BondJamesBond
Blunt Instrument
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2008
- Messages
- 3,871
- Reaction score
- -12
Very interesting.....
I'm not ready to give up on that theory yet. Too weird that payments were being made and then suddenly stop and lead to a DL getting suspended. Why would someone put forth an effort to pay part of the fine but not all of it?
Thanks for keeping tabs on the ticket!
Methinks somehow the moving violation payment could have been straight-forward...however...when charged for operating w/o a DL it seems one would be required to produce a DL in order to fully process the charge...maybe...maybe not...:waitasec:
IIRC, there was a $50 payment on the no-DL charge. Then, oh chit, goto jail 7/16. That makes the August payments particularly interesting, 'cause...
1) Making payments on them would be an admission of guilt/fraud impersonating ZG.
2) Seems like there was some buzz early on suggesting LE or SA might pay/process fees to keep the tix under the radar. However, if that was the case they prolly woulda just done something administratively or with the courts approval and it would be entered non-descript on the record vs. just leaving it open.
The August payment is just baffling.