it sounded like a fatal slip also, not only does he NOT state it was an accident he confirms the date of the crime too! AZ thought he was stating it that way because the SA alleges a crime was committed.
If I had an accident or was defending someone who had an accident with a child it would not occur to me to call it a crime, regardless of what the SA alleged.
 
ICA told RGrund after he didn't want his other son/family to continue to watch Caylee, she found a nanny...that was when she and JGs engagement broke off, shortly after...according to JG, the reason given was, he loved Caylee more than he loved her...who thinks this way? She should have been honored JG wanted to raise Caylee as his own...insert CA here...I also believe it was her doing that this engagement was broken...this was late 2007, correct? CA didn't like JG due to standing up to her when she was demeaning ICA...seems she always demeaned her...I still want to know what CA saw in ICA to tell some of her friends, she was a sociopath and a pathological liar...to stay away from her...just as she told TonyL, she hoped he had lots of money in the bank for she'd rob you blind...she alienatated ICA from many friends or so it appears...She wanted ICA and Caylee to remain dependant on her. This caused ICA to never really mature..ICA is emotionally immature..even her thoughts are immature...too bad she didn't realize or cared that she could have enjoyed life WITH Caylee by her side...she's not the only young single woman raising a child...I had two children by the time I was 22...mine are now adults with children of their own..life is what you make it and it appears ICA didn't like being tied down...again, insert CA who forced her to keep Caylee...

It appears ICA has been plotting this since then. She had newfound friends who had their freedom, went to college, worked, she only pretended to do what they all were doing, to fit in with them. As JG has much information into the mind of ICA, her actions speak louder than words could ever speak...in her lies therein lies some truth...she is a spiteful biatch for her mother made her that way...vengeance runs deep..it appears CA sabatoges ICA every which way she can...and still does even if she doesn't mean to...it's in her character...she did the same with TM and YM...no one messes with the Anthony family....:loser:

I believe the defense will place blame on CA and her parenting....JMHO

Justice for Caylee

ITA. In the FBI interview it's clear CA never wanted her kids to grow up and leave home. They were "smart" or "gifted" but never encouraged to go away to college. I absolutely think CA manipulated ICA into breaking up with JG as well...I have always thought that.
 
While I do like the theories y'all are coming up with, the "accident" theory will never work. Casey isn't gonna testify, and so the fact remains, her nanny story is her words. The DT can't testify for her. They have some awful high hurdles to jump, and I can't wait to see how high they leap. Trial can't come soon enough for me.
 
We do not pass on rumors from other sites regarding what they think is going to happen regarding Casey's attire.
 
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/en...ikable-and-very-bright-cheney-mason-says.html
When I read (in the link above) that CM described ICA as far more emotional than people see, but that jail has toughened her up, my first thought was wow, it must not have taken her very long to toughen up by listening to her first phone call home from jail. Also, she sure doesn't sound to me like she much afraid of CA in this phone call either.
AUDIO: Full phone call of Casey Anthony from jail
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/orl-casey-anthony-jail-full-mp3,0,4942958.mp3file
 
The last interview with Only Casey knows....

CA stated, Caylee wasn't just KC's child, she belonged to all of us...she was OUR child...

I believe CA created sibling rivalry attitude within ICA...CA minimized ICA's role as mother. It was CA who supported them all...particularly ICA and Caylee...I only wonder if CA ever told ICA, you only babysit Caylee..You are her daytime nanny for you leave her with me at nights...while she pretends to work (CA knew she didn't work) but never truly confronted her or asked about her paychecks...I believe she created the monster within ICA and now it's too late to undo any of it...dominating, controlling, demeaning, condescending...all negatives when you have a child (ICA) who has mental problems to begin with...I truly believe ICA should have gone with the diminished capacity defense...coming out now that it was an accident doesn't fit the evidence...JMHO

Justice for Caylee

With respect, I believe anyone who believes CA shaped or created the "monster ICA" or controlled her behavior at any time in her life should watch the film titled, I, Psychopath, about Sam Vaknin,a man who is both a psychopath and a Narcissist, to see how he interacts with his wife,and the director of this film. You will see how brutal the interaction is and why the director, although he only spent several months with Sam, believes he will never be the same again.

