Search results

Maybe the *advertiser censored* stuff was SA's "unemployment" possibilities......you know, a way to get back on his feet.

I'm also thinking they now have enough to search BD's computer at work on the kiddie *advertiser censored* case (where they didn't with the HD case).

I was under the impression it was a laptop...did anyone go back and look at the affadavit?? My guess is LE orginally got it by asking the standard question about what computers HD had access to. Before thinking it through, someone responded with that one. Which is probably why, a few days...

I think they released it now to keep BD from tainting the big rally this weekend.

I just haven't seen any evidence that they care enough to want her to live with them. She has lived in different places for different amounts of time in the past. She came and went as she pleased. I also haven't seen any evidence SA is into young girls. His gf is quite a bit older than he...

Maybe that's where SA went during his Mon/Tues drives...to make sure they didn't leave any evidence.

They say that somewhere in a person's statement is the truth!

How about they're doing whatever stupid thing they do and then HD runs out the door? Or they put her alive into to the car as part of the "prank" and take her out somewhere to scare her (because this seems to be the direction their "pranks" would take)? This would account for no fluids left...

My working theory: This was a "fun loving family" prank gone bad. "Pranks" have been brought up several times by BD (confessing?). BD and SA are immature. They lack judgment and are pretty stupid. Consider the "tattoo" on DD (which is what probably got him removed from the home)... Whether...

Not to mention, the adults are so stinking immature.

It's funny (as in strange) that yesterday I was trying to imagine how this lazy apathetic and stupid group would murder a child. I can't see it as cold blood. I have a hard time thinking SA was a child molester when his "woman of choice" is way older than he is. Also, the drugs they're on...

Thinking about the searches: IF SA was involved (at least in disposing of the body), he would've had all day Monday and/or Tuesday to do it. They weren't even on the radar until after that. Not to mention the possibility of Sunday night. I don't know....

Maybe BD was going to try to pull off the runaway card...but then all the other things (jacket, shoes, money) popped up. LE has been close-mouthed and if you go back, we only have BD filling in the gaps.

Does anyone know if there were random drug screenings done at the place of employment? Maybe he got there, found out he was due to a drug test, and decided he'd better check out and leave.

amen!

There have been conflicting stories about a landline. Anyone know for fact? If there IS one, then there were TWO possible phones for her to call on.

Someone on another website mentioned this (it's a little off topic but it does have to do with the cell calls): If BD's cell phone was left at the house for the kids to use, why didn't HD use it to call her and ask if she could go to MB's? Either: a) It's all a big story concocted by SA and...

I never quite understook how he quit his job and then immediately tried to get on to get unemployment.........HE quit. Are you able to get unemployment in TX if you QUIT? Also,,,,the phrase "until I got back on my feet" - He just quit that morning (supposedly). Is he the kind that only works...

Exactly! And now I need to add the fact that she didn't have SA come pick her up...or if he couldn't leave or she didn't want to involve him, why not get a ride and go by his work to get her car to go look for HD? Instead, she has someone else cart her around...why? when she has her own car...

This scenario is one of the things I can't get past when trying to convince myself these people might be innocent: 1. Why didn't she check with SA to confirm the message? 2. Why didn't she check the cellphone to see who HD had been talking to before she left? 3. Why did she tell CD to tell...