Horace Finklestein
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 5,658
- Reaction score
- 1
While I do NOT vouch for the story, nor the authors of the stories, I do have an opinion of what I choose to believe about portions of the story as it relates to the Grunds and their depositions on Wednesday, Dec 8th. I wait for confirmation through official documents.
I personally believe that things were said in the Grund depositions and then reported in the blogger stories. I believe that a source has most likely told the Grunds that Lee visited Jesse with the sole objective to collect DNA from Jesse, and this is what the Grunds stated during their depositions. (now, whether these allegations can be PROVEN or not, is another question altogether). I believe the Grunds made these statements, UNDER OATH, during their depositions.
I believe that the media did not know the Grunds were being deposed on Wednesday, Dec 8th ... but the unidentified source for the stories DID KNOW that Richard Grund was deposed that day, and the source knew BEFORE the depositions took place. For some reason, none of the usual Florida news outlets ever published the information that the Grunds were deposed on Wednesday, Dec. 8th - not even the next day.
It is interesting that the Grunds did not issue a DENIAL that they were deposed on Wednesday, Dec 8th (because they were - even though the Notice of Deposition had not been filed with the Clerk until AFTER the depositions were completed).
The Grunds have not DENIED that Lee visited Jesse in Georgia, and have not denied that they were "told" by someone, that Lee wanted Jesse's DNA to plant.
I find the Defense intense focus on touch DNA on Caylee's shorts and the laundry bag interesting.
I find Cindy's statements on the "TODAY" show on Aug 13, 2010, interesting - wherein Cindy made a statement regarding an issue that she had NOT been asked about. Cindy blurted out - "They must be saying that Casey must have been so calculated that she was able to put Caylee's remains down there without any any any link to her. There's no fibers, there's no hair, there's no DNA there's no fingerprints of Caseys or anyone in our family."
The TODAY SHOW interviewer was only talking about Casey - but Cindy added "or anyone in our family". Law enforcement had not alleged that any of the family was at the remains site, but Cindy brings this up. Cindy appears to have knowledge and a certainty about these matters -- how would she know about any DNA on Caylee's remains or Caylee's belongings?
Lee refused a polygraph and encouraged his family to refuse also.
Cindy did everything she could to sabotage Tim Miller's search efforts, and never helped search for Caylee herself.
Cindy sent P.I. Dominic Casey to the remains site - his search was video taped by Hoover.
Somehow P.I. Dominic searched within yards of where Caylee's remains were later found.
I believe it is possible that someone intended to plant Jesse's DNA on Caylee's remains and/or Caylee's belongings .... however I have no idea if it can be PROVEN in a court of law. For the time being, I am satisfied in my own mind, that these allegations were very probably stated during a deposition(s) with the deponent UNDER OATH. Whether the public will ever see a transcript of the depositions remains to be seen .... the Defense surely will have no interest in releasing these transcripts of depositions of the Grunds.
Yes she was a bit too obvious in her obsessive repetition of instructing people to look for a "live caylee" and telling LE the grunds were suspects, as if she were a fellow detective. I pray pray pray the Anthonys go to prison.