There is no way CA ever controlled this relationship or ICA. The film can be found at http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/i-psychopath/

It will also explain many of CA's bizarre behaviors. IMO
 
When I think of an "accident defense" then I ask why would ICA have deleted photos of Caylee from her photobucket acc on the same day? What Mom would do this? I believe after she did what she did to Caylee her last dig to her mother was to delete Caylees photos. They were deleted on June 16th. Remember "what is given can be taken away" by ICA.
 
I think the DT is going to say that it was an accident. Neither GA or ICA had a relialble job for years. I think GA and ICA had an agreement prior to Caylee's death that they would cover for each other so that CA would not realize that they both weren't always working. In other words, if GA lost his job he would be at home during the day and ICA and him would hang out with Caylee. GA is going to be embarassed that hiim and CA were hiding these facts from ICA. CA and GA had come up with the "nanny" so that if CA asked where Caylee was that they would say the nanny if she was with George or with ICA so that CA would not worry. This will show that they were both fearfull of CA's reaction to finding out the truth. ICA will use the excuse that since GA wasn't working a regular job that she was use to coming and going on a whim and GA watching Caylee. She is going to say that she thought he was watching her and he is going to say that she thought she left with CA. Then Caylee drowned and CA found her. She came up with the kidnapping story and used the nanny story that her and GA had concocted. Although I don't believe that GA knew about the drowning, I do believe that once she started using the nanny story that he knew that CA was really with her with it happened because he knew it wasn't him. At that point he knew that what started out as a small plot to keep work information from CA had turned into a huge lie that could come back to cause him all sorts of problems. ICA decided to come up with the kidnapping story and used the duct tape to create a kidnap story and assumed that because her dad had used the nanny story with her that he would be her backup as proof that there was a nanny. GA has been torn during this whole thing between the loss of his granddaughter, which he never thought would happen because of the nanny coverup. CA was so sure that there was a nanny because ICA and GA had used the name so many times when Caylee was not there. At the trial the truth will come out that CA and GA made up the nanny as a "family joke" and ICA and GA don't want CA to know the depth of lies that they had used. GA hasn't been at the hearings because he knows the truth and can see the bus coming. He loved ICA and Caylee and never thought that the little lie that they kept from CA would ever come to this. ICA is going to show that GA knew there was no nanny. That is why she wanted the privatte meeting with GA and why he wanted to see her so much. GA is afraid the whole truth will come out and CA will blame him as much for this as CA and then he will be own his own with no job and no CA to live off of. This is just MHO

KC tested the name 'Zanny' once or twice with friends/family. She only started using it after Caylee's death.

GA and CA were lying when they said they heard the name for more than a year.
 
While I do like the theories y'all are coming up with, the "accident" theory will never work. Casey isn't gonna testify, and so the fact remains, her nanny story is her words. The DT can't testify for her. They have some awful high hurdles to jump, and I can't wait to see how high they leap. Trial can't come soon enough for me.

I don't know. Can't the DT say everything is consistent with an accident?? Or, can't they point the finger at GA without KC testifying?
 
KC tested the name 'Zanny' once or twice with friends/family. She only started using it after Caylee's death.

GA and CA were lying when they said they heard the name for more than a year.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0809/22/ng.01.html

GRACE: That is mom, Casey Anthony, in new recordings released of the police interrogation of Casey Anthony. She is referring to what many people believe to be an imaginary nanny named Zenaida Gonzalez.

Back to the father of Casey Anthony`s ex-fiance. Richard Grund is with us. Did you ever are know of this nanny, see her, talk to her, hear of her?

GRUND: I never saw her or spoke to her, but I did hear of her. I heard of her in April of `06, when Casey lost her regular baby-sitter. As I said, Jesse would watch her. I would watch her. She tried to get my high-school-age son to watch her, which meant I watched her because I have an office in my home.

Finally, one day when Casey came home from work to wait for Jesse and hang out with us, I kind of greeted her at the door with, What are we going to do about this baby-sitter thing? And she says, I found one. I have a nanny. Her name is Zanny, and I got her from Jeffrey Hopkins, who has a son named...
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
592
Total visitors
765

Forum statistics

Threads
626,021
Messages
18,515,779
Members
240,893
Latest member
Noob
Back
Top