Wrongful Death Suit filed Nov. 13, 2013 in California, #3

[AZlawyer]

A significant amount of work has been done for this WDS thus far and the judge is still declining to dismiss the lawsuit. It's apparent there's a lot of information being revealed that calls into question SDSO's decision to label Rebecca's death a suicide.

If the judge thought the lawsuit frivolous or unsupported by evidence, she would have dismissed it by now. But she's continuing to push for depositions and further gathering of evidence. At this point it seems most likely the case will move forward. The case schedule certainly indicates the primary witnesses/defendants will be deposed. Those depositions should be coming up soon. It doesn't seem likely Dina can delay hers any longer.

The judge has not seen any evidence yet. If one or more of the Defendants files a summary judgment motion, that will be her first opportunity to determine whether there is enough evidence to proceed to trial.

 

[LuckyLucy2]

How is it that you know the particulars of James DiMaggio's death well enough to decide the merits of a lawsuit his family has filed? Oh, that's right. You don't know, because you weren't there. You just imagine you know.

See how that works?

I not surprised that you (and the Zahau's lawyer) would be on the side of a man that tortured and killed Hannah Anderson's mother, killed her brother and dog, then kidnapped a 16-year old girl. But it is the FBI in the wrong for killing the creep?
You must think Casey Anthony was innocent, too?

 

[LuckyLucy2]

BBM. Please kindly add your link for the Zahaus LOSING their first lawyers. Repeatedly stating something doesn't make it true and I've asked for a link before.

These lawyers may have interjected themselves in the case for publicity and then moved on. The former lawyers may have had singular/personal motives to get involved as well. It is truly unfair to attempt to make it appear that the Zahaus keep LOSING lawyers.

Please link and TUIA.

Sounds like you are admitting that Anne Bremner and Martin Rudoy, and the other lawyer (I forget his name at the moment), were only in it for publicity, and not "justice".

But don't forget money. THAT was their main motive. Once they realized they had no case - and therefore, no big payoff - they were out of there.

THAT only takes common sense to know - not a link.

JMO

 

[coastal]

I not surprised that you (and the Zahau's lawyer) would be on the side of a man that tortured and killed Hannah Anderson's mother, killed her brother and dog, then kidnapped a 16-year old girl. But it is the FBI in the wrong for killing the creep?
You must think Casey Anthony was innocent, too?

Excuse me? I don't believe I stated my opinion about the lawsuit you brought into this discussion. See, I don't actually have an opinion about it, because I don't know anything about it. You, on the other hand, seem to have already decided the case; I simply asked how it is that you have the knowledge to do so.

 

[justice be served]

Sounds like you are admitting that Anne Bremner and Martin Rudoy, and the other lawyer (I forget his name at the moment), were only in it for publicity, and not "justice".

But don't forget money. THAT was their main motive. Once they realized they had no case - and therefore, no big payoff - they were out of there.

THAT only takes common sense to know - not a link.

JMO

I have no idea what you are talking about and don't care to delve into it as it is not germaine to my request.

Continually you state that the Zahaus lose their lawyers and please don't twist my request for you to provide a link to back up your contentions of that. Simple as that. Anything else is frankly trolling.

Again please link your knowledge that the Zahaus keep LOSING their lawyers. And, again, I ask kindly.

 

[bourne]

The judge has not seen any evidence yet. If one or more of the Defendants files a summary judgment motion, that will be her first opportunity to determine whether there is enough evidence to proceed to trial.

Thanks AZlawyer!

I see Dina still has not filed a Summary Judgment Motion yet...Seems to me she's afraid to file one for fear that if she does, the court and public will for certain see that there IS sufficient valid evidence against her as POI for Rebecca's murder. I would go so far as to say there is a preponderance of evidence to indicate that she had PREMEDITATED, ORGANIZED, and EXECUTED Rebecca's murder.

The truth is finally coming out regarding Rebecca's murder. And Dina can't escape her culpability any longer. <modsnip>

 

[Betty P]

The judge has not seen any evidence yet. If one or more of the Defendants files a summary judgment motion, that will be her first opportunity to determine whether there is enough evidence to proceed to trial.

Thanks for that clarification.

 

[LuckyLucy2]

I don't want this thread to close, so am reposting the rules so we can review them...

Websleuths (WS) Etiquette & Information

Freedom of Speech:
While we believe very much in the freedom of speech & expression, you DO NOT have an absolute right to say whatever you want in this community. WS is based in the United States, but is not an agency of the Federal or any State government - so the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution and similar State amendments regarding your right to free speech DO NOT APPLY HERE. Anything that goes against our core beliefs and the purpose for which this community was designed may not be allowed. Posts and comments that are meant to incite conflicts between members or outside parties are strictly prohibited. WS Administration has the absolute right to edit, modify, close or delete any content found in this community. While this rarely, if ever happens, we will not tolerate individuals or groups creating problems with the overall membership.

