Zellner Tweets

[BigCityAccountant]

So I was passing thru the area again last night. I noticed that that rest/truck stop that has always bothered me is about 4 miles from SA's exit. It was closer than I thought. Oh and we had at one time discussed how busy 147 was at night. Passing thru their at 9:40pm there was not a soul on that road when we passed over it on I-43 much to my surprise.

Another thing I thought of....Generallt people use increments of 5 when talking about distance. So why was KZ so specific with 12 miles? Why not say 10 miles or 15 miles?? But she said 12 miles and that makes it more specific. But why be so specific?? Who lives or lived within that 12 miles??? The only person I can think of is.... GZ. Anyone else have any thoughts as to why KZ would be so specific???

 

[dexter75]

So I was passing thru the area again last night. I noticed that that rest/truck stop that has always bothered me is about 4 miles from SA's exit. It was closer than I thought. Oh and we had at one time discussed how busy 147 was at night. Passing thru their at 9:40pm there was not a soul on that road when we passed over it on I-43 much to my surprise.

Another thing I thought of....Generallt people use increments of 5 when talking about distance. So why was KZ so specific with 12 miles? Why not say 10 miles or 15 miles?? But she said 12 miles and that makes it more specific. But why be so specific?? Who lives or lived within that 12 miles??? The only person I can think of is.... GZ. Anyone else have any thoughts as to why KZ would be so specific???

Well..now that you mention it..

Could it have anything to do with towers being measured geographically? Not actual driving distance?

 

[Jaiddie]

http://imgur.com/zY17Vnp Latest Zellner tweet!

 

[dexter75]

http://imgur.com/zY17Vnp Latest Zellner tweet!

I'm sure it is😉

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk

 

[missy1974]

A tweet from Zellner today... with a link to a great controlled interview! Says she will be filing next week, and gives us some incite into what she is going to do.



http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/1...ned.html?_r=1&referer=https://www.google.com/

 

[Limaes]

No one does a great controlled interview like Zellner

7-8 months later and she is only now filing for access to the DNA evidence? I thought she was a sprinter, not a long distance runner

 

[BigCityAccountant]

No one does a great controlled interview like Zellner

7-8 months later and she is only now filing for access to the DNA evidence? I thought she was a sprinter, not a long distance runner

<modsnip>

I can't imagine being family and having to question whether or not SA was responsible and the mere thought of someone living life to its fullest and not being held responsible, if in fact SA is not responsible would just infuriate me. :maddening:

 

[CoolJ]

<modsnip>

I can't imagine being family and having to question whether or not SA was responsible and the mere thought of someone living life to its fullest and not being held responsible, if in fact SA is not responsible would just infuriate me. :maddening:

Exactly! This is about justice for TH. I don't understand why those that are convinced BD and SA are guilty, are so against further investigation. Offense is your best defence I guess....
I am well aware of "disinfo agents" ( I am sure they call themselves something different) who are hired to help control narratives in forums and comments sections all over the internet. I see that in this case in many many places outside of WS. They keep repeating the Kratz bullet points while ignoring the fact that if this was a frame job, those points are irrelevant.

I see no issues with those who believe SA and or BD are guilty. What doesn't make sense are those who will not even consider anything other than the Kratz sick and twisted version of events. Be on the lookout for those "disinfo agents" in this case. They follow a script and it usually starts with " at first I didn't believe they were guilty, but now......"

<modsnip> JMO

 

[missy1974]

Exactly! This is about justice for TH. I don't understand why those that are convinced BD and SA are guilty, are so against further investigation. Offense is your best defence I guess....
I am well aware of "disinfo agents" ( I am sure they call themselves something different) who are hired to help control narratives in forums and comments sections all over the internet. I see that in this case in many many places outside of WS. They keep repeating the Kratz bullet points while ignoring the fact that if this was a frame job, those points are irrelevant.

I see no issues with those who believe SA and or BD are guilty. What doesn't make sense are those who will not even consider anything other than the Kratz sick and twisted version of events. Be on the lookout for those "disinfo agents" in this case. They follow a script and it usually starts with " at first I didn't believe they were guilty, but now......"

<modsnip> JMO

Here is an article from a few months back about the Sheriffs Dept getting PR help. http://www.postcrescent.com/story/n...got-pr-help-after-avery-documentary/83537512/

Would not be surprised if "disinfo agents" are part of that.

 

[IDK]

Here is an article from a few months back about the Sheriffs Dept getting PR help. http://www.postcrescent.com/story/n...got-pr-help-after-avery-documentary/83537512/

Would not be surprised if "disinfo agents" are part of that.

I'd never heard that term before, but it would definitely explain some of the online interactions I've seen.

 

[missy1974]

I'd never heard that term before, but it would definitely explain some of the online interactions I've seen.

I don't think it's just in this case. I think it has been used in other cases like Ferguson, MO. In this new world of social media, I guess PR firms need to cover all angles. JMO

 

[Jaiddie]

I know this is somewhat off topic because it's not a tweet from Zellner, but thought this was the best thread to put it in. SG tweet from today: https://imgur.com/a/d6PJE I am so excited now to see what is up tomorrow!!

 

[Safeguard]

This quote from the Zellner interview sums it up perfectly imo.

"I've never seen a more graphic, compelling illustration of a crime scene that was fabricated".

I fail to see how anyone can review this case and still insist there's not so much as a shred of reasonable doubt!

It's truly puzzling to me... It reminds me, very much, of the,"OJ is innocent" crowd.

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest" (The Boxer, Simon & Garfunkel)

 

[dexter75]

This quote from the Zellner interview sums it up perfectly imo.

"I've never seen a more graphic, compelling illustration of a crime scene that was fabricated".

I fail to see how anyone can review this case and still insist there's not so much as a shred of reasonable doubt!

It's truly puzzling to me... It reminds me, very much, of the,"OJ is innocent" crowd.

"Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest" (The Boxer, Simon & Garfunkel)

YES!
Especially that last line. Zellner did sum it up perfectly, my opinion as well:applause:

 

[Limaes]

"I've never seen a more graphic, compelling illustration of a crime scene that was fabricated".

It was so compelling that she did nothing and sat on his files for 4 years?

Thankfully not everyone is impressed with her claims because real eyes, realise, real lies

 

[CoolJ]

It was so compelling that she did nothing and sat on his files for 4 years?

Thankfully not everyone is impressed with her claims because real eyes, realise, real lies

So you are saying she knew this case inside/out 4 yrs ago? I would request a link to back up that statement.

And yes, those of us with an open mind can surely see the "real lies" and where they are coming from in this case. And that made up crime scene is one of the most obvious lies in this case....right from the mouth of the most crooked prosecutor these real eyes have ever realised.

 

[Limaes]

'Initially, she could not take the case because she was too busy. But she kept Steve's files and said some day she might be able to look at it again.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ert-Christianity-says-convinced-innocent.html

 

[Justiceseeker35]

I know this is somewhat off topic because it's not a tweet from Zellner, but thought this was the best thread to put it in. SG tweet from today: https://imgur.com/a/d6PJE I am so excited now to see what is up tomorrow!!

Oh my fellow sleuthers, I'm so anxious to see what KZ has in store. I just want to say as we are on the brink of answers (finally) how much I've enjoyed all your posts, discoveries, shares, debates, arguements and discussions we've had over the months. I've learned a ton from you all especially more than I've ever wanted to know about cell towers and phone records. Hopefully, after today we are no longer in doubt as to innocence or guilt.
What in the world am I going to do when this is all over??!! I need a new hobby.

 

[IDK]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ert-Christianity-says-convinced-innocent.html

Your link goes right to an article confirming that SA's fiancee is convinced he is innocent. Thanks, it was an interesting read. Didn't have time to read the whole thing though, so maybe I missed the comment about KZ. In any case, I take all these articles with a grain of salt, especially the Daily Mail.

 

[missy1974]

Oh my fellow sleuthers, I'm so anxious to see what KZ has in store. I just want to say as we are on the brink of answers (finally) how much I've enjoyed all your posts, discoveries, shares, debates, arguements and discussions we've had over the months. I've learned a ton from you all especially more than I've ever wanted to know about cell towers and phone records. Hopefully, after today we are no longer in doubt as to innocence or guilt.
What in the world am I going to do when this is all over??!! I need a new hobby.

BBM
I'm sure BCA would agree with you LOL She even tried to find those dang towers while driving on holidays through the area!

I sure hope we see something today! Thanks for hanging in here with us Justice