K_Z
Verified Anesthetist
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2010
- Messages
- 6,657
- Reaction score
- 2,507
I have another reason to suggest. Theoretically, if one or more additional children were involved in Max's accident, there may have been a desire to protect the other children by reporting it as an accident involving only Max. In such a case, there could have been a continuing desire to protect those children (or child, depending on the number of children involved) by pressing news outlets to scrub any information that hinted at the involvement of other children or deviated from the officially released version of events in any way. Additionally, Rebecca's death could've added to the desire to protect others as there may have been concern about violent action taken against anyone believed to be involved. (IIRC, there were special measures taken to protect the dog when he emerged from the kennel.) And, theoretically, if LE was misled about the details of Max's accident, there may have been concerns about legal repercussions as the result of conflicting information coming to light, particularly after Rebecca's death.
This is all pure speculation on my part. Just my opinion.
BBM
I completely agree with this scenario. I have often felt that the actions of some of the key players were designed to protect any accusations against the older children. These kids may or may not have been present when Max had his accident, but it's my opinion that they had some knowledge or involvement in whatever occurred that produced Max's fall.
It seems to me that they have been shielded and protected, in a way that XZ has not. More and more, as time goes on, XZ is emerging as the chosen scapegoat by Dina and others, imo.