Aunt2AnAngel
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2019
- Messages
- 29
- Reaction score
- 198
Surely to God some of the neighbors have cameras out there. Right?!
It would probably be a waste of time and money as BL appears to be judgement proof.YUP Wrongful Death jmo
Well of course, but there will be plenty of circumstantial evidence. We have no idea what LE has or what was found on her body.Im thinking about proving in court, not in the court of public opinion.
Anyone have a link for John Walsh tonight at 10? TIA
The reporter did not ask that question. I hope that LE did. If not, LE needs to pay these neighbors another visit and find out. The neighbors also stated that the camper for the pickup truck was purchased in September and BL and his dad spent considerable time working on it, then loaded it up and off BL and his parents went in it for a long weekend. Given the circumstances, it is a suspicious turn of events, which I hope will be investigated in detail and LE can verify this story and find out where they went.Did the neighbors see him after the three day trip with his parents?
I think he let them know that he wanted to get away from her so Mummy and Daddy bought him a ticket and furnished an excuse for him to go home. Just speculation, on my part. jmoTo help his dad move stuff into or out of storage apparently. I'm not certain if he did end up flying home and back. Struck me as odd.
Against BL ? What are they going to get? He’s got nothing.YUP Wrongful Death jmo
If August 27th is being narrowed down as the potential day she passed, then maybe the man in the background of the youtube video "digging" wasn't actually digging but doing something far more sinister? It does not seem as though her body was found buried
Sigh. Around here, you have to have hard evidence. Yes circumstantial evidence is included but if there is a plausible alternate scenario or explanation, case is thrown out. Doesn’t even go to court.I'm really not sure what type of evidence people think you need in a murder case. Most murders are not captured on CCTV to be played for a jury. Most cases are circumstantial. Direct evidence, like eye witness testimony, is notoriously unreliable. All the CSI-style scientific evidence is circumstantial.
Wouldn't that depend on the manner of death? For example, if it is blunt force trauma (a hit on the head) there may be the possibility that Gabby died from being shoved, falling down, and hitting her head.
Absolutely not saying that this is what happened, but just picturing what a defense team might come up with (if BL is caught, charged, and goes to trial).
I’m no longer in the field, but I have a BS in Forensic Biology with a specialization in blood spatter analysis and lemme tell you - it is absolutely nothing, NOTHING like TV portrays. It’s not as fun and glamorous as it is on the tube. At all.I blame Matlock. And Ally McBeal. And all of the combined CSI and L&O franchises.
Fair point. Though a grocer is certainly better than nothing, and nothing is what a number of people insistently claim he does on a daily basis here.Well, if you're almost 24, work an entry-level job at Publix, and live with your parents, you ARE financially reliant on them.
The updated statement from the restaurant does NOT state the date of that incident.Not sure if this has been posted (I can’t keep up) but the Merry Piglets restaurant where a witness reported seeing Brian in an argument with the staff has posted on their Facebook page to confirm that Gabby and Brian were there
The Merry Piglets Mexican Grill
I’m not saying that isn’t suspicious! But from their point of view that van was theirs (gabby and Brian’s) they both worked on it, put time into it, drove it and lived in it. It was also registered to the Laundrie’s home, no? Yes the title was in her name technically but I’m sure people who knew them saw it as theirs. And who knows what crazy story he told his parents! “She broke up with me again and ran off with a guy! She’s awful! She hurt me so badly! Now i have this stupid van and i don’t know what to do!” I’m not saying it’s believable, the truth, makes sense, none of that. But it could have happened. We DONT KNOW.
Can we put the whole "stolen van" thing to rest? It doesn't matter. Both myself and my husband are on the title for our vehicles. If we vacation across the country in it and I decide to drive it back without him, who cares. That isn't the important part. The important part would be if he ended up dead without so much as reaching out to someone to let them know that he was left behind/stayed behind, and that, upon being confronted with the information that no one had heard from him, I said not a word and didn't help his family when they begged me for answers. Those are the important details.
I would be the one being hunted down by the FBI all the same, no matter the status of vehicle ownership. Is it appalling that he drove it home? Yes. Does it change anything that he didn't own it? No.
Maybe wondering how they'll detain him if not named a suspect is answered here. With GP officially identified, her family has legal rights to the van. Perhaps there's a legal definition LE advised them on in terms of Brian being a suspect in the theft of that vehicle. Now they can hold him on auto theft?Now that Gabby is dead, the van goes to next of kin which are parents, unless she stipulated otherwise in will or whatever state of FL recognized as such.
If it were in BL’s —the title, he would get the van when LE releases it. If it were GP’s father’s van , he could have demanded it immediately, at any time, when LE released it, and it would be released to him now.
Thank you. This seems like a significant detail to me. The bridge offered an easy route from the van to where GP was found. Is that because they were camping there and something happened leading to her death? Or was it an easy route to carry her body?