Sorry, I'm a bit late to this case.She is guilty IMO.
Very convincing performance under direct examination, but the texts between them show the lies in everything she testified to.
She became a different person under cross-examination. I noticed how she was manipulating the jury under direct, with her persona and smiles and trying to inject humor and care into her narrative. Under cross she was rattled and defiant.
9/10 for her acting. I appreciated the concise and precise cross-examination style of the prosecutor.
MOO