He knew exactly what to expect and who was home. He knew their pattern or had inside info. Weeks or longer. And no one notices?
this does not make it random. moo. this makes it stalked.
He knew exactly what to expect and who was home. He knew their pattern or had inside info. Weeks or longer. And no one notices?
I can’t understand why anyone wants to hear it. Do they think they will pick up something all of the trained technicians cannot?? Curiosity? I just don’t get it...but jmo
Thank you for this link to the Simants story Darkstar105.It's happened before: 38 years later, Simants murder case still raises tough questions
Not only that, but I think he’s likely got an extensive criminal record.
This is highly unlikely to have been his first crime.
Sure, with knowledge of what to expect and some preparation.then I think *COULD* have been initiated and finished in less than 5 min. just from a technical thought, but I doubt it was done that rapidly.
Why do you think it was necessary that this crime required so much planning?
It’s a messy way to commit an otherwise well planned crime.
Unless it wasn’t well planned at all.
I'm curious who has heard it. Family, friends, other people who might recognize voices?
Likely just people within LE. If there were discernible voices in that recording, other than the caller, they would certainly play it for family members, and release it to the public.I'm curious who has heard it. Family, friends, other people who might recognize voices?
Sometimes good luck can look like good planning.It's interesting how most opinions fall into two camps.. either it was totally random or it was planned with military precision. I guess it seemed planned because the perp(s) encountered no big dogs, cameras, nosy neighbors, motion sensors, etc.. but it seems random because no obvious motive.
OK, walk me through the random criminal theory...Why do you think it was necessary that this crime required so much planning?
It’s a messy way to commit an otherwise well planned crime.
Unless it wasn’t well planned at all.
if person A has a firearm and person B does not then person A has control of the whole situation, I think luck is playing as much a part as planning.Sure, with knowledge of what to expect and some preparation.
Thank you. I was able to listen. He said four minutes..
How could they possibly know that. It makes no sense
OK, walk me through the random criminal theory...
Yes. Sorry if wasn’t clearBBM: This is just your opinion, right?
I cant see it likely at all that someone just randomly drives up, kicks door starts blazing. Sure things might have gone wrong. Younger guy, takes more risk, less experience. Older experienced guy or well trained, watches more, plans, takes fewer risks. Team of 2 perhaps.if person A has a firearm and person B does not then person A has control of the whole situation, I think luck is playing as much a part as planning.
"We have to realize they were probably only in that residence for four minutes. Or you know, we were there within four minutes, they were gone."
I truly do not believe he meant to imply that the assailant(s) were in the house for only 4 minutes.
And are you local or just passin through?Random crimes like this are rare, but I’ll humor you.
I’ll use the Cheshire murders as a bit of a model, although that was a robbery that turned into rape and multiple murder.
I’m a drug using criminal with a history of sexual deviance. I have a gun in my vehicle.
I encounter Jayme and her mother at some point during the day of the attack. I want Jayme.
I follow them home, and discover to my delight, that the house is relatively secluded.
I leave, get something to eat, and perhaps use drugs or alcohol.
I engage the house late that night, when I know the family will be sleeping. I kill the parents, and kidnap Jayme.
I escape, not by good planning, but with good luck.
Now I don’t think this is what happened, but that’s how a random crime could occur.