TTF14
Anti echo chamber. Anti virtue signaling.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 15,626
- Reaction score
- 72,498
Not yet. We're all waiting for it, though.Do we know the split count?
Not yet. We're all waiting for it, though.Do we know the split count?
Nope.Do we know the split count?
he did say something to her and her reaction was not good. This got me to wondering if he has taken in the children? Think about them during all of this...The brother is holding onto a lot of resentment and anger, even after 2.5 years. I didn't see him say anything to KR after the mistrial, however the look on his face when he glared and sneered at KR sure was scary. I hope he gets some therapy for everybody's sake. MOO.
Proctor refused to answer questions from the NBC10 Boston Investigators after the murder......@KathyReports
The controversial @MassStatePolice trooper who was the lead investigator in the Karen Read murder trial was home in Canton when the case ended in a mistrial. Hear what he had to say on @NBC10Boston COMING up at 6PM.
View attachment 514781
![]()
Mistrial declared in Karen Read trial, prosecution intends to re-try
Judge Beverly Cannone made the announcement in Norfolk Superior Court Monday, after reading out a note from the jury’s foreman that said, “to continue to deliberate would be futile.”www.nbcboston.com
Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor refused to answer questions from the NBC10 Boston Investigators after the murder trial against Karen Read ended with a hung jury.
Could be a civil case coming...he did say something to her and her reaction was not good. This got me to wondering if he has taken in the children? Think about them during all of this...
Bam!!
BAM is right!!!!!!! You broke the news (at least to me!)! Amazing!!!Bam!!
Bam!! Bam!!
Bam!! Bam!! Bam!!!!!
@KristinaRex
BREAKING: Trooper Michael Proctor has been relieved of his duties with Massachusetts State Police.
View attachment 514788
8:31 PM · Jul 1, 2024
I'd be a bit afraid of what he would have said or done if she was acquitted.Could be a civil case coming...
too little too late. He still has a job.Bam!!
Bam!! Bam!!
Bam!! Bam!! Bam!!!!!
@OldCop can you explain this?
This gives me the chills for all jurors in all trials. Of course people on both sides have seen them. They are not 100% anonymous. In all cases there may be people who resent your decision. Even if unanimous. Somehow they need protection.UPDATE: The Norfolk Superior Court clerk’s office told me because of the mistrial, there will NOT be a juror list publicly released for the Karen Read trial
For reference, here is the 2015 SJC decision about juror lists being made public after verdicts in Massachusetts trials http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/470/470mass484.html
Key language (emphasis mine):"We conclude that the public's long-term interest in maintaining an open judicial process...requires that a list identifying the names of jurors who have been empanelled and RENDERED A VERDICT in a criminal case... be made available to the public.”
Also, even if there is a verdict, the legal decision stipulates when a juror list could be kept from the public: "Only on a judicial finding of good cause, which may include a risk of harm to the jurors or to the integrity of their service, may such a list be withheld."
@RyanNBCBoston
Charges coming? One can only hope…