Victim Friendly:
Websleuths is a victim friendly forum. Attacking or bashing a victim is not allowed. Discussing victim behavior, good or bad is fine, but do so in a civil and constructive way and ONLY IF IT IS RELEVANT TO THE CASE. Additionally, sleuthing family members or others that are not suspect is not allowed. Don't make random accusations or post personal information (even if it is public) like parking tickets, address, or first and last names of all their relatives and their neighbors. Also, never "bash" or attack them, or accuse them of involvement. However that does not mean that family members or others cannot come into discussion as the facts and issues of the case are discussed.

Abuse / Flaming / Derogatory Comments:
Abusive Comments, Flaming, or derogatory insults or comments are strictly against the rules. If you disagree with another member&#8217;s point of view, do so in a mature and civil manner. If someone posts to discuss their personal problems or seeks help from other forums members, please do not respond unless you have something positive or helpful to add. If you find yourself being flamed or insulted by another member, please do not dignify that person with a response. Notify a moderator and let us handle it.

Derogatory Name Changes to Case Players/General Name Calling:
In an effort to keep case discussion constructive, name calling, general bashing and using derogatory name variations for any of the case players is not tolerated. Regardless of how we may feel about many of the people that are the focus of our discussion here,it is always best to elevate the conversation and avoid this type of posting behavior. Feel free to express your displeasure with individuals that are being discussed, just avoid petty nastiness,name calling, name changes and over the top rude posts directed at case players.

Baiting / Trolling / Inciting Conflict:
&#8220;Trolling&#8221; or making posts with the intention of creating problems on the forums is obviously against the forum guidelines. This includes registering an alternative ID for the sole purpose of creating problems on the forums. &#8220;Troll ID&#8217;s&#8221; will be locked immediately and permanently, and the primary account holder may be banned from WS. Members that visit WS only to participate in &#8220;conflict&#8221; threads may be designated as Trolling and have their account temporarily or permanently suspended. WS also reserves the right to require a certain number of posts, length of membership, or other criteria be met to allow posting on certain topics. We have zero tolerance for members that create posts with the sole purpose of antagonizing other members.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...mp-Information

Terms of Service - Short, Plain Language Version

We have a detailed, formal Terms of Service (TOS) posted separately, and that TOS is what you will be held to as a member here. It's long and detailed because it has to be in the world we live in, and you are expected to read it, understand it and abide by it. However, we can sum it up as follows:

1) Be a decent human being;
2) Treat your fellow posters as the decent human beings they are;
3) Keep in mind that whatever you post will likely live on forever, so think before you press "Submit Reply".
4) It's a big world. People will disagree with you. You will disagree with them. This can be done with respect, and that's what we expect.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sho...nguage-Version

 

[Frigga]

Remembering the lovely woman this thread is about and hoping for justice for her. Sigh.

 

[Frigga]

I'm not good at posting pictures- can someone please post a picture of Rebecca- other than the ONE mug shot photo please? I am about sick and tired of seeing that image in the feed, it is disrespectful at the least and down right vicious in its intentions to the victim of this thread. TIA~ Frigga

 

[kimi_SFC]

:rose:

image courtesy:
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/loc...-Death-Suicide-Murder-Shacknai-269595631.html via @nbcsandiego


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[screecher]

Thanks, kimi. She's so lovely.

*was*.

 

[LuckyLucy2]

And here is one of adorable little Max, the other person that died that week, with his loving Mother, the woman who is falsely accused of being an accomplice to murder by Rebecca Zahau's family in this Civil Case for $10 Million Dollars:

 

[LuckyLucy2]

^^^^^^^ I believe Dina Shacknai is a defendant in this Civil WD Case, isn't she? And isn't she requesting all of the information about her son's death, in this Wrongful Death Case, (where she is accused of being an accomplice to murder - even though there is no evidence at all to support that - in a case that was ruled a suicide)? And didn't (according to four law enforcement agencies, the ME, and 15 detectives) Rebecca Zahau kill herself, just 40 hours after he had a fatal accident while under her supervision? While little Max still lay in the ICU on life support?

Yes? Then I have the right thread.

 

[screecher]

Becky with two sisters

 

[screecher]

Another pic of lovely Rebecca

 

[screecher]

Two of three defendants in this case

dina

adam

sorry people, couldn't find a pic of the yogi pants wearer, nina

 

[screecher]

Hope I posted the pics so all could see, brand new to this. My apologies if they are screwed up.

 

[LuckyLucy2]

Nina Romano with her nephew, sweet, little Max - who would barely make it to 6 years old, due to the negligence of Rebecca Zahau.



And here he is with both Nina, and his Mother, both of whom he loved dearly, according to all reports:

 

[LuckyLucy2]

Here is baby Max. You can just see the love in his Mother's eyes:



And one when he is older: