vls12345
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2021
- Messages
- 4,768
- Reaction score
- 38,814
And a husband cheating, running off and being a criminal really aren't reasons to take children away from their dad. In my personal opinion, he may be scum, but he deserves visitation. Taking a child away from a dad shouldn't be the kind of punishment we go for in this world. It should only be done, IN MY OPINION, when the child is endangered by the dad.
All of this, MOO.
RSBM.
Imo, having sole custody doesn't mean the kids would never see their dad. I would assume that sole custody would mean that she is responsible for all educational, extracurricular, financial, medical, & religious decisions for her children (rather than shared custody where the parents would have to agree to those things or where one parent might be "in charge" of some decisions while the other parent would be "in charge" of other things). At least, that's how I think it might work even though laws vary between states & I'm not sure what WI laws are regarding it. Even if she has sole custody, I would think that some kind of visitation could be written into any agreements. I think that at least two of their kids are teens & courts, imo, do give teens some leeway to determine whether or not they want to spend more or less time with a parent. I would also assume that WI may require child support payments for any children under 18. And once each child reaches the age of 18, it will be their own decision to have contact (or not) with a parent. All just my opinion as I don't know specific WI laws regarding child custody issues during separations/annulments/divorces.