This case has always bothered me for years. No leads to go on
https://identifyus.org/cases/2489Passenger (hitchhiker), designated "John Doe #09-74," in a van/truck that rear-ended a parked semi-tractor trailer and burned. He appeared to be about 20, and told fellow travelers his first name was "Terence" (or "Terrance"), but went by the nickname "Lee". He was picked up hitch-hiking in Council Bluffs, Iowa (Herbie's 76 Truck Stop), in route to Reno, Nevada, where he said he was going to pick-up a paycheck for a dishwashing job. He stated that he was originally been from Florida, but had recently lived in Indiana.
NamUs UP #2489 is an unidentified young male hitchhiker who died in an auto accident on November 8, 1974 near Baker (San Bernardino County), CA. According to NamUs --
https://identifyus.org/cases/2489
I thought about Terry Lee Westerfield when I read this. He would have been about 21 in 1974.
The NamUs report says the hair color is "Dark-brown, could be taken for black". Red hair ioften fades to brown with age and the body was also burned. Instinct says the stepfather killed the two boys but this unidentified young man is interesting using the name Terrence or Lee and being the same age and from the same part of the country.
Yep- I was thinking the SE US part of the country. If the kids ran away on their own that day and hitched around it could be a possibility but not at all likely I'm afraid. The youngest one was 6 at the time they disappeared so that especially rules out that particular scenario for me.It happened in California so this would be on the other side of the country. Driver said hitchhiker said he was from Florida and lived in Indiana some, and picked him up in Iowa. So nothing linked to NC. They have the hitchhikers DNA. I looked in NAMUS for Terry Westerfield and it says DNA is not available. Does that mean that there is no DNA for the brothers on file? I just can't see the 2 boys disappearing forever from their mothers and never being seen from again just to become drifters. Something very bad happened to them that day
It happened in California so this would be on the other side of the country. Driver said hitchhiker said he was from Florida and lived in Indiana some, and picked him up in Iowa. So nothing linked to NC. They have the hitchhikers DNA. I looked in NAMUS for Terry Westerfield and it says DNA is not available. Does that mean that there is no DNA for the brothers on file? I just can't see the 2 boys disappearing forever from their mothers and never being seen from again just to become drifters. Something very bad happened to them that day
Admittedly, it is far fetched because it is likely that the stepfather murdered the two boys. I wasn't really thinking that they disappeared to become drifters, more along the lines that the stepfather gave them to someone instead of actually killing them (maybe someone who wanted kids who would keep them away from him and his then wife) or something that has nothing to do with the stepfather and the two boys had the misfortune to encounter someone like Michael J. Devlin, who kept them against their will for a prolonged amount of time.
Admittedly, it is far fetched because it is likely that the stepfather murdered the two boys. I wasn't really thinking that they disappeared to become drifters, more along the lines that the stepfather gave them to someone instead of actually killing them (maybe someone who wanted kids who would keep them away from him and his then wife) or something that has nothing to do with the stepfather and the two boys had the misfortune to encounter someone like Michael J. Devlin, who kept them against their will for a prolonged amount of time.
I also think the boys were killed earlier in the day. The people who remembered seeing them probably had their days mixed up. Unfortunately, their mistake made it more difficult to prove the stepfather's involvement.I personally believe the boys were killed earlier in the day, I read about a neighbor boy knocking on the door wanting to play with one of the boys and the step-father told him he (Terry) was in a punishment, why would he still be allowed to go to the movies if he was being punished? Maybe he was already dead when his neighbor wanted to play. The step-father no longer had responsibility or obligation to the boys anymore, and maybe wanted to get back at their mom for divorcing him?
The children were regulars at the theater they supposedly went missing from, the theater workers, who would have recognized them, didn't even see them that day (some say they did, others didn't).