BlinkOfAnI
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 14, 2015
- Messages
- 2,006
- Reaction score
- 8,731
Thank you for the reply and for being so considerate. I wish I had your eloquence when posting. I honestly think and rethink anything I post and then rethink it after. So thanks for putting my mind at ease. Your amazing. I'd just like to place JC anywhere during that day or night so there was a better timeline to go by. When I watched JC's brother interviewed and rewatched DC's family interview last night it was an exercise in how different relationships can be in families. Brother and brother, sister and sister, brother and sister. All love, support, and respect each other but they express it differently. So when JC's brother said his 1st reaction to the news was did JC get himself in trouble or debt (he later dispelled his thoughts) I was a little surprised though I shouldn't have been. But it led me to think about my grown sons and how they might act or talk in the same situation and I can see them reacting similarly and wondering the same thing. Not because the brother was known to get in trouble but because there is a lifetime of memories all balled up into one and before becoming responsible adults they weren't bad but they weren't perfect little angels either. Ok, I'm rambling now and that may not have made sense lol. Hugs to you OceanOh honey I am so sorry if you took my post that way. I have such great respect for you too and for everyone on this forum.
In no way was anything directed toward you nor really anyone else either.
I just think theories should at least have some collaborative basis for them to be formalize especially since Jim is a victim of a cold blooded murder who has no ability to defend himself. That is just how 'I' look at all cases though..not just this one.
Others of course have the same right to look at cases anyway they wish to do it. I am just expressing my own opinions.
Yet here there hasn't been even a hint Jim even gambled or went to the casino.
Imo the reporters would have long found that out by now since this is such a small community.
Yet after almost a month not one person has said Jim was even a casino gambler or even gambled at all.
All we have been told is Jim worked 60 to 80 hours a week putting in long hard hours and he worked on 10.. 14.. 18. That doesnt leave a lot of free time. The only other thing we have learned about Jim's off time is he went to the gym.
I truly think the only reason the casino was even mentioned in the call log at all is because LE knew they would have camera footage of the road which could possibly show them what vehicles passed by right before and after the crimes had happened.
Imo if the casino had not been close by the murder scene location the casino wouldnt have even come up or been mentioned in the 911 call log ...imo
While I do understand your theory....I honestly do not understand the ones who say Jim had some kind of imaginary unknown gambling debt so high that its the reason he and Denise were murdered because of it and Jayme taken.
I have seen nothing whatsoever in almost a month's time that even begins to support that thinking.
I could understand it of course if someone said he was known to hang out at the casino gambling all the time on his off time but not one person who knows him has said even such a thing. None...that I am aware of...
That's all I am saying and I do understand people have been killed when they have won money or the lottery.
It happened to a young man in my own state who lived about 45 miles away from us. The man had won 140K on a stratch off ticket and of course it made the local news and a photo of the man and his name was in it
Iirc there were 2 suspects and they forced their way into his home one night demanding he give them the money he had won but he had already put it all in the bank.
They shot and murdered the poor man right in front of his wife and several of his young children. It was a heartbreaking case filled with evil and greed.
I just don't think that is the case here. Jmoo
