Gardenista
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 19,034
- Reaction score
- 157,599
LoL she spelled b-i-a-s for him!!!!
So she's done tackett, biast. I wonder if substained is next lol
LoL she spelled b-i-a-s for him!!!!
Yep, have to agree that’s what’s going on.IMO, he is stalling again, to avoid testimony coming regarding his arrest
I don't think he's all that smart. He's just an unhinged bozo who is now getting the "important" attention he so craves. This might very well be the high point of his miserable crazy life.I feel like he is intentionally trying to make things harder for the witnesses by interrupting and asking unnecessary questions. Like making the cop explain what it means that he's "pretty good with cars." He is obviously intelligent enough to find semi-related caselaw and sometimes put together decent sounding legal arguments. The judge has directed him to the hearsay statute multiple times and even explained the meaning to him. Yet, he is still objecting on questions where they are asking for the witnesses recollection of an event, or even their own opinion. It is frustrating to watch.
Here we go again! This is what I’m talking about. What is up with this judge! Stop explaining over and over! Just rule and move on!
Edited to add: She does NOT have to talk about umpires etc. Or explain herself. She lets him talk back after she’s ruled when she doesn’t have to. That’s not an appealable issue.
Agree and he is playing her like a fiddle. She owes him no explanation. He knows he is getting under her skin and that is his objective.Here we go again! This is what I’m talking about. What is up with this judge! Stop explaining over and over! Just rule and move on!
Edited to add: She does NOT have to talk about umpires etc. Or explain herself. She lets him talk back after she’s ruled when she doesn’t have to. That’s not an appealable issue.
I like the judge. She is extending him every courtesy possible. He is annoying but I really like how respectful she is about this. This guy is fighting for his life and he is ignorant. When he loses he will have nobody to blame but himself.'Sorry, I'm behind and didn't see this before I posted. ITA with you. I'm disappointed with the judge.
Exactly! I can no longer give her a pass with the whole ‘oh she’s making sure this case doesn’t get appealed.’ All she needs to do now is allow him to cross examine and that’s it! He’s like a broken record with the other nonsense - she’s already addressed it and doesn’t need to go back and forth!Agree and he is playing her like a fiddle. She owes him no explanation. He knows he is getting under her skin and that is his objective.
Sadly, this pathetic piece of nothing will never accept blame for anything.I like the judge. She is extending him every courtesy possible. He is annoying but I really like how respectful she is about this. This guy is fighting for his life and he is ignorant. When he loses he will have nobody to blame but himself.
He will never accept any blame. He can’t even identify himself as Darrell E Brooks, the defendant, who murdered 6 people.I like the judge. She is extending him every courtesy possible. He is annoying but I really like how respectful she is about this. This guy is fighting for his life and he is ignorant. When he loses he will have nobody to blame but himself.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.