Last I read the winds are heading towards tokyo but i can't cite that because I've been reading tons of links.....
:shocked2:866 ngy/h ??
Researching Chernobyl the max I could find that it reached was 250 ngy/h.
I found this in regards to Chernobyl
http://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...1225be0ab7310f852f22cd7c6bce78b5&searchtype=a
The hazard ratio (HR) per 100 nanoGray/hour (nGy/h) was significantly increased for total malignancies and for several sites; however, contrary to expectations, an obvious and anticipated linear exposure–response relationship could not be identified. With the lowest exposure category (0–60 nGy/h) as reference, a statistically significantly increased HR for total malignancies was seen in all exposure categories, except in the highest category 96–366 nGy/h. For breast cancer, thyroid cancer and leukaemia an obvious exposure–response could not be seen.
BBM Interesting. However, when Chernobyl popped it's cookies, and the big cloud of radiation was circling the globe over and over again, my youngest daughter was not quite 7. All my kids were scared. I told them we wouldn't know for years and years what would happen.
Well, years and years went by, and my youngest daughter has thyroid cancer, an incurable, very rare kind, 12 studies ever done, mostly found in Asians. Can I prove Chernobyl was responsible? No. Can anyone else? I doubt it. Would they tell us if they did know? Do I believe the statement I bolded? NO.
omg...wow
Reminder: Using Websleuths to promote any mass campaign must go through Tricia for approval.
I am digging for reliable information about exposure to 750 rads of radiation... from what I've found, it's not good. Not good at all... OMG, is right.
I'm trying to get beyond the forums.
It was hard to get this question answered... brace yourselves.
http://gramercyimages.com/blog1/2011/03/12/map-of-potential-fallout-from-fukushima-reactor/
I am digging for reliable information about exposure to 750 rads of radiation... from what I've found, it's not good. Not good at all... OMG, is right.
I'm trying to get beyond the forums.
Someone tried to rally support to have you ousted from the community, but I shut it down.Everything I do of that nature is approved by her first, was there a mass campaign I missed out on? I always miss the fun, lol.
We each recieve about 500rads a year from background radiation. 750 is not that bad, and is not more than you get from some medical procedures. A VQ scan can give up to 700 rads and I've had three of them with no effects.
Millirems, not rads. 1000 millirems equal 1 rad.