Sorry, the statement was: "There was no evidence on his body that he got hit. I’m very unclear how there’s argument about this"
The pieces of her car, embedded in his clothing, are evidence that the car made contact with him at some point that evening.
The amount of evidence that would need to be planted, at the level of detail that it is present, is too much for for even a team of bad-actors to pull off.
Pieces of a tail light embedded in his clothing
might be evidence that the car made contact with him, but you ought to pay particular attention to the chain of custody. The crime scene was never secured, the house was never searched, tail light pieces kept magically appearing days after the incident, multiple pieces of video evidence went missing. The list goes on.
The two most important pieces of evidence (which are less prone to tampering) are the body itself and the car.
It very much looks like the body wasn't hit by a car,
It very much looks like the car didn't hit a body.
And god knows how you think he might have gotten a dog bitten arm.
JOK was rendered unconscious from the blow to his head, and would have died shortly after that. He didn't get up off the roadway and walk to the location that he was discovered. And he can't have been hit so hard that he flew there, as the prosecution alleges.
The other glaring evidence is that his body temperature was 80*f at 6:30am when he was found.
If he had actually been lying out in a blizzard for six hours, he would be frozen